The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

96 well genomic dna extraction kit

Manufactured by Favorgen Biotech
Sourced in Canada

The 96-well genomic DNA extraction kit is a laboratory equipment designed for the efficient extraction of genomic DNA from a variety of sample types. It utilizes a standardized protocol to ensure consistent and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using 96 well genomic dna extraction kit

1

Multilocus Microsatellite Genotyping of Mussels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From each sample, between 24 and 67 specimens were selected randomly and genomic DNA was isolated from the adductor muscles by using a 96‐well genomic DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (FAVORGEN Biotech Corp). DNA concentration was measured on a Nanodrop and diluted to 10 ng/μl. Two multiplex sets of four markers were used (set1: Med367, Med379, Med722 and Med733; set2: Med737, Med740, Med747 and Me15/16). Markers were used individually in the PCR (polymerase chain reaction), pooled per set and analysed on an ABI3730 DNA Analyser. Seven markers were microsatellite loci as described by Lallias, Stockdale, and Boudry (2009) and the Me15/16 locus targeted a part of the adhesive protein gene, which partially discriminates between M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus (Inoue, Waite, Matsuoka, Odo, & Harayama, 1995). Marker information, PCR conditions and multiplex conditions are detailed in Table 2. The GeneScan 500 LIZ marker was used as an internal marker. Allele calling was performed in genemapper version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems 2004).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Malaria Infection Detection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the QIAamp 96 DNA blood kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) or the 96-well genomic DNA extraction kit (Favorgen, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer instructions. The presence of P. falciparum and P. vivax infections was determined by a post-PCR, ligation detection reaction—fluorescent microsphere assay (LDR-FMA: 2006 surveys) [30 (link)] and a qPCR assay (2010 survey) [31 (link), 32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Malaria Parasite Detection via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole blood samples, stored at −20 °C in microtainers were transferred on dry ice to the laboratory at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. DNA extraction from 200 to 300 μl of each blood sample was carried out using the Favorgen 96-Well Genomic DNA Extraction Kit, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Malaria parasite infection was first identified by the QMAL assay, a genus-specific probe-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting a conserved region of the 18S rRNA genes of Plasmodium [21 (link)], by using 4 μl of purified DNA equivalent to 8 μl of whole blood. For positive samples by QMAL, 4 μl DNA was subjected to species-specific 18S qPCR assays to detect P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae as previously described [22 (link)]. For P. falciparum, the varATS qPCR assay was used [23 (link)]. Plasmodium knowlesi was detected with (forward primer: 5′-GTT AGC GAG AGC CAC AAA AAA GCG AAT-3′, reverse primer: 5′-ACT CAA AGT AAC AAA ATC TTC CAT A-3′, and hydrolysis probe: 5′-HEX-TGC TTT ATG TGC GCA TCC TCT ACC TA-BFQ-3′). All qPCR assays were performed with iTaq™ Universal Probe Supermix 2× on a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Detection and Genotyping of Malaria Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Laboratory methods described elsewhere were used [25 (link)]. In brief, DNA was extracted from 200 μL of pelleted blood, using the Favorgen 96-well genomic DNA extraction kit and eluted in 200 μL of buffer. P. falciparum and P.vivax, as well as Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale (during the 2010 and 2014 surveys only), were quantified by highly sensitive qPCR assays, using 4 µL of DNA, corresponding to 4 µL of blood [26 (link)]. A dilution of plasmids containing the target sequence of the PCR was run as an external standard for absolute quantification. P. falciparum–positive samples were genotyped by msp2 [22 (link), 27 (link)], and P. vivax–positive samples were genotyped by msp1F3 and MS2 [28 (link), 29 (link)].
For gametocyte detection, RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy 96-kit, with additional DNAse treatment to remove residual DNA (Qiagen RNase-Free DNase Set). pfs25 and pvs25 transcripts were detected using published reverse-transcription qPCR protocols [30 (link)] and were quantified using plasmids to generate an external standard curve. A genus-specific qPCR assay [30 (link)] was run to ensure absence of DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Malaria Parasites by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood slides were examined (minimum of 200 high-powered fields) independently by two experienced microscopists with discrepancies adjudicated by a third microscopist. Parasite densities were calculated from the number of parasites per 200 or 500 white blood cells (WBCs) (depending on parasitaemia) and an assumed total peripheral WBC count of 8,000/μL [34 (link)] with the final density taken as the arithmetic mean of the two values.
DNA was extracted from the equivalent of 200μL blood using the Favorgen 96-well Genomic DNA Extraction Kit and eluted in 200μL buffer. A genus-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) that amplifies a conserved region of the 18S rRNA gene was run on all samples [33 ]. For P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale species typing, species-specific qPCRs were run as described [35 ]. The 18S rRNA gene amplified by qPCR is present in 3 copies per genome. Copy numbers were quantified based on serial dilutions of plasmid controls run in parallel. The detection limit (defined as >50% of plasmid standards positive) was 1–2 copies per μL for all qPCRs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!