The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in Japan

The TKK 5401 is a compact and versatile laboratory instrument designed for precise measurements. It features a high-accuracy sensor and advanced digital signal processing capabilities, enabling reliable data acquisition across a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

128 protocols using tkk 5401

1

Measurement of Handgrip Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HGS was measured three times in each hand, using a digital hand dynamometer (digital grip strength dynamometer, TKK-5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Trained medical technicians instructed the seated subjects to hold the dynamometer with the second finger nodes of the working hand at an angle of 90° to the handle and to squeeze the handle as firmly as they could. After subjects slowly stood up, HGS was measured during expiration. Between each measurement, a 60 s resting interval was allowed. The HGS value used in the analysis was the highest of the six measured values [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Grip Strength Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HGS was measured by a Takei digital grip strength dynamometer (T.K.K. 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). People without arms, hands, or fingers, people with broken fingers, people with paralyzed hands, and people with casts or bandages for their wrists or hands were excluded from measuring HGS. Participants were told to stand up and look straight ahead with both arms falling naturally. Elbows and wrists were not to be flexed, and arms not to be in contact with the participants’ bodies. The feet were to be hip-width apart and evenly spaced. The first measured HGS was for the preferred hand of the participant. In turn, the HGS of the other hand was measured. This was repeated three times to get three HGS values for each hand. After one measuring cycle, participants took a 60-s break before the next cycle of measurements. Before each measurement, participants were checked for correct posture. Each measurement took place after inhaling and the maximum HGS was measured for 3 s while exhaling. We defined HGS as the maximum value from six measured values from both hands [2 (link)]. We defined people with low HGS as having lower HGS than the sex-specific median values, <38.3 kg for men and <22.8 kg for women, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Manual Grip Strength Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The manual grip strength of the upper limbs was measured by means of a dynamometer adjusted for each type of hand, and on a scale from 0 to 100 kg. The individual was in the orthostatic (standing and upright) position with the arm to the side of the body and with the dominant side performed the grip (39 (link)). The participants performed one repetition in each hand to familiarize themselves with the device and the test. Each participant was asked to squeeze the grip with maximal strength for 3 s with the dominant hand. The highest peak strength (kg) recorded between the three attempts was considered for analysis. A digital grip strength dynamometer was used for this (TKK 5401; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Dividing the value of the best hand grip strength score by BMI (kg/m2) obtains a field muscle quality index (MQI) (40 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Handgrip Strength and Cardiovascular Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Handgrip strength was examined three times in each hand using a digital grip strength dynamometer (TKK 5401; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). All subjects were instructed to hold the dynamometer with an upright standing position to keep their arms at their sides. The subjects squeezed the dynamometer with maximum effort, which was maintained for about 3 seconds. The mean of three trials of grip strength in each hand was used[18 ]. Weight and height while wearing light-clothing without shoes, were measured and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by squared height (m). Relative handgrip strength, defined as the summation of both hands’ grip strengths divided by BMI, was used to reflect muscle strength. Relative handgrip strength was a recommended tool to measure weakness and low lean mass[15 (link)] and improved the accuracy of the cardiovascular risk estimation model in predicting cardiovascular and all-cause mortality[19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Manual Dynamometry for Grip Force Control

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A properly calibrated manual dynamometer, model TKK5401 -Takei Scientific Instruments, was used to measure grip force control using the nondominant hand. Participants had their maximum handgrip strength measured during 3 initial trials in order to establish the goal for each participant during the two phases of the experiment. The task involved the application of 50% of the maximum handgrip strength for the duration of 3 sec. with an intertrial interval of approximately 8 sec. The dynamometer display recorded the corresponding value of the handgrip force applied by the fingers on the gauntlet (expressed in kgf) for each trial. The measurement accuracy was 0.5 kgf.
Participants informed the researcher their handedness dominance and performed the task with their nondominant hand in a sitting position without observing the dynamometer display, according to the protocol proposed by Fernandes et al. 28 (link) . A digital stopwatch was also used to control the intervals between trials and the periods before and after receiving feedback.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Handgrip Strength and Body Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Handgrip strength was measured three times using a digital grip strength dynamometer (TKK5401; Takei Scientific Instruments Co, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) [29 (link)]. It was measured with the subjects in a standing position and with the arms in full extension. The participants were instructed to squeeze the dynamometer with as much force as possible, for at least three seconds, three times with each hand alternatively. A rest interval of one minute was given between each trial. Absolute handgrip strength was defined as the summation of the maximum value from each hand and was expressed in kilograms. Handgrip strength is known to be correlated with body size (BMI, weight, height). There are several studies to reduce the effects of body size on handgrip strength, such as hand grip force divided by weight, or height2, or BMI [30 (link),31 (link)]. Among these indexes, we used relative handgrip strength that is calculated as the absolute handgrip strength divided by BMI because it is previously used as an indicator for muscle strength [32 (link)]. The relative handgrip strengths were divided into sex-specific quartiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessment of Physical Function and Nutritional Status

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DXA was used to analyze the body composition, including the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), which was calculated by summing the lean masses of the bilateral upper and lower extremities [18 (link)], and were standardized by dividing with the squared height value (appendicular skeletal muscle mass/height2 (ASM/Ht2) [kg/m2]). Handgrip strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer (T.K.K.5401; Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) [19 (link)], as described previously [20 (link), 21 (link)]. Gait speed was measured using 6-meter usual gait speed (m/s), as recommended by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia [22 (link)]. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), which includes three objective physical function tests (i.e., time taken to cover 4 m at a comfortable walking speed, time taken to stand from a sitting position in a chair five times without stopping, and ability to maintain balance for 10 s in three different foot positions at progressively more challenging levels), was also measured. Subject’s nutritional status was evaluated with body mass index (body weight/height2 [kg/m2]) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment [23 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Defining Frailty Using Fried Phenotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frailty was defined using the Fried Frailty Phenotype, also called Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) Frailty Phenotype21 (link) with modified cut-offs41 (link), consisting of five components of frailty: unintentional weight loss (4.5 kg in past year), self-reported exhaustion, weakness (grip strength), slow walking speed, and low physical activity. Detailed information on above five components was described previously41 (link). Grip strength was measured two times for each hand using a digital hand grip dynameter (Takei TKK 5401; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Tokyo, Japan), and the highest value was used for the analysis. Gait speed was walking speed over 4 m using an automatic timer (Gaitspeedometer; Dynamicphysiology, Daejeon, Korea), with acceleration and deceleration phases of 1.5 m. The level of physical activity (kcal/week) was determined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and metabolic equivalent scores were derived from vigorous, moderate, and mild activities in the questionnaire. Total CHS frailty scores were calculated by assigning a value of 1 to positive responses on each of the above five components (range: 0–5). Participants were considered as frail if the total score was 3–5 and non-frail if the total score was 0–2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sarcopenia Evaluation in Lenvatinib Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As in our previous reports, the SMI was calculated by dividing the skeletal muscles mass (cm2) by the square of the height (cm2/m2) using abdominal CT performed within one month of the initiation of Lenvatinib [16 (link)]. GS was measured as an indicator of muscle strength, using a Smedley-type digital hand dynamometer (T.K.K.5401; Takei Scientific Instruments, Niigata, Japan) with the elbow straight in the standing position. The maximal strength values of two trials for each hand were averaged for the analysis. GS was measured on the day of lenvatinib initiation. The cut-off values of the sarcopenia-related factors were based on the Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease [14 (link)]. Low muscle strength was defined as a GS of <26 kg and <18 kg in men and women, respectively. Low muscle volume was defined as an SMI < 42 cm2/m2 and <38 cm2/m2 in men and women, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Physical Function in Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grip strength was measured twice in both hands at 3-minute intervals using a digital grip dynamometer (Takei TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The highest value was defined as the grip strength. The timed up and go test (TUG) was measured as the time taken in seconds for the woman to stand up from a chair without an armrest, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The short physical performance battery (SPPB) comprises 3 subtests: balance tests (side-by-side stand, semi-tandem stand, and tandem stand), gait speed test, and 5-times chair stand tests (single chair stand and repeated chair stand). Each category was scored from 0 to 4, with the total score ranging from 0 to 12 points. Each SPPB item was tested following established guidelines. Walking speed was defined as the time taken for a participant to walk the middle 4 m of a total distance of 7 m with acceleration and deceleration phases of 1.5 m each in their usual speed.[16 (link)] The 5-times chair stand test measures the time taken to stand 5 times from a sitting position from a straight-backed armchair without using the arms. The physical activity level of the participants was measured using the Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form and classified into 3 groups: high, moderate, and minimal physical activity level.[17 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!