The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using di nanoscope multi mode 5 system

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM and EDS were analyzed for microstructure and composition on the JEM-2100F electron microscope operated at 200 kV. STEM and element mapping scanning were obtained on field-emission Magellan 400 microscope under the FEI Company. XRD pattern was recorded on a Rigaku D/MAX-2200 PC XRD system. XPS spectrum was recorded on ESCAlab250 (Thermal Scientific). DLS and Zeta potential were tested on Zetasizer Nanoseries (Nano ZS90, Malvern Instrument Ltd.). AFM images were collected on the Veeco DI Nanoscope Multi Mode V system. UV-vis-NIR absorption spectra were recorded on UV-3101 Shimadzu UV-vis-NIR spectrometer. FTIR pattern was recorded for the analysis of chemical bonds. The quantitative analysis of Fe element was conducted on inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Agilent 725, Agilent Technologies). Raman spectroscopy pattern was collected on a DXR Raman microscope (Thermal Scientific, USA). ESR spectrum was measured using DMPO as the nitrogen trapping agent by Bruker EMX1598 spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained with a Zeiss Supra 40 scanning electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) observations were performed with a Hitachi H-7650 microscope at 100 kV and a JEOL ARM-200F transmission electron microscope at 200 kV, respectively. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and energy filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM) were carried out on a JEOL ARM-200F transmission electron microscope. XRD patterns were recorded on a PW1710 instrument with CuKα radiation λ = 0.15406 nm. XPS spectra were obtained with an ESCALab MKII X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using a Mg Kα radiation excitation source. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a UV-2501PC/2550 spectrometer (Shimadzu Corp., Japan) at room temperature. The infrared spectra were measured on a NICOLET Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, using pressed KBr tablets. The atomic force microscopy study in the present work was performed using a Veeco DI Nano-scope MultiMode V system. The BET measurements were determined using Micromeritics ASAP-2000 nitrogen adsorption apparatus. Raman spectra were obtained with a confocal laser microRaman spectrometer (LABRAM-HR, JY Co.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Boron Phosphide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XRD data were obtained on a Rigaku B/Max-RB diffractometer with a Cu Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 40 mA over a 2θ range of 10–80°. TEM and HRTEM images were recorded using a Tecnai-G2-F30 field-emission TEM with an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy and EDX maps were obtained on an FEI Titan operated at 200 kV. XPS was obtained by using a KRATOS Axis ultra-DLD X-ray photoelectron spectrometer with a monochromatized Mg Kα X-ray source (hν = 1,283.3 eV). The binding energy C 1s peak from surface adventitious carbon (284.8 eV) was adopted as a reference for the binding energy measurements. AFM was performed by means of a Veeco DI Nanoscope Multi Mode V system. UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectra were obtained with a Shimadzu UV-3600 UV-vis-IR spectrophotometer. BaSO4 was used as a reflectance standard. Micro-Raman spectra were obtained using a LabRam HR800 Jobin-Yvon spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 633 nm. The TGA of BP was executed via a STA449F3 simultaneous thermal analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Micro-Morphology Analysis of MXenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The micro-morphology of Nb2C and Ta2C MXene was determined by FEI Magellan 400 field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) images were performed on a JEM-2100F field emission source transmission electron microscope (200 kV). The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were made using a Rigaku D/MAX-2200 PC XRD system (parameters: Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54 Å, 40 mA and 40 kV). And the Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCAlab250 provided the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Atomic force microscope (AFM) images were measured by a Veeco DI Nanoscope Multi Mode V system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!