The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using nf light advantage kit

1

Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NfL was included as a secondary outcome if available. Follow-up values under treatment were assessed at the earliest time point available, but not before 3 months after treatment start. In total, follow-up values were available for 55 patients (ocrelizumab n = 23, natalizumab n = 30) after a mean time to follow-up of 9.9 months. For 30 patients (ocrelizumab n = 17, natalizumab n = 13), both baseline and follow-up values were available (mean time to follow-up = 8.8 months). NfL values were assessed from the patient’s sera using a standardized protocol described in detail previously.25 (link) NfL levels were determined in duplicates by single molecule array with an SiMoA HD-1 (Quanterix, Billerica, MA, USA) using the Nf-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All coefficients of variation (CVs) of the two replicates were below 20%, resulting in a mean intra-assay CV of 6.8%. Low and high controls, consisting of recombinant human NfL antigen, were included in each sample run to monitor plate-to-plate variation (low: mean = 3.0 pg/ml, inter-assay CV = 4.0%; high: mean = 132.1 pg/ml, inter-assay CV = 6.9%). The NfL measurements were performed blinded and without information on clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Measurement of Serum Neurofilament Light

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The frozen serum and CSF samples were allowed to come to room temperature and
sNfL measurement was performed in a single centre at a Simoa HD-1 (Quanterix,
Billerica, MA) machine with a standardized protocol and a single lotusing the
NF-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Resorufin-β-D-galactopyranoside (RGP) was incubated at 33°C for 60 min prior to
running the assay. Samples were measured in duplicates. The coefficient of
variation (CV, as a percentage) of each sample was obtained by dividing the
standard deviation of both replicates by the mean of both replicates multiplied
by 100. We obtained a mean intra-assay CV of 3.9% by averaging all individual
sample CVs. Low and high controls, consisting of recombinant human NfL antigen,
were run in duplicates together with the samples. Mean sNfL concentration of
both controls (low: 4.0 pg/ml; high: 144.8 pg/ml) were in the lot-specific
validity range depicted in the certification of analysis. sNfL measurements were
performed in a blinded fashion without information about sample data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serum pNfL Quantification by SiMoA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described for serum measurements,15 (link),16 (link) the pNfL level was determined by means of a SiMoA HD-1 device (Quanterix, Billerica, MA) using NF-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) of a single LOT according to the manufacturer's instructions. Although both the samples and the remaining kit components were allowed to come to room temperature, resorufin-β-d-galactopyranoside was incubated at 33°C for 60 minutes. Samples were then vortexed and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10,000g. Finally, all samples were measured in duplicates, and the coefficient of variation (CV, as a percentage) was obtained by dividing the SD by the mean value of both replicates multiplied by 100. Samples with a sample CV above 20% (or missing replicate result) were measured a second time. The mean intra-assay CV was 7.3%. Run-to-run variation was monitored by adding duplicates of the same 2 low and high controls, consisting of recombinant human NfL antigen, to each sample run. The mean levels over all runs were 3.0 pg/mL for the low control and 137.9 pg/mL for the high control with interassay CVs of 4.4% and 1.5%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Neurofilament Light in Sera

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NfL levels were assessed from the patient's sera at baseline and at both the first and second follow-up examination using a standardized protocol described in detail previously [Bittner et al., ]. In case of previous relapse, baseline Nfl values were assessed at least 30 days after a relapse and corresponding corticosteroid therapy. NfL levels were measured in duplicate by single molecule array with a SiMoA HD-1 (Quanterix, USA) using the Nf-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) according to manufacturer's instructions. All coefficients of variation (CV) of the two replicates were below 20%, resulting in a mean intra-assay CV of 6.3%. Low and high controls, consisting of recombinant human NfL antigen, were included in each sample run to monitor plate-to-plate variation (low: mean 4.4 pg/ml, inter-assay CV 5.7%; high: mean 140.0 pg/ml, inter-assay CV 6.0%). The NfL measurements were performed blinded and without information regarding clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Highly Sensitive sNfL Quantification by SiMoA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sNfL levels were determined using the highly sensitive single molecule array (SiMoA) technology. Samples were measured in duplicates in several rounds by SiMoA HD-1 (Quanterix, USA) using the NF-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Resorufin-β-D-galactopyranoside (RGP) was incubated at 33°C for 60 min prior to running the assay. The coefficient of variation (CV, as a percentage) of the two replicates was obtained by dividing the standard deviation of both replicates by the mean of both replicates multiplied by 100. CVs above 20% (or missing replicate result) were measured twice. Finally, the mean intra-assay CV of 5.9% was obtained by averaging all individual sample CVs. Two low and high controls, consisting of recombinant human NfL antigen, were included in each sample run to monitor plate-to-plate variation (low: mean 8.8 pg/ml, interassay CV 13.6%; high: mean 192.7 pg/ml, interassay CV 13.3%). sNfL measurements were performed in a blinded fashion without information about clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Biomarker Analysis in Sera

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

sNfL: we plan to use a single molecule array with a SiMoA HD-1 (Quanterix, USA) using the Nf-Light Advantage Kits (Quanterix) according to manufacturer’s instructions for NfL measurements to measure sNfL in sera obtained at each visit of patients.

Proteomics: Serum samples are planned to be depleted using the ProteoMiner kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After further standard processing steps such as reduction and alkylation, peptides will be collected, dried and resolved. Peptide solutions are set to be analyzed by reversed-phase chromatography coupled to ion mobility mass spectrometry with Synapt G2 Si/ M-Class nano-ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, US). Analysis is planned to be carried out using Progenesis for Proteomics (Walters) and Perseus.

Metabolomics: The exact protocol is currently under development, we aim to integrate serum sample preprocessing as an alternative to above-mentioned processing. The current goal is to base the metabolomics analysis on mass spectrometry as well.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Neurological Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were performed in duplicate using Single Molecule Array technology (Quanterix) with the commercial NF‐Light advantage Kit and GFAP Discovery Kit on a HD‐X platform according to the manufacturer’s instructions (www.quanterix.com/products-technology/assays). The inter-assay variation for NfL was 8%, based on three levels of internal quality control pools, measured in 45 runs. The inter-assay variation for GFAP was 15%, based on three levels of internal quality control pools, measured in 40 runs. The mean intra‐assay coefficients of variation (duplicate measurements) were <10% for both NfL and GFAP. Therefore, samples with too low volume for a duplicate measurement (n = 4) were also included in the analysis. Based on an in-house quality study, NfL values in heparin plasma, GFAP values in serum and GFAP values in heparin plasma were adjusted by −29, −13 and −18%, respectively, to allow comparison between measurements in heparin plasma, serum and EDTA plasma.31 (link),32 Finally, the GFAP values of the adult reference cohort were multiplied by a factor of 1.3, based on internal quality control values, to correct for inter-batch variability. All measurements were performed by certified technicians at the Neurochemistry laboratory of the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc blinded to clinical information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Plasma Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After an overnight fast, peripheral blood samples were drawn into ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) citrate vacutainer tubes and centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge. Plasma samples were then aliquoted and stored at −80°C until being retrieved and thawed on ice. Plasma biomarkers were measured using the single‐molecule array (Simoa) platform (Quanterix Corp, MA, USA) for Aβ42, Aβ40, and total tau (Human Neurology 3‐Plex A assay), and NfL (NF‐light advantage kit) at the laboratory of Wayen Biotechnologies Inc., Shanghai, China. Two quality control plasma samples were run in duplicate on each plate for each analyte. The intra‐assay coefficient of variation and the interassay coefficient of variation were all below 13.0% for the control sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sNfL of 112 patients with CIS and MS and of 62 healthy donors was measured by SiMoA technology as previously described.7 (link) Briefly, blood samples were spun at 2000g at room temperature for 10 minutes within 2 hours after withdrawal and stored in polypropylene tubes at −80°C. Serum NfL was measured by SiMoA HD-1 (Quanterix) using the NF-Light Advantage Kit (Quanterix) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were measured in duplicates, and the intra-assay coefficient of variation of all samples was 4.5%. sNfL measurements were performed in a blinded fashion without information about clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to standard procedures, ethylenediamine tetra-acetic-treated (EDTA) plasma was sampled, aliquoted, and frozen at − 80 °C. From plasma samples collected between 2002 and 2005, NfL measurements were assessed in two separate batches (5094 measurements) on a single molecule array (Simoa) HD-1 analyzer platform [19 (link)] with the NF-light advantage kit [20 (link)] at Quanterix (Lexington, MA, USA). The first batch of 2000 samples was obtained from a random selection of 1000 participants from the fourth visit of RS-I and 1000 from the second visit of RS-II. The second batch of 3094 samples was obtained from the remaining participants of these two study waves. Samples were tested in duplicate, and on each plate, two quality control samples were run. NfL was measured with the NF-light advantage kit [20 (link)]. The coefficient of variation for all available plasma samples is published elsewhere [3 (link)]. Participant’s data were excluded from the analyses when the concentration coefficient of variation exceeded 20%, when control samples were out of range, or when the duplicates or single measurements were missing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!