The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using exoab cd9a 1

1

Characterization of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ASCs were assessed for their ability to form colony-forming units (CFUs) and by their surface marker expression with antibodies specific for MSC markers CD29 (BD Biosciences, clone 18/CD29), CD44 (eBiosciences, clone IM7), and CD90 (BD Biosciences, clone 5E10)33 (link) as previously described.28 Isolated ASC EVs were negatively stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA) and viewed on a JEOL 1200EX transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA). The size and concentration of EVs was determined at ZenBio Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC) using qNano Gold (Izon Science Ltd. Christchurch, New Zealand). EV protein concentrations were determined with a Thermo Scientific™ Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). EV marker expression was determined by Western blot with either rabbit anti-CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1; System Biosciences) or rabbit anti-CD63 (EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences) antibodies followed by HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (System Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ABCA1-Labeled Exosome Capture and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial ELISA-coated plates (Bioswamp, Wuhan, China) were used for ABCA1-labeled exosome capture. A total of 100 μl of exosomal PBS solution was added to the reaction wells. After 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C, the plates were washed three times with PBS and drained; then, the RNA extraction reagent of the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (QIAGEN) was added to the wells, according to the kit instructions [16 (link), 17 (link)]. The ABCA1 (Bioswamp) and CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1, System Biosciences) ELISA tests were performed in strict accordance with the instructions of the kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exosome Protein Profiling by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and exosomes were lysed in ice-cold cell lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl (PH7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % (v/v) Triton X-100, complete™ proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche), as described previously [5 (link)]. Lysates were loaded and subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide (4–20 %) electrophoresis and electroblotted onto PVDF membranes. After blocking in 5 % non-fat dry milk, membranes were incubated with mouse anti-polyglutamine (1C2, Cat. No. MAB1574, Millipore), mouse anti-total huntingtin (4C8, Cat. No. MAB2166, Millipore) and mouse anti-mutant huntingtin (EM48; 1:1000) antibodies. Exosomes were identified with the antibodies raised against CD9 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD9A-1, Systems Biosciences), CD63 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD63A-1, Systems Biosciences), CD81 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD81A-1, Systems Biosciences) and HSP70 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-Hsp70A-1, Systems Biosciences). Membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by the addition of the chemiluminescent detection reagent (Millipore). Bands were visualized using a ChemiDoc™ XRS + system (Bio-Rad) and quantified using the image lab software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exosome Characterization from CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invitrogen TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was utilized to extract total RNA from human CD4+T cells. Using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) or miRNA 1st-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (stem-loop method; Sangon Biotech), mRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA. SYBR Premix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and an Applied Biosystems ABI Prism 7500 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were utilized for real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For normalization, U6 snRNA and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were utilized as internal controls. The data were analyzed utilizing the 2–∆∆Ct method. Table 1 provides the various primer sequences employed in this study. The WB assay was conducted according to the method described previously24 (link) and used the following antibodies: anti-CD9 (1:1000, EXOAB-CD9A-1; System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA), anti-CD63 (1:1000, EXOAB-CD63-1; System Biosciences), anti-TSG101 (1:1000, EXOAB-STG101-1; System Biosciences), anti-Calnexin (1:1000, YT0613; ImmunoWay Biotechnology, Plano, TX, USA), anti-beta-actin (1:1000; HUABIO, Woburn, MA, USA), and anti-CD46 (1:1000, ab108307; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Grayscale analysis by WB was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exosomal Protein Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were lysed in cold RIPA buffer with PMSF. The total protein concentration was determined by BCA assay. Protein samples were mixed with 5× loading buffer and separated by 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels. Then the proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, NJ, United States) and incubated with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h. Exosomes were identified using 2 positive markers including CD9 (1:1,000; EXOAB-CD9A-1, System Biosciences) and CD63 (1:1,000; EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences). Calnexin (1:1,000; YT0613, Immunoway Biotechnology) was used as a negative marker for exosomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblotting of EV Protein Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts (5 μg) of EVs, CEM (T lymphoblast) cell lysate, and two ExoQuick EV-depleted supernatant samples were analyzed using SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against known EV protein markers Flotillin1 (clone EPR6041; Abcam), CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1; System Biosciences), and the EV purity markers GM130 (ab52649; Abcam) and Apolipoprotein A1 (ab64308; Abcam). Full immunoblots are in Supp. Fig. 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exosome Characterization via Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain protein lysate cells were resuspended in RIPA buffer and exosomes in 8 M Urea + 2.5% SDS. The lysates were then separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to western blotting. Western blot analysis was performed according to standard procedures using polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and an enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare). The following antibodies were used: CD63 (EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences, 1:1000), CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1, System Biosciences, 1:500), Alix (#2171, Cell Signaling, 1:500), and TSG101 (EXOAB-TSG101-1, System Biosciences, 1:500). To test plasma samples reactivity against exosome lysate, blotted membranes were incubated with plasmas at a 1:100 dilution overnight at 4 °C and then with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG (1 h, 1:4000; GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein quantification was performed using Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's recommended Microplate assay procedure. Absorbance was measured with a SpectraMax M5 multi-mode microplate reader using SoftMax Pro data acquisition and analysis software (MolecularDevices, Sunnyvale CA). Vesicle isolates were denatured in 4x Laemmli sample buffer at 100°C for 10 minutes. Proteins were separated using 4-15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in Tris/Glycine/SDS running buffer and transferred to Immun-Blot PVDF membrane (all reagents and supplies from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Immunoblotting was performed with the following primary antibodies: CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1, System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA); TSG101 (ab125011, Abcam, Cambridge, MA); and TPM3 (H00007170-M02, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO). Blots were washed and incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham ECL, GE, Uppsala, Sweden) and detected using Pierce ECL western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with chemiluminescence-optimized autoradiography film. Densitometry analysis was performed on digitized images using NIH ImageJ image processing and analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Exosomal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (25 (link)). We used the following antibodies (in a 1:1,000 dilution): anti-CD63, anti-CD9, anti-ALIX, and anti-TSG101 (cat. nos. EXOAB-CD63A-1, EXOAB-CD9A-1, EXOAB-ALIX-1 and EXOAB-TSG101–1, respectively; System Biosciences); anti-C1q (cat. no. A200; Complement Technology, Inc.); anti-C1s (cat. no. A302; Quidel Corp.). As secondary antibodies we used IRDye donkey antirabbit (cat. no. 611-731-127; Rockland Immunochemicals), antigoat (cat. no. 925-32213; LI-COR), and antimouse (cat. no. 610-731-124; Rockland Immunochemicals) antibodies. In experiments with diabetic mice, exosomes isolated from equal volumes (0.1 mL) of control and diabetic plasma were loaded into gel for comparison. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with an Odyssey digital imaging program. We used ImageJ software to quantify the blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein quantification was performed using Pierce BCA (bicinchoninic acid) protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommended microplate assay procedure. Absorbance was measured with a SpectraMax M5 multi-mode microplate reader using SoftMax Pro data acquisition and analysis software (MolecularDevices, San Jose, CA, USA). Vesicle isolates were denatured in 4× Laemmli sample buffer at 100 °C for 10 min. Proteins were separated using 4–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in Tris/Glycine/SDS running buffer and transferred to Immun-Blot PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane (all reagents and supplies from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Immunoblotting was performed with the following primary antibodies: CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1, System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA); TSG101 (EXOAB-TSG101-1, System Biosciences). Blots were washed and incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham ECL, Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) and detected using Pierce ECL western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with chemiluminescence optimized autoradiography film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!