The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4000 qtrap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer is a highly sensitive and versatile analytical instrument designed for quantitative and qualitative analysis. It combines the functionality of a triple quadrupole and a linear ion trap mass spectrometer in a single platform. The core function of the 4000 QTRAP is to perform accurate mass measurements and provide structural information on a wide range of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using 4000 qtrap mass spectrometer

1

Lipid Extraction and Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from membranes as described (Bligh and Dyer, 1959 (link)). Samples were diluted to a final volume of 600 μl using deionized water, added to a 2:1 ratio of methanol and chloroform, and vortexed vigorously for 30 seconds. The mixture was centrifuged at 600 g for 10 minutes so that distinct layers formed. The lower layer was collected using a glass Pasteur pipette. The extraction procedure was repeated three times on each sample. Samples were washed with deionized water and evaporated under dry nitrogen gas in 2 ml borosilicate glass vials with Teflon-lined caps. Extracts were sent to the Kansas Lipidomics Research Center for analysis, and a diacyl polar lipid profile dataset was generated by quadrupole mass spectrometry using an Applied Biosystems 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer as described (Xiao et al., 2010 (link)). The relative abundances of the major polar lipid classes were compared among species. The unsaturation index (UI) was calculated as described previously (Grim et al., 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Retinoids in Rat Livers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retinoids were extracted from control and EtOH-treated rat livers as previously described[14 ]. Retinoid extracts were separated by HPLC using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using Phenomenex Synergi 4μ Max-RP 80A column (4 μm, 3×150 mm) as previously described [6 (link)]. Retinol and retinoic acid were identified using a 4000 Q TRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems) coupled with the HPLC. The mass spectrometer was controlled using Analyst version 1.5.1 software and was operated in a MRM mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Sphingolipids by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sphingolipids were extracted and quantified as described previously (23 (link)). Extracted lipids were quantified using the Applied Biosystems 4000 Q-Trap mass spectrometer. The measurements used hexadeuterated S1P as an internal standard and were normalized to total lipid phosphorous determined after wet digestion of total lipid extracts in perchloric acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Wastewater Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS determination of PA, IB, and CF in the wastewater sample was carried out in a HP 1100 chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) attached to a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with a turbospray electrospray (ESI) interface and was based on the method described in Garcia–Galan et al. [29 (link)]. The chromatographic separation was achieved using an Atlantis C18 (Waters, 150 mm × 2.1 mm, 6 µm) LC-column. The mobile phase consisted of HPLC-grade water and acetonitrile, both 0.1% in formic acid. MS/MS data acquisition was performed in the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. Instrument control and data acquisition were carried out using the Analyst 1.4.2 software package Applied Biosystems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Retinoids in Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissue processing, preparation and extraction occurred in a fume hood, under a red light. Liver tissue (500 mg) was homogenized in 1ml of Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline solution using a Precellys homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Rockville, MD). Tissue homogenate was added to a glass screw-capped tube covered by aluminum foil. After adding the internal standard (250 µl, 4,4-retinyl acetate) and 0.025 M KOH to the homogenate, retinoids were extracted in hexane, and dried under a nitrogen stream. Retinoid extracts were reconstituted in 200 µl of acetonitrile and separated by HPLC using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using Phenomenex Synergi 4 µ Max-RP 80A column (4 µm, 3×150 mm) as previously described (11 (link)). Retinol and retinoic acid were identified using a 4000 Q TRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems) coupled with the HPLC. The mass spectrometer was controlled using Analyst version 1.5.1 software and was operated in a MRM mode. Optimum positive APCI (Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization) conditions included: curtain gas, 30.0; collision gas, medium; nebulizer current, 3; temperature, 500°C; and GS1, 60. Peak area measurements were used to quantify retinoid amounts using standard curves based on retinol or retinoic acid and normalized using the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Analysis of MRSA Biofilm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedures in this section were conducted by Proteomics International Pty. Ltd. (Broadway, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009). The gel pieces were subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin after the protein spots were excised from a single representative of MRSA-527 that was grown at 48 h of biofilm formation. The peptides were extracted according to standard techniques (Bringans et al., 2008 (link)). The peptides were analyzed through LC MS/MS with Ultimate 3000 Nano HPLC system (Dionex) coupled with a 4000 Q TRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). The tryptic peptides were loaded onto a 3 μm C18 PepMap100 column (LC Packings) and separated with a linear gradient of water/acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid (v/v). The Spectra were analyzed to identify proteins of interest using Mascot sequence matching software [Matrix Science] using the Ludwig NR database. For database searching the following parameters were used: Database, Ludwig NR; taxonomy, bacteria; enzyme: trypsin; mass tolerance: ±1.2 Da; MS/MS tolerance, ±0.05Da; mass value, monoisotopic; protein mass, unrestricted; and fragment mass tolerance, ±0.6 Da. One missed cleavage and variable modifications of methionine oxidation were allowed in the analysis. Protein identification was performed based on a statistically significant MOWSE score (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Nef-Induced Proteome Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The spots showing significant down regulation upon Nef infection were identified by LC-MS/MS and further studied through bioinformatics tools. Silver stained protein spots showing differential expression pattern were picked and sent to (Proteomics International Pvt. Ltd, Nedlands, Western Australia) for doing mass spectrometry. In brief, protein samples were trypsin digested and peptides extracted according to standard techniques [30 (link)]. Peptides were analysed by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry using the Ultimate 3000 nano HPLC system [Dionex] coupled to a 4000 Q TRAP mass spectrometer [Applied Biosystems]. Tryptic peptides were loaded onto a C18 PepMap100, 3 mm [LC Packings] and separated with a linear gradient of water/acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid (v/v). The amino acid sequence tag obtained from each peptide fragmentation in MS/MS analyses was analysed to identify proteins of interest using Mascot online search engine (www.matrixscience.com) against the taxonomy set to Homo sapiens (human).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mass Spectrometry-based Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS was performed as described in www.proteomics.com and Bringans et al., 20 by Proteomics International Pty Ltd. Tryptic peptides were analysed by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (EIS) using the Ultimate 3000 nano HPLC system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a 4000 Q TRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). In the analysis, the first run of standard EIS identified the time point at which the peptide of interest was eluted during HPLC. Subsequently, a second run of EIS focusing on a selected number of most intense peaks obtained in the first run (with peaks known to be trypsin disregarded) generated the MS/MS spectrum. The MS/MS data were submitted to mascot sequence matching software (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) for comparison of the sequence of the peptide analysed with theoretical sequences found in the Ludwig NR (http://www.matrixscience.com/help/seq_db_setup_nr.html).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ISRIB Quantitative Analysis in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood and brain tissue were collected 8 or 24 h after dosing from mice treated with one doses of 0.25, 2.5 or 5 mg/kg trans-ISRIB, or vehicle. Blood plasma (up 0.2 ml, exact volume measured) was diluted with water to 0.2 ml and extracted with 0.4 ml of chloroform/methanol 2 : 1. After vortex mixing (10 min) and centrifugation (10 000 g, 10 min), the lower layer was dried with vacuum centrifugation and reconstituted in 50 μl of methanol. Brain tissue (one complete half, about 0.25 g weighed exactly) was homogenized in 0.5 ml of chloroform/methanol 2 : 1 and further processed exactly as the plasma samples. ISRIB quantitative analysis (using external standards) was performed by LC-MS/MS using a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with a turbo ion source and LC series 10 AD VP (Shimadzu). The mobile phase was a water/acetonitrile gradient modified with 0.1% formic acid using a Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 2.1 × 50 mm2 (2.7 μm), which was maintained at 40 °C. LC-MS/MS multiple reaction monitoring used a precursor ion of mass/charge ratio (m/z) 452 and a product ion of m/z 265 in positive electrospray ionization mode for trans-ISRIB. Data analysis was performed with Analyst 1.4.1 in the quantitative mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Membrane Fluidity and Lipid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane fluidity was quantified by fluorescence depolarization as described (Crockett and Hazel 1995 (link)) (see supplementary material). Change in polarization (excitation=356 nm, emission=430 nm) was measured between 2 and 40°C using a Perkin-Elmer LS-50B spectrophotometer. Temperatures were elevated at 2°C intervals (for myelin) and 5°C intervals (for synaptic membranes and mitochondria) at a rate of ~0.3°C min-1.
Lipids were extracted from myelin as described (Bligh and Dyer 1959 (link)) (see supplementary material). Extracts were sent to the Kansas Lipidomics Research Center for phospholipid analysis, and a diacyl polar lipid profile dataset was generated by quadrupole mass spectrometry using an Applied Biosystems 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer as described (Xiao et al. 2010 (link)). Relative abundances of the major phospholipid classes were compared between species. The unsaturation index (UI) was calculated as described (Grim et al. 2010 (link)). Polar lipid compositions were not analyzed in synaptic membranes due to lack of sufficient material.
Cholesterol was quantified in myelin and synaptic membranes using a Cayman assay kit and normalized to total phospholipid content, which was measured as hydrolyzed inorganic phosphate in membranes as described (Rouser et al. 1970 (link)) (see supplementary material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!