The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using tmt10

1

Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteomics analysis was performed by the Washington University Proteomics Shared Resource (WU-PSR) using a tandem-mass-tag-based assay20 (link),25 (link). Protein samples were digested with endoprotease LysC and trypsin, labeled with tandem mass tag reagents (TMT10; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and subjected to nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (nano-LC-MS/MS) analysis. Raw data were converted to peak lists using Proteome Discoverer (version 2.1.0.81; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were identified with a Mascot search engine (version 2.6.2; Matrix Science26 (link)) and compared against a SwissProt database of Canis lupus familiaris (August 2016 version; 29,541 entries) and common contaminant proteins (cRAP version 1.0; January 1, 2012; 116 entries). Quantification of protein relative abundance was performed with proteoQ (version 1.0.0.0; https://github.com/qzhang503/proteoQ) under R (R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing; https://www.R-project.org/) and RStudio (R Studio Team; http://www.rstudio. com/); proteoQ is a tool developed with the tidyverse approach (tidyverse; https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse) under R and RStudio27 . Principal component analysis of protein log2 ratios was performed with the base R function stats:prcomp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TMT-Labeled Proteome Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were labeled with tandem mass tag reagents (TMT10) (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The eluates were transferred to autosampler vials (200046, Sun-Sri), dried and stored at −80°C until LC-MS analysis. The samples in formic acid (1%) were loaded (2.5 μL) onto a 75 μm i.d. × 50 cm Acclaim® PepMap 100 C18 RSLC column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on an EASY nanoLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a constant pressure of 700 bar with 100% A (0.1%FA). Data was acquired using a Q-Exactive™ PLUS hybrid quadrupole Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific™) in data-dependent acquisition mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In-Gel Tryptic Digestion and Peptide Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel lanes were cut into three slices covering the entire separation range (∼2 cm) and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion (Bantscheff et al., 2007 (link)). Peptides were either directly subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis or labeled via reductive dimethylation or with isobaric mass tags (TMT10, Thermo FisherScientific, Waltham, MA). Recombinant protein samples were digested in solution (2.4 M Urea, 100 mM HEPES pH8, 5 mM CAA, 1.7 mM TCEP, 0.1 μg Trypsin, 0.1 μg LysC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identifying LNP's Target in C. auris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed the PISA assay with biological triplicates to identify LNP’s target in C. auris, as previously described [30 (link)]. Briefly, C. auris AR0390 cultures were grown to the logarithmic phase in YPD and were subsequently collected, washed, and adjusted to 1 × 108 CFU/mL in PBS. Cells were treated with either LNP (64 µg/mL) or DMSO. Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Four freezing and thawing cycles were applied to obtain cellular lysates in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail. For PISA experiments, the lysates were then heated to eight different temperatures between 40.3 and 60.7 °C (40.3, 44.3, 48.3, 50.3, 52.1, 54.8, 58.3, and 60.7 °C) for 3 mins followed by incubation at 25 °C for 5 mins. The samples were ultracentrifuged at 150,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. Subsequently, the soluble protein solutions were then precipitated, reconstituted in 8 M Urea, reduced/alkylated, digested using Trypsin/Lys-C, and labelled with TMT10 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, MA, USA) as per vendor protocols for subsequent high-pH fractions and quantitative LC–MS/MS proteomics analysis. In the case of the global proteomics experiments, the same sample preparation procedure for LC-MS/MS was executed for 30 µg of total protein, excluding heat treatment and mixing. The detailed methods were adaptations from the previously reported [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplex Peptide Quantification via TMT Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel lanes were cut into three slices covering the entire separation range (~2 cm) and subjected to in-gel digestion39 (link). Peptide samples were labeled with 10-plex TMT (TMT10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) reagents, enabling relative quantification of a broad range of 10 conditions in a single experiment. The labeling reaction was performed in 40 mM triethylammoniumbicarbonate, pH 8.53, at 22 °C and quenched with glycine. Labeled peptide extracts were combined to a single sample per experiment, and subjected to additional fractionation on an Ultimate3000 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) by using reverse-phase chromatography at pH 12 [1 mm Xbridge column (Waters, Milford, MA)], as previously described44 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Using TMT10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins from each sample were processed by Filter aided proteome preparation (FASP) method [19 (link)] was used for trypsin digestion, the filtrate was collected, and the peptide was quantified (OD280). Tandem mass tags TMT10 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with varying molecular weights (126–131 Da) were used as isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification. According to manufacturer's protocols, the digested samples were individually labeled with TMT10 reagents for 1 h as follows: 100 μg of aliquots of digested peptides of the Control group, Model group, or JWDSD-H group were each labeled with a different isobaric tag (TMT126, 127, 128, 129, 130 and 131, respectively). The labeling reaction was stopped with 5% hydroxylamine. As directed, the Pierce high pH reversed-phase fractionation kit (Thermo scientific) was then used to fractionate TMT-labeled digest samples into 10 fractions using an increasing acetonitrile step-gradient elution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chemoproteomic Affinity Capture of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kinobeads
were prepared as described.31 (link),32 (link) Sepharose beads were
derivatized with 31 or 50 at a concentration
of 1 mM as described.30 (link) The chemoproteomic
affinity capturing experiments were performed as previously described.32 (link) The experimental setup was such that 10 samples
are measured in parallel (TMT 10-plex)57 (link) to generate values for the affinity of the beads to the bound proteins
and to generate IC50 values in a single experiment. Apparent
dissociation constants were determined by taking into account the
protein depletion by the beads.32 (link) Proteins
were digested according to a modified single-pot solid-phase sample
preparation (SP3) protocol.58 (link),59 (link) Peptides were labeled
with isobaric mass tags (TMT10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham,
MA) using the 10-plex TMT reagents, enabling relative quantification
of 10 conditions in a single experiment.57 (link),60 (link) LC-MS/MS measurements on Q Exactive Orbitrap or Orbitrap Fusion
Lumos mass spectrometers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was performed
as described elsewhere.61 (link) Analytical procedures
and raw data tables for the chemoproteomics experiments can be found
in the Supporting Information files 1 and 2, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tumor Proteome Sample Preparation for MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor samples for MS-proteomics were prepared as previously described35 (link). The protein fraction from the Allprep kit (Qiagen) was prepared for mass spectrometry-based proteomics using a modified version of the filter assisted sample preparation method (FASP)80 (link). Samples were mixed with 1 mM DTT, 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6 in a centrifugation filtering unit, 10 kDa cutoff (Nanosep® Centrifugal Devices with Omega™ Membrane, 10 k), and centrifuged for 15 min at 14.000 g, followed by another addition of the 8 M urea buffer and centrifugation. Proteins were alkylated by 55 mM IAA, in 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6 for 10 min, centrifuged, followed by two more additions and centrifugations with 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.6. Trypsin (Promega). 1:50, Trypsin:protein, was added to the samples in 0.250 M urea, 25 mM HEPES and digested overnight at 37 °C. The filter units were centrifuged for 15 min at 14.000 g, followed by another centrifugation with MQ. Flow-through of peptides was collected and TMT10 labeled according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo). A TMT tag with pool of all samples was used as denominator in each TMT10 to connect the different sets. TMT labeled peptides were pooled and cleaned by a strata-X-C-cartridge (Phenomenex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proteomic Analysis of Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were lysed with 4% SDS, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). EVs were lysed with 2% SDS, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM DTT. Lysates were heated to 95°C for 5 minutes followed by sonication for 1 minute, and centrifugation 14,000g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was mixed with 1 mM DTT, 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, transferred to a centrifugation filtering unit, 10 kDa cutoff (Nanosep, Pall, Port Washington, NY, http://www.pall.com), and centrifuged for 15 minutes, 14,000g, followed by another addition of the 8 M urea buffer and centrifugation. Proteins were alkylated by 50 mM indoleacetic acid (IAA), in 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES for 10 minutes, centrifuged for 15 minutes, 14,000g, followed by two more additions and centrifugations with 8 M urea, 25 mM HEPES. Trypsin (Promega, Madison WI, http://www.promega.com), 1:50, Trypsin:protein, was added to the cell lysate in 250 mM urea, 50 mM HEPES, and incubated overnight at 37°C. The filter units were centrifuged for 15 minutes, 14,000g, followed by another centrifugation with MQ, and the flow-through was collected [19 (link)]. Peptides from EVs were TMT6 labeled and MSC cells with TMT10 labeled according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, http://www.thermofisher.com). Peptides were cleaned by a strata-X-C-cartridge (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, http://www.phenomenex.com) [19 (link), 21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of hPCLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, hPCLS were washed with PBS and harvested using snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. Upon thawing, samples (two hPCLS per technical replicate) were dissolved in 300 μL of 2% SDS-H2O (with protease and phosphatase inhibitor) for 2 h at room temperature. They were then mechanically homogenised using a bead ruptor (Omni International #19-040). Before liquid chromatography with tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) analysis, protein concentrations were measured (Pierce 660 nm kit #22660). Samples were solubilised in 2×SDS sample buffer and subjected to short SDS gel electrophoresis. Samples were further processed for LC-MS/MS analysis.
SDS-PAGE gels were Coomassie stained. Gel lanes were cut into three slices covering the entire separation range (∼2 cm) and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion [29 (link)]. Peptides were labelled via isobaric mass tags (TMT10; Thermo Fisher Scientific).TMT labelling was performed using the 10-plex TMT reagents, enabling relative quantification of 10 conditions in a single experiment [30 (link)]. Briefly, the labelling reaction was performed in 40 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.53 at 22°C, and quenched with glycine. Labelled peptide extracts were combined to a single sample per experiment. Lyophilised samples were re-suspended in 1.25% ammonia in water and subjected to LC-MS/MS [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!