The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using spd m20a detector

1

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Gallic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of GA was performed by HPLC according to previously described methodology [16 (link)]. The equipment was composed by a Shimadzu SIL-20A HT auto-injector (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), a LC-20AT pump (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and a SPD-M20A detector (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Chromatography was performed with a LiChrospher® 100 RP-18e column (5 μm, 250 x 4 mm) and an RP-18 pre-column cartridge. The mobile phase was composed by 97.5% of water with 2.5M ortophosphoric acid and 2.5% of acetonitrile (v/v). Flow rate was 1ml/min. An aliquot of 40μL of the sample was injected and analyses were performed using the LC real time analysis software. A retention time of 9 min was observed for GA. Nine points of the standard solutions were prepared for determination of a calibration curve with concentrations between 0.5–200 μg/ml. Three levels of control solution (low, intermediate and high) were also prepared. Analytical curves were adjusted by linear regression using 1/X2 as a weighing factor, where X was the GA concentration. Standard calibration curves were linear with R2 higher than 0.99. The accuracy and precision of the quantitative analysis methodology were lower than 15% for all levels of control (intraday and interday).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phytochemical Profiling and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of the seven phytochemical compositions, SIL‐20A HPLC (Shimadzu) instrument was equipped with an SPDM20A detector (Shimadzu). The detection wavelengths were 209 nm (limonin), 224 nm (synephrine), 283 nm (hesperidin), and 330 nm (tangeretin, 5‐HPMF, nobiletin, and HMF). The standard solution of the above seven compounds was then diluted with methanol to appropriate concentrations to construct the calibration curves. At a temperature of 30°C with an injection volume of 10 μl and eluent flow rate of 1.0 ml·min−1, separations were conducted using a Diamonsil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase contained phosphoric acid water solution, pH = 3.70 (A) and methanol/acetonitrile (B, v/v = 1/1), with the following gradient variations: 0–5 min, 95% A; 5–10 min, 95%–45% A; 10–15 min, 45%–40% A; 15–20 min, 40%–35% A; 20–25 min, 35%–25% A; 25–30 min, 25%–15% A; 35–40 min, 15%–5% A. Linearity of the response, stability, precision, repeatability, and recovery verified by utilizing the HPLC–PDA method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEC Analysis of CytcO-SMA Nanodiscs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SEC analysis of CytcO-SMA nanodiscs was performed on Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare) linked to the Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system with SIL-20 A Autosampler and SPD-M20 A Detector. Buffer B (see above) was used as a liquid phase. A gel filtration calibration kit, HMW (GE Healthcare) was used for the calibration of the column. The data are shown in Fig. S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Determination of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic determinations were performed using a HPLC system equipped with a LC-20AT quaternary gradient pump, DGU-20A5 degasser, SIL-20A autosampler, CTD-10ASvp thermostatted column compartment, CBM-20A communication bus module, and SPD-M20A detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Chromatographic separation was performed using an Agilent 5 TC-C18(2) column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The mobile phase components were 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The following gradient elution program was used: 0~13 min, 89~85% A; 13~25 min, 85~75% A; 25~27 min, 75~73% A; 27~45 min, 73% A. The column temperature was set at 32 °C and the injection volume was 10 μL. Additionally, the chromatographic data at a wavelength of 325 nm were applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Organic Acids by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of organic acids by Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was performed as described previously [34 ] with some modifications. The mobile phase was 3 mM sulfuric acid aqueous solution. Sample (20 µL) was separated on a column set at 42 °C with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min; and the absorbance at 215 nm was monitored by an SPD-M20A detector (Shimadzu, Japan). The HPLC system consisted of two pumps (LC-20 AT, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), a degasser (DGU-20A, Shimadzu), an autosampler (SIL-20 A, Shimadzu) and a column oven (CTO-20A, Shimadzu). Chromatograms were evaluated with the Clarity software package (LabSolutions, Shimadzu). This method was termed as HPLC method 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Tropane Alkaloids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracts obtained from plant sample were prepared in HPLC-grade methanol for quantitative analysis. Standard scopolamine (0.6 mg/5 mL) and atropine (1.0 mg/5 mL) were prepared in HPLC-grade methanol. Analysis was performed with a Shimadzu (Nexera) HPLC system equipped with LC-30AD Liquid Chromatograph, SIL-30AC Autosampler, SPD-M20A Detector, CBM-20A Communication Bus Module, CTO-20AC Column Oven and Lab solutions software. All samples were filtered through 0.45 μM (Millipore, Bedford, MA) filter. Extracts were separated on a RP-18 (4 × 250 mm, 5 μm; Merck, Bangalore, India) column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.05 M KH2PO4 in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The gradient system was as follows: at 0 minutes 10% B, at 20 minutes 60% B, at 23 minutes 60% B, and at 25 minutes 10% B. The samples were analyzed at 30°C to provide efficiency to the peaks and the UV chromatograms were recorded at 210 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Flavonoid Glycosides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was carried out on a Shimadzu CBM-20A liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu Europa GmbH, Duisburg, Germany) equipped with an SIL-20AC auto sampler and a CTO-20AC column oven. Detection was carried out using a Shimadzu SPD-M20A detector. The system was interfaced by Shimadzu LC solution software. Chromatography was carried out on a Phenomenex Luna C18(2) column (100 Å, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) (Phenomenex, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). Columns were maintained at a temperature of 40 °C. Eluents were (A) 0.5% aqueous formic acid and (B) 0.5% formic acid in MeCN/water (6:4), and the flow rate was 1 mL min−1. A 20 μL sample was injected into the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Following is the elution program used: 100% A to 60% A in 40 min, 60% A to 50% A in 10 min, 50% A to 30% A in 10 min, and then isocratic elution for another 10 min. The column was washed with 100% MeCN and re-equilibrated with 100% eluent A before the next injection. Quantification was performed with calibration curves (0–50 μg mL−1) constructed with kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (R2 = 0.9999), rutin (R2 = 0.9990), and pelargonin (R2 = 0.9999).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytisine Quantification in Capsules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten capsules were weighted, and the average capsule mass was calculated. A quantity of powder equivalent to one capsule containing 1.5 mg of cytisine was transferred into a 50 mL volumetric flask. To this flask, 50 mL of methanol were added, and the solution was shaken for 10 min. From this solution, aliquots of appropriate volume were transferred to 10 mL volumetric flasks and diluted with methanol to obtain a final concentration of 20 µg/mL of cytisine. Twenty microliters of solution were injected into the column. The measurements were performed in triplicate.
Standard curve was prepared using seven concentration: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 μg/mL in triplicate LOD and LOQ were calculated according to the formula: LOD = 3.3 (SD/S), and LOQ = 10 (SD/S), where SD is the standard deviation of response (peak area) and S is the slope of the calibration curve.
Linearity was determined by injections of above solutions in triplicate. The average peak areas were plotted against concentrations. The linearity was evaluated by calculating coefficient of correlation, slope and intercept.
The specificity was evaluated to ensure that there was no interference from the excipients present in the capsules. Peak purity was confirmed by comparison of investigated drug UV spectra (Shimadzu SPD-M20A detector (Shimadzu Corporation, Canby, OR, USA)) with the spectra of standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spectroscopic Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IR spectra were recorded as ATR-FTIR spectra using a Perkin-Elmer UART TWO FT-IR-spectrometer. The UV/VIS spectra were recorded in high-purity solvents (UVASOl®) using the JASCO double-beam photometer (V-630). NMR spectra were recorded in MeOD using a Bruker NEO-500 instrument operating at 500 and 125 MHz for 1H and 13C{1H} NMR, respectively. Spectra referencing was accomplished using the CD2HOD solvent peak for 1H and the CD3OD solvent peak for 13C NMR spectra (δ = 3.31 and 49.0 for 1H and 13C{1H} signals, respectively). Multiplicities in 1H NMR spectra were described using the common descriptors s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), or m (multiplet). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained by EI-TOF (70 eV) using Waters Micromass instruments. Reversed-phase semi-preparative HPLC was performed on Shimadzu LC-20AP pump equipped with DGU-20A5R degassing unit, a Shimadzu SPD-M20A detector, a Shimadzu SIL-20ACHT auto-sampler and a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (10 × 250 mm, 10 μm). Data were recorded and analyzed using LabSolutions software. For column chromatography, Silica gel 60 (0.063–0.2 mm, Macherey-Nagel) was used as solid matrix. TLC was carried out on precoated Silica gel 60 plates (0.20 mm). Compounds were visualized under UV light and further by spraying with H2SO4–EtOH (1:9, v/v). All solvents used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin–Elmer Model 343 polarimeter (Waltham, MA, USA). CD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-815 spectrophotometer in 1-cm cuvettes at room temperature. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded in deuterated dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6) on an UltraShield Plus system (Bruker Biospin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 700 MHz for 1H and at 175 MHz for 13C.
HPLC was carried out using a Phenomenex Jupiter Proteo column (Jupiter Proteo 90 Å, 250 × 10mm, 4 μm; Torrance, CA, USA) on a Shimadzu HPLC-LC-20 AD series binary gradient pump and a Shimadzu SPD-M20A detector (Tokyo, Japan). Columnchromatography (CC)was carried out on Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) using ethanol as the eluent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!