The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cytoscan hd microarray

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Cytoscan HD microarray is a high-density genotyping microarray designed for comprehensive genomic analysis. It provides a comprehensive view of the genome, including copy number variations and loss of heterozygosity, to support a wide range of research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using cytoscan hd microarray

1

High-resolution Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patient DNA sample was subjected to high resolution CMA using an Affymetrix platform and CytoScan HD microarrays according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 250 ng of DNA samples was digested with Nsp1, amplified with TITANIUM Taq DNA polymerase (Clontech, Mountain View, CA), fragmented with Affymetrix fragmentation reagent, and labeled with biotin end-labeled nucleotides. The DNA was hybridized to the microarray for 16 hours, washed and stained on GeneChip Fluidics Station 450, and scanned on the GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G (Affymetrix). Data analysis was performed using Chromosome Analysis Suite software version 1.2.2 (Affymetrix). These chips include 750,000 SNP and 2.6 million CNV markers that enable high resolution (25–50 kb resolution) detection of CNV, regions of homozygosity (ROH), uniparental disomy, and low-level mosaicism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic Copy Number Analysis in EOC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic copy number analysis was performed at the UNMC Sequencing Core Facility, using Affymetrix Cytoscan HD microarrays. The total number and size (segments) of CNA per sample were determined using the Affymetrix Chromosome Analysis Suite (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) Software. A CNA index was calculated for each sample based on the percent of the genome that resulted in either a copy number loss or gain. Base overlap (CNA inside hypomethylated blocks) and non-overlap (CNA outside hypomethylated blocks) between each EOC CNA segment and hypomethylated blocks was determined using the Bedtools intersect routine [92 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome-wide SNP Genotyping using CytoScan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genome-wide SNP genotyping was conducted using the CytoScan® HD microarray, which contains 743,304 SNP markers and 1,953,246 copy number markers (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to manufacturer's instructions. The average marker spacing is 1.1 kb. The signal intensity extraction and copy number alteration detection were conducted using Chromosome Analysis Suite (Affymetrix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CNV Identification and Classification in CHD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples from all cases were extracted from peripheral blood with standard procedures. CHD patients at BCH were tested on the Agilent 244 K comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array platform or a 4 × 180 K SNP + CGH microarray in a clinical diagnostic setting. CNVs were identified and evaluated as previously described
[23 ].
CHD cases at SCMC were tested on the Affymetrix Cytoscan™ HD microarray platform in a research setting. Data was visualized and analyzed by Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) software package (Affymetrix, USA) with a minimal cutoff of 20 consecutive markers for CNV calling. All CNVs reported are based on NCBI human genome build 37 (hg 19).
Detected CNVs were evaluated through a filtering procedure and classified into five categories based on the ACMG guideline
[24 (link)] (for details see Additional file
1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized Affymetrix CMA for NDDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical CMA was performed using an optimized, ultra-high-resolution custom Affymetrix microarray that includes all functional content present on the Affymetrix CytoScan-HD microarray with probes added to improve detection of copy number variants associated with pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders [4 ]. DNA samples (250 ng) were digested, processed, labeled and hybridized to microarrays using the manufacturer’s recommended protocol (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Array results were interpreted by ABMGG-certified clinical cytogeneticists using the Chromosome Analysis Suite v2.0.1 software (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). To estimate the percentage of genome homozygosity, all ROH regions greater than 3 Mb are totaled for the autosomes (X chromosome excluded to avoid male/female bias) and the total is divided by the total size of the autosomes. Samples were randomly selected for exome sequencing if the report of the clinical cytogeneticist stated ROH to be a potential concern. ROH were considered as a potential concern by the clinical cytogeneticist if the total ROH encompasses greater than 3% of the genome. Additionally, for cases with ROH between 1 and 3%, the cytogeneticist compared the ROH of the patient with common ROH in control populations and decides to flag these as concerning if there are significant disparities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Resolution Detection of Genomic Abnormalities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples of patients negative for the G2019S mutation were then screened for exon rearrangements using Affymetrix Cytoscan HD microarray according to the manufacturer’s protocol. With a median inter-marker distance of 500–600 bp, CytoScan HD offers the highest physical coverage of the genome for detecting human chromosomal abnormalities. Indeed, these chips include 750,000 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and 2.6 million copy number variation (CNV) markers that enable high-resolution (25–50 kb resolution) detection of CNVs, region of homozygosity (ROH), uniparental disomy, and low-level mosaicism. Briefly, 250 ng of DNA samples were digested with Nsp1, amplified with TITANIUM Taq DNA polymerase (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), fragmented with Affymetrix fragmentation reagent, and labeled with biotin end-labeled nucleotides. DNAs were hybridized to the microarrays for 16 h, washed and stained on the GeneChip Fluidics Station 450, and scanned on the GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G (Affymetrix). Data analysis was performed using Chromosome Analysis Suite software version 1.2.2 (Affymetrix). Data were considered significant only when they met the quality control criteria set by the manufacturer [the Median Absolute Pairwise Difference scores (MAPD) < 0.25, the Waviness Standard Deviation (WSD) < 0.12, and the SNP Quality Control (SNP-QC) > 0.15].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis of Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMA was performed using peripheral blood and examined with Cytoscan HD microarray (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). This array consists of 2,696,550 oligonucleotide probes, including 1,953,246 distinctive non-polymorphic oligonucleotide probes, and 743,304 single nucleotide polymorphism probes. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified from whole blood sample using Gentra Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Procedures for DNA digestion, adapter ligation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplicon DNA fragmentation, labeling, and hybridization of the arrays were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Results were investigated using the Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The settings for smallest copy number variation (CNV) regions in ChAS were 25 kb and 25 probes for losses, and 50 kb and 50 probes for gains. Genomic linear positions are given relative to NCBI build 37 (hg19) [12 (link)]. Results were interpreted based on published literature, publicly available databases, and by investigating gene content following practice guidelines [13 (link),14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis of Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMA was performed using peripheral blood and examined with Cytoscan HD microarray (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). This array consists of 2,696,550 oligonucleotide probes, including 1,953,246 distinctive non-polymorphic oligonucleotide probes, and 743,304 single nucleotide polymorphism probes. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified from whole blood sample using Gentra Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Procedures for DNA digestion, adapter ligation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplicon DNA fragmentation, labeling, and hybridization of the arrays were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Results were investigated using the Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The settings for smallest copy number variation (CNV) regions in ChAS were 25 kb and 25 probes for losses, and 50 kb and 50 probes for gains. Genomic linear positions are given relative to NCBI build 37 (hg19) [12 (link)]. Results were interpreted based on published literature, publicly available databases, and by investigating gene content following practice guidelines [13 (link),14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microarray-Based Genomic Profiling of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor and matched lymphocyte DNA were hybridized to the CytoScan HD microarray (Affymetrix, UK) and analyzed as described [15 (link)]. Briefly, three different software were used for calling and filtering copy number aberrations (CNA) and copy number neutral runs of homozygosity (CNN-ROH); (1) Chromosome analysis suite v3.2 (ChAS, Affymetrix, UK), (2) Rawcopy [23 (link)] and (3) Nexus Copy Number (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA). For estimating aberrant cell fraction and allele specific copy number profiles in the tumors, the Allele-Specific Copy number Analysis of Tumors 2.5.2 (ASCAT) software was used [36 (link)]. Clustering of the sample set based on CNA profiles was done with Rawcopy using the hclust R package as well as with the built-in complete linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm in Nexus Copy Number. Called variant segments from the CytoScan microarray were used for generating input for the Chromothripsis-like pattern (CTLP) scanner [39 (link)]. Identification and calculation of likelihood ratios of CTLP present in the samples were done using the website http://cgma.scu.edu.cn/CTLPScanner/ with default parameters except for the parameter of Log2 signal value difference between two adjacent segments that was set to 0.25.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genome-wide Microarray Analysis of CNVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated DNA was analyzed using the Affymetrix CytoScan HD microarray system. This platform consists of 2.67 million markers (comprised of ~1.9 million non-polymorphic copy number and ~750,000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) probes) at an average spacing of 1 probe every 800 bp throughout the entire human genome. This test compares the patient sample to control samples from the HapMap set of 270 individuals. The Affymetrix CytoScan HD microarray is a diagnostic assay used by the Greenwood Genetic Center for the identi cation of genomic copy number variations and loss of heterozygosity regions. Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) software has been utilized for the analysis of this microarray. SNP genotyping on this platform has the enhanced ability to identify long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) and uniparental disomy. All copy number changes were determined using the human genome build 19 (hg19/NCBI build 37).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!