The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Corona veo charged aerosol detector

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector is a laboratory instrument designed for the detection and quantification of non-volatile and semi-volatile analytes. It operates by ionizing and detecting charged particles in a sample stream, providing a sensitive and selective response independent of the analyte's UV or mass spectrometric properties.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using corona veo charged aerosol detector

1

Nanoparticle Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and polydispersity index of the nanoparticles was analyzed by dynamic light scattering using a Nanotrac Flex (Microtrac). The peptide content of the NPs was determined by HPLC analysis using a standard dilution of peptides based on net peptide content (15 (link)). All amounts of PLGA-NPs used in this study were calculated according to their net peptide contents except for the particles containing full NY-ESO-1 protein which the content could not be determined due to high amounts of urea and glycine contamination. IMM60 content of the NPs was determined by a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD) coupled to a DIONEX UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fischer Scientific). The NPs were dissolved in DMSO for a complete dissolution of the components and analyzed by CAD on an XSelect CSH C18 2.5 μm 3.0 × 150 mm XP column (Waters) with VanGuard Cartridges (Waters) coupled to a column heater (65°C), eluents MeOH-Formic Acid-Triethylamine (99.0/0.05/0.05 vol. %) with isocratic gradient flow rate = 1.0 ml·min−1. The quantity of IMM60 was calculated by interpolation of the standard calibration curves of IMM60 performed in the same way as for the NPs. The endotoxin content of the nanoparticles was analyzed using the gel-clot method by Eurofins PROXY laboratories, Leiden, The Netherlands, and found to be lower than 0.1 EU/mg particles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-CAD Analysis of Peptide-loaded NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IMM60 content of the NPs was determined by a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to the aforementioned HPLC system. The components of the formulation (PLGA, PVA, IMM60 and peptides) were separated by a XSelect CSH 18 column (130 Å, 2.5 µm, 3 mm × 150 mm) with VanGuard Cartridges (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a column heater (65 °C), eluents methanol–formic acid–triethylamine (99.0/0.05/0.05 vol%) with isocratic gradient flow rate at 1.0 mL/min followed by the detection of the components in the CAD system using an electrometer. The injection volume was 20 µL. The quantity of IMM60 was calculated by the interpolation of the standard calibration curves of IMM60 performed in the same way as for the NPs. Working concentrations were >40 µg/mL, while the LOD was determined as 3.7 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Trimyristin in Nanoemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The trimyristin content of unloaded nanoemulsions was quantified with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with a LPG-3400SD pump, a WPS-3000TSL autosampler, and a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The column (Thermo Fisher Scientific Hypersil Gold C18, 2.1 × 150 mm2, 1.9 μm) was kept at 25 °C and the flow rate was set to 0.3 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/tetrahydrofuran 70/30 (v/v) for trimyristin.
Samples were diluted in tetrahydrofuran/acetonitrile 50/50 (v/v) to an appropriate response; 1 μL was injected and detected at a nebulizer temperature of 50 °C. Every sample was diluted twice and every dilution measured two times (n = 4). Trimyristin amounts were calculated with the Chromeleon 7.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a calibration curve of trimyristin in different concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Reversed-phase HPLC for Mono-rhamnolipid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reversed-phase chromatography was performed for analyzing mono-rhamnolipid concentrations based on a method developed earlier (Behrens et al., 2016 (link); Tiso et al., 2016 (link)). For sample preparation, the supernatant was mixed 1:1 with acetonitrile and stored at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, the mixture was centrifuged at 16,500 g for 2 min. All samples were filtered with Phenex RC syringe filters (0.2 μm, Ø 4 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, USA). The HPLC system Ultimate 3000 with a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. For separation, a NUCLEODUR C18 Gravity 150 × 4.6 mm column (particle size: 3 mm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) was used. The flow rate was set to 1 ml min−1 and the column oven temperature was set to 40°C. Acetonitrile (A) and 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in ultra-pure water (B) were used as running buffers. The method started with a ratio of 70% buffer A: 30% buffer B and a linear gradient was applied to reach a ratio of 80:20% in 8 min. The acetonitrile fraction was increased linearly from 80 to 100% between 9 and 10 min and decreased linearly to 70% between 11 and 12.5 min. The measurement was stopped after 15 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Endogenous Surfactants in Rat Mucus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The utilized quantification method is described in detail in Klitgaard et al. [20] (link). The mucus from eight rats was used to quantify endogenous surfactants, i.e., bile salts, polar lipids, and neutral lipids, by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with charged aerosol detection (RP-HPLC-CAD). In short, the mucus samples were weighed and diluted in cold methanol containing an internal standard mix to precipitate the proteins. Following centrifugation using a Heraeus Biofuge 15 centrifuge from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Osterode, Germany) at 13,300 rpm for 10 min (16,810 × g at r max ), the supernatant was analyzed by RP-HPLC-CAD using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 pump, Dionex Ultimate 3000 Autosampler, Dionex Ultimate 3000 column compartment, and a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The sample content was separated on an ACE Excel5 SuperC18 250 × 3.0 mm column with an ACE 5 SuperC18 analytical guard cartridge from Advanced Chromatography Technologies Ltd (Aberdeen, Great Britain) using a gradient of ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4), methanol, acetonitrile, and isopropanol within 60 min. Each peak was identified through comparison to pure standard solutions of representative bile salts, polar lipids, and neutral lipids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!