The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 plex tmt kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The 10-plex TMT kit is a multiplex labeling reagent used for quantitative proteomics analysis. It allows for the simultaneous identification and relative quantification of up to 10 protein samples in a single experiment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 10 plex tmt kit

1

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis using TMT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digested samples were concentrated by speed vac to one half the original volume prior to labeling and adjusted to 20% acetonitrile (ACN). All three biological replicates were labeled concurrently with a 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as in (Sauls et al., 2018 (link)). The TMT reagents (0.8 mg per channel) were dissolved in 42 µL of anhydrous ACN and 14 µL of this was added to each sample following the scheme in Figure 1A and allowed to react at RT for 1 hr. The labeling was quenched by the addition of hydroxylamine to a final 0.5% (v/v) concentration followed by incubation at RT for 15 min. Labeled peptides were pooled at equal peptide amounts thereby generating three 10-plex experiments, each of which was an individual biological replicate. An initial test mix for each replicate was analyzed, and the apparent peptide ratios were determined. Mixing ratios were adjusted using the information from the test mix to correct for sample losses and generate mixes with equal peptide amounts per channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplexed Proteome Labeling and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 12-species samples and spike-in metaproteome samples were labeled with the 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each TMT label reagent, 41 µL of anhydrous acetonitrile was added, and then the acetonitrile-dissolved reagent was added to 100 μg of peptides. After reaction at room temperature for 1 h, 8 µL of 5% hydroxylamine was added to each reagent tube, followed with reaction at room temperature for another 45 min. After desalting, the labeling efficiency was determined by a 2 h DDA run using LC-MS/MS. With the labeling efficiency greater than 99%, the labeled samples were mixed and desalted by Pierce C18 spin column (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteome Analysis of CRVO Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reproducibility of proteome changes in the CRVO model was verified by comparing CRVO (n = 5) vs. laser control (n = 5) with tandem mass tag (TMT)-based mass spectrometry in a separate analytical run. Eyes from eight animals were used to compare the protein profile of CRVO + aflibercept (n = 8) vs. CRVO + NaCl (n = 8) with proteomic analysis by tandem mass tag (TMT)-based mass spectrometry.
Isobaric labeling was performed with a 10 plex TMT kit from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Sample preparation for TMT-based mass spectrometry was performed as previously described [14 (link),16 (link)] with some modifications. For the experiment consisting of 16 samples, a standard was prepared by mixing equal amounts from each sample. Two groups of 10 samples, 8 experimental samples together with 2 standards, were labelled with the 10 plex kit. The standards were used for normalization of data. TMT labeling and high pH reversed phase peptide fractionation were performed as described in a previous article [18 (link)]. Then, 1 µg of fractions 2–8 was analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated microglia in lysis buffer were sonicated for 3 cycles consisting of 5 s of active sonication at 30% amplitude followed by 15 s on ice. Protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce, Cat. No. 23225). Protein digestion was performed as previously described [28 (link)]. Briefly, 6 μg of protein for each sample was reduced with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at room temperature for 30 min and alkylated by 5 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) in the dark for 30 min. Samples were then diluted (8-fold) with 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), digested overnight with Lysyl endopeptidase (Wako, Cat. No. 127–06621) at 1:100 (w/w). The peptide solutions were acidified to a final concentration of 1% formic acid (FA) and 0.1% triflouroacetic acid (TFA), desalted with a C18 Sep-Pak column (Waters, Cat. No. WAT054945) and dried down in a vacuum centrifuge (SpeedVac Vacuum Concentrator). TMT labeling of peptides was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions and as previously described [28 (link)]. One batch of 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. 90110) was used to label all 10 samples (Fig. 1b). All 10 channels were then combined and dried in a vacuum centrifuge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of CM Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins from CM were isolated by transferring the supernatant to five equivalents of ice-cold acetone. Proteins were reduced using 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), followed by 15 mM iodoacetamide blocking before trypsination overnight at 37 °C at a protein:trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) ratio of 50:1 w/w. 10 µg of the tryptic digest was labeled with a 10-plex TMT-kit (Thermo Scientific), resuspended in anhydrous ethanol, and a 40 µg sample was labeled according to the scheme in Supplementary Table 1. Labeled samples were pooled in equal ratios, dried in a vacuum centrifuge, re-dissolved in 50 µl trifluoroacetic acid solution (0.1%), purified, loaded on a reverse phase microcolumn (equal w/w amounts of Poros R2 and Oligo R3 material) and fractionated by high pH liquid chromatography as described75 (link).
The Fractions were analyzed by RP‐nanoLC‐MS/MS on an Orbitrap Eclipse mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nano HPLC interface (Dionex UltiMate 3000 nano HPLC) as described75 (link). Raw data files were quantified using Proteome Discoverer version 2.4 (Thermo Scientific) as previously described using human and bovine database searches76 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Proteomics of Aortic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aortic tissues were lysed in lysis buffer at 70 Hz for 120 s. The lysed tissue samples were centrifuged, and the supernatant was collected. The protein concentration was quantified using the Bradford method [24 (link)]. After quantification, the protein extracted from each sample was digested with 0.5 μμL−1 trypsin solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, NJ, USA). Then, TMT labelling was performed with a 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, NJ, USA). Peptides in each group were labelled with different TMT labels: three biological repeats of the wild-type mice group were labelled TMT-127N, TMT-127C, and TMT-128N; three biological repeats of the ApoE−/− group were labelled TMT-128C, TMT-129N, and TMT-129C; and three biological repeats of the berberine 156 mg·kg−1 group were labelled TMT-130N, TMT-130C, and TMT-131. All the labelled samples were mixed, vacuum dried, and stored at -20°C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tandem Mass Tag Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) was used to label the digested protein peptides according to the manufacturer’s protocol for the 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Of the 10 labels included in each kit, 6 were used per biological pool from each treatment. Labelled peptides were then purified and separated into 10 fractions by strong cation exchange (SCX) across an increasing salt concentration. The eluted peptide fractions were purified and extracted once again before being lyophilized for direct analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS).
Fractionated samples were resuspended in 100 μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and 10 μL of each of the 10 fractions was loaded onto a 50-cm EASY-spray column (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative analysis was performed using an Orbitrap Velos-Pro mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in positive ion mode. The peptides were separated by gradient elution from 5–80% 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (5–40% from 0 to 100 min, 40–80% from 100 to 110 min) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Mass spectra (m/z) ranging from 400 to 1600 Da were acquired at a resolution of 60,000, and the 10 most intense ions were subjected to MS/MS by HCD fragmentation with 35% collision energy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiplexed Proteomic Analysis of Viral Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were lysed in 2% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.2, and 100 μg of protein was reduced and alkylated with 25mM TCEP and 50mM CAM respectively for 20 min at 70°C and then digested overnight with trypsin (50:1 protein:enzyme w/w ratio) in 50 mM HEPES, pH8.2. Digested samples were concentrated by speed vac to one half the original volume and adjusted to a final concentration of 20% acetonitrile (ACN). Both biological replicates for WT and d106 viruses were labeled concurrently with a 10-plex TMT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The TMT reagents were dissolved in anhydrous ACN and 0.2mg of reagent from each channel was added to the appropriate sample for 1 hr at RT. To quench the reaction, hydroxylamine was added to a final concentration of 0.5% (v/v) and the samples were incubated at RT for 15 min. Labeled peptides were pooled at equal peptide amounts to generate each 10-plex experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!