The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ab167264

Manufactured by Abcom

Ab167264 is a versatile laboratory centrifuge. It is capable of separating various biological samples, such as cells, organelles, and macromolecules, based on their density and size. The equipment features adjustable speed and time settings to accommodate a range of sample processing requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using ab167264

1

Western Blot Analysis of EHF, STAT3, and ACTB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were resolved using 12% SDS‐PAGE. Anti‐EHF (Abcom, ab167264), anti‐p‐STAT3 (SAB4300033‐100UG, rabbit polyclonal), anti‐STAT3 (SAB2102317‐100UL, rabbit polyclonal), and anti‐ACTB (ACTN05 [C4]) antibodies were used as primary antibodies. Protein‐blotted membranes were incubated with antibodies using Can Get Signal Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution (Toyobo) at 4℃ overnight for the primary antibodies and at room temperature for 1 hour for secondary antibodies, followed by visualization using the ECL Prime system (GE Healthcare). The protein signals were detected using LAS‐3000 (Fujifilm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating EHF and p-STAT3 in Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical GC tissue samples were obtained from patients undergoing gastrectomy at Tokyo University Hospital, with written informed consents. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue blocks of EBV(−) and EBV(+) GC were cut into 4‐μm‐thick sections. Three serial sections were prepared for each tissue block and used for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti‐EHF (Abcom, ab167264) and anti‐p‐STAT3 (SAB4300033‐100UG, rabbit polyclonal) antibodies. IHC was performed using Ventana BenchMark automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems), and visualized with OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit (760‐700; Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent experienced pathologists scored the staining as follows: 3 (strong), 2 (moderate), 1 (weak), and 0 (negative). The study design was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chiba University and the University of Tokyo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!