The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Er 2 transducers

Manufactured by Etymotic Research

The ER-2 transducers are a type of in-ear audio equipment designed and manufactured by Etymotic Research. They are professional-grade transducers that provide accurate sound reproduction and are primarily used for audiometric and hearing research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using er 2 transducers

1

Ipsilateral DPOAE Measurement with Contralateral Noise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven frequencies were used as ipsilateral primary tones, delivered to the right ear, for eliciting DPOAEs at different positions of the cochlea (f2 = 1,440, 2040, 2,884, 4,080, 5,769, 6,125 and 8,160 Hz), while contralateral broad-band noise (~ 60 dB SPL) was delivered to the left ear. Both stimuli were digitally generated by two synchronized PCI boards (6,071-E, National Instruments) at 100,000 samples/s, attenuated with PA-5 programmable attenuators (System 3, Tucker-Davis Technologies) and delivered through ER-2 transducers (Etymotic Research) sealed to both external auditory meatus and pinna. Primary tones were presented at a rate of 4 Hz with a duration of 15 ms, 5 ms rise/fall time, a fixed ratio of f2/f1 = 1.25 and L1/L2 = 65/60 dB SPL, with a delay of 200 ms. Contralateral non-continuous broad-band noise (BBN, 0.2–10 kHz) was delivered at a presentation rate of 4 Hz with a duration of 170 ms. At the beginning of each experiment sound pressure level calibrations were made in both ears using an Etymotic® microphone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency OAE Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The general swept-tone SFOAE procedure is detailed in a previous report
(Mishra & Talmadge 2018 (link)). SFOAE
measurements were performed using an ER-10B+ probe microphone system with ER-2
transducers (Etymotic Research, Elk Grove Village, IL). Stimulus calibration in
the ear canal was performed using a depth-compensated technique (Lee et al. 2012 (link); Mishra & Abdala 2015 ). Probe and suppressor tones, at 40 and 60
dB SPL respectively, were swept at a rate of 0.188 octaves/s in a two-interval
paradigm. The suppressor frequency was 1.1 times higher than the probe
frequency. The sweeps consisting probe only, and both probe and suppressor tones
were interleaved, and the phase was inverted for every other use of the
suppressor. SFOAEs were estimated from at least 8 probe and
probe-plus-suppressor pairs using a least-squares fit method. The least-squares
fit models both probe and suppressor sweeps and estimates SFOAEs to minimize the
sum of the squared error between the model and the response. The noise floor is
estimated from the average of pairwise sweep difference obtained by subtracting
the probe from the probe-plus-suppressor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!