The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using strata x cw

1

Multi-class Aminoglycoside Residue Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-grade acetonitrile, methanol, and isopropanol were purchased from J.T. Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium chloride, and sodium hydroxide were from POCH (Gliwice, Poland), and potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) was from Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland). Ammonium acetate, heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA), and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO, USA). Formic acid was from Fluka (Charlotte, NC, USA). Syringe 0.22 µm hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane filters were purchased from Restek (Bellefonte, PA, USA). Ultra-pure water was generated by a Millipore Milli-Q System (Millipore, Molsheim, France).
The analytical reference standards of DHSTR, GEN, KAN, NEO, PAR, STR, and SPC were purchased from Dr Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany), and AMI, APR, HYG, RIB, SIS, TOB from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Strata X (100 mg, 6 mL), Strata X-CW (100 mg, 6 mL), and Strata X-AW (100 mg, 6 mL) cartridges were from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). Oasis HLB (60 mg, 3 mL) cartridges were from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). All matrices were obtained from local supermarkets or were originating from the Polish official residue control program. Samples were analyzed to ensure the absence of aminoglycoside residues and kept frozen at −18 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analytical Method for Veterinary Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oxytetracycline (OXT), chlortetracycline (CTC), tetracycline (TC), doxycycline hyclate (DC), tiamulin fumarate (TIAM), tylosine tartrate (TYL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), lincomycin (LINCO), trimethoprim (TRIM), activated carbon, EDTA disodium salt and formic acid were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC-grade methanol, acetonitrile and octadecyl C18 40 µm Prep LC sorbent were purchased from Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands). Disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium hydroxide were from Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland), citric acid was from Acros Organic (Morris Plains, NJ, USA) and PSA Bonded Silica sorbent was from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). Purified water was prepared with a Milli-Q water system from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA).
McIlvaine-Na2EDTA buffer was prepared by dissolving 11.406 g Na2EDTA in 115.65 mL 0.2 M phosphate buffer and 184.65 mL 0.1 M citric acid. The pH was adjusted to 4.0 by adding 0.1 M citric acid or 0.2 M phosphate buffer. Three SPE cartridges were tested; OASIS HLB (60 mg, 3 mL) from Waters (Milford, MA, USA) and Strata-SAX (strong anion exchanger, 500 mg, 12 mL) and Strata-X-CW (weak cation mixed mode, 300 mg, 3 mL) both from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). An SPE manifold (J.T. Baker, PA, USA) and a pump as a vacuum source were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Desalting and Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were made salt free by passing through polymeric cartridge Strata-X-CW (Cat No. 8B-S035-JEG, Phenomenex). The cartridge was first conditioned by adding 10-ml methanol followed by 10-ml distilled water. The flow-through was discarded, and then 10 ml of the sample was added to the cartridge. The flow-through from the cartridge was collected, tested for harvesting activity and then analyzed using HPLC and HR-LC–MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Polymeric Ion-Exchange Sorbent Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Propranolol hydrochloride, methacrylic acid, dibenzylamine (DBA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EDMA), tetrabutylammonium hydroxide solution (40% in water) and inhibitor remover (Aldrich 306312) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate (NaH2PO4·H2O), tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr) and azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Acetonitrile (HPLC grade), methanol, toluene and methyl tert-butyl ether were ordered from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Water was purified with a Milli Q Direct 8 system (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). HCl was purchased from Riedel-De Haën (Seelze, Germany). The weak cation exchanger, Strata-X-CW, was obtained as a free sample from Phenomenex (Macclesfield, UK). Its binding capacity was 0.76 mol/kg according to the manufacturer.
The structure of the used compounds can be found in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sediment Multi-Analyte Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction and determination of all analytes were performed as described in previous work by Sadutto et al. (2020) . Solid phase extraction (SPE) was carried out using two different cartridges to ensure the proper recovery of all the analytes: Strata-X (33 μm, 200 mg/6 mL, polymeric reversed-phase) and Strata-X-CW (33 μm, 200 mg/6 mL, mixed mode polymeric weak cation exchange) were obtained from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). Very briefly, sediment samples were extracted with a mixture of methanol and
McIlvaine buffer (pH =4.6) and filtered, and then, the extract was diluted to 200 mL with water. These extracts (200 -250 mL of water) were used for the SPE. Analytes were eluted, evaporated and redissolved to 1 mL with mobile phase before injection.
Instrumental analysis was performed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (1260 Infinity UHPLC system) coupled to mass spectrometry with a triple quadrupole mass detector (6410 QqQ-MS) from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The ionization technique used was electrospray ionization (ESI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!