The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

49 protocols using epitect chip oneday kit

1

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Bcl-6 and Survivin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PBMC were isolated by density gradient separation on Lymphoprep (Axis-Shield PoC As, Norway), and cultured in the presence of Concanavalin A (0.625 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) and LPS (5 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h. Cells were then cross-linked and lysed according to EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen). After sonication to shear the chromatin, cellular debris was removed by pelleting. After pre-clearing the chromatin, 1% of the sample was removed as “input fraction”. The rest of the sample was incubated with either 2 μg anti-Bcl-6 [85 (link), 86 (link)] (N3, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or anti-Survivin [87 (link)] (10811, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). In each experiment, one sample with unspecific antibody was included as negative control for nonspecific binding. A known Bcl-6-targeted sequence within the first non-coding exon of the Bcl-6 gene was amplified and used as an internal positive control. The immune complexes were washed, the cross-links reversed and the DNA purified according to the EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen). The purified DNA was used as template in real-time amplification using different oligonucleotide pairs for p53 [52 (link)], Bcl-6 [86 (link)] and Blimp-1 [50 (link)]. PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining and quantified by the ChemiDoc equipment and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP-seq Analysis of Survivin in CD4+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP-seq analysis, CD4+ cells isolated from 12 women were stimulated with concanavalin A (ConA, 0.625 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (5 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h and pooled in 4 independent samples for DNA purification. The cells were cross-linked and lysed with the EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen), as recommended by the manufacturer. After sonication to shear the chromatin, cellular debris was removed by pelleting. After pre-clearing, 1% of the sample was saved as an input fraction and used as background for nonspecific chromatin binding. Pre-cleared chromatin was incubated with 2 μg of anti-survivin (10811, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The immune complexes were washed, the cross-links were reversed, and the DNA was purified with the EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen) as recommended by the manufacturer. The quality of purified DNA was assessed with TapeStation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). DNA libraries were prepared with ThruPLEX (Rubicon) and sequenced with a Hiseq2000 sequencing system (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Bcl-files were converted and demultiplexed to fastq with bcl2fastq (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of H3K27me3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitations were performed according to conditions suggested by the manufacturer’s EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen, GA-101) with ChIP-grade antibodies to mouse H3K27me3 (Qiagen, GAM-9205, 1:50). Briefly, formaldehyde was added to cells to cross-link proteins to DNA, and the cells were lysed in 1.5 ml lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 1% Triton X-100; 0.1% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Cell lysates were sonicated at the set of 2 s on/15 s off for three rounds using a Bioruptor ultrasonic cell disruptor (Diagenode, Denville, NJ) to shear genomic DNA to an average fragment size of 150–250 bp. Of the sample, 1% was removed for use as an input control. ChIP was performed following protocol provided by EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen) using antibodies toward H3K27Me3 (Qiagen). Anti-RNA polymerase II and control IgG were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. After washing and de-crosslinking, the precipitated DNA was purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for H3K27me3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We first used Ezh2 siRNA assays (4390771; Thermo Fisher) to knock down Ezh2 in cells and performed CHIPs according to conditions of the manufacturer's EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with ChIP‐grade antibodies to H3K27Me3 (Qiagen). Briefly, we added formaldehyde to cells to cross‐link proteins to DNA, and the cells were lysed in 1.5‐mL lysis buffer (50 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 140 mm NaCl; 1 mm EDTA; 1% Triton X‐100; 0.1% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate). Cell lysates were sonicated at the set of 2 s on/15 s off for three rounds using a Bioruptor ultrasonic cell disruptor (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) to shear genomic DNA to an average fragment size of 150 to 250 bp. Of the sample, 1% was removed for use as an input control. ChIP was performed following protocol provided by EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen) using antibodies towards H3K27Me3 (Qiagen). Anti‐RNA polymerase II and control IgG were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. After washing and de‐cross‐linking, the precipitated DNA was purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP Assay for ZNF423 Protein-DNA Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ZNF423 protein and DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated and purified using the EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (QIAGEN). Normal IgG served as negative control. PCR was performed as previously described [6 (link)]. PCR products were then loaded on 2% agarose gels for electrophoresed for 2 h in 1 × TAE buffer. PCR primers are provided in Online Resource 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enrichment of the transcription factor (TF) on the target gene promoters was investigated by ChIP assay using the EpiTect ChIP OneDay Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) following the manufacturer’s instructions with minor modifications. Briefly, formalin-fixed cells were lysed with SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, and 50mM Tris, pH 8.1) including an Xpert protease inhibitor cocktail (GenDEPOT, Katy, TX, USA). To shear chromatin to an average length of about 200–500 bp, cell lysates were sonicated using a sonicator (Branson-Emerson, MO, USA). Sheared chromatin was pre-cleared with protein agarose beads at 4 °C for 1 h and then incubated with a primary antibody (2 μg) overnight at 4 °C. The protein–antibody complex was pulled down with the protein agarose bead at 4 °C for 1 h and sequentially washed with a low-salt solution, a high-salt solution, LiCl solution, and Tris-EDTA solution twice. DNA was eluted after incubating with elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 mol/L NaHCO3) containing protease K at 45 °C for 30 min using DNA-binding beads and columns. TF binding on the target gene promoters was analyzed by qPCR. Primer sets for ChIP assay are shown in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ChIP-Seq Protocol with PU.1 Antibody

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed using the EpiTect ChIP OneDay Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications. Briefly, MM6 cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde at 37°C for 10 min before stop buffer was added to terminate the reaction. After cell lysis, cross-linked chromatin was sheared using Bioruptor Pico (Diagenode, Denville, NJ) with 30s on/30s off for 30 cycles. Pre-cleared DNA was then used for immunoprecipitation with 4 µL of PU.1 antibody (2258, Cell Signaling Technologies, Beverly, MA) or rabbit control IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 4°C overnight. For the input control, 1% of the sonicated pre-cleared DNA was saved and purified at the same time with the precipitated immune complex. Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) analysis was then performed using primers listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Elucidating Fli-1 Binding to GM-CSF Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GM-CSF promoter was screened for putative Ets DNA binding sites (EBSs) through visual inspection and utilizing the MatInspector software tool (Genomatix, Ann Arbor, MI) (35 ). Four primer pairs were designed to cover the 14 putative EBSs identified and can be found in Table 1. ChIP assay was performed using an anti-Fli-1 rabbit polyclonal antibody and normal IgG control using EpiTect ChIP OneDay Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) as described (27 (link), 30 (link)). Briefly, chromatin was isolated from cross-linked HUVECs and Jurkat cells that were immunoprecipitated by antibodies specific for Fli-1 or normal rabbit IgG as a control. After immunoprecipitation, the DNA was purified and amplified by RT-PCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Fold change was calculated using the comparative Ct method 2− (ΔΔCT), where delta Ct was the difference between IgG and Fli-1 Ct values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptional Regulation Analysis by qPCR and ChIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real Time PCR analysis was carried out as described [12 (link)]. Primers for CCNB1, PCNA and DEPP were those utilized by Wang et al. [26 (link)], Primers for DDIT4 were designed by Primer 3 (http://primer3.ut.ee/) and their sequence is: FW-GGTCACTGAGCAGCTCGAA; REV-CCTGGACAGCAGCAACAGT. Relative quantification of each target gene transcript was obtained using comparative Ct method. Reference genes (ATP5b, SDHA1, and CYC1) were selected using GeNorm (PrimerDesign Ltd, Southampton, UK). For each cDNA, the duplicate Ct values were averaged and normalized (geometric mean). The copy number was expressed relative to a calibrator sample using the 2−(ΔΔCt ± SD) method.
CHIP was performed utilizing the Epitect® ChIP One Day Kit (Qiagen, Milano, Italy) utilizing the technical conditions reccomended by the manufacturer. Immunoprecipitation was performed with an anti H3K4me3 Polyclonal Antibody (Epigentek, Farmingdale NY, USA). As irrelevant antibody we utilized a chicken alpha-GFP Antibody (Invitrogen – Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Evaluation of the immunoprecipitate was performed by qPCR utilizing the primers described in Ref. [26 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP Analysis of STAT1 and Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP analysis was performed using the EpiTect ChIP OneDay kit (Qiagen). Briefly, infected Calu3 cells were cross-linked, harvested, and frozen at −80°C. Cells were then lysed and chromatin sheared via sonication to generate chromatin fragments between 250 and 1,000 bp. Sonicated samples were then immunoprecipitated with anti-STAT1 (clone C-24; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-H3K4me3 (Qiagen), anti-H3K27me3 (Qiagen), or anti-mouse IgG (Qiagen) as a control. To determine the histone modification distribution, quantitative real-time PCR was performed targeting the 5′UTR (−750 bp—TSS [region 750 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site]) of select genes; target and primer information is included in the supplemental material. ChIP results were reported as fold difference (or differential occupancy), allowing comparison across multiple samples. For this, each sample was normalized to the input and then the fold enrichment was calculated using the ΔΔCT method. The fold difference for each gene was determined by dividing the appropriate time-matched mock by the experimental group. Finally, the fold difference values were converted to log2 and plotted. Data presented are the means ± standard errors for triplicate samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!