The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nuamp

Manufactured by Compumedics
Sourced in United States, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Germany

NuAmps is a high-performance amplifier designed for laboratory applications. It features 40 EEG/EP/ERP channels with 22-bit resolution and a sampling rate of up to 20 kHz per channel. The device provides accurate and reliable data acquisition for a wide range of research and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using nuamp

1

Neuroscan NuAmps: The Gold Standard Neuroimaging System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NuAmps (Compumedics Neuroscan, Dresden, Germany) was used as the gold standard system (GS) [25 (link),26 (link),27 (link),28 (link),29 (link)]. A search on Google Scholar for the keywords “Compumedics Neuroscan NuAmps” returned 395 results. It was connected to a computer via a USB cable and data were recorded with the Acquire software (Compumedics Neuroscan, Dresden, Germany). As per standard data collection protocols, the sampling rate was set at 500 Hz [25 (link),26 (link),27 (link),28 (link),29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electroencephalography Protocol for Cognitive Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous EEG activity was recorded from 64 Ag/AgCl electrodes at standard 10/20 locations using NeuroscanTM (SCAN version 4.3.1) with a SynAmps2 amplifier, with a vertex midline electrode position halfway between Cz and CPz as reference. For five trained and five control participants, continuous EEG activity was recorded using the NuAmps (NuAmp, Neuroscan, Inc., El Paso, TX, United States) single-ended, 40-channel amplifier according to the NuAmps International 10–20 electrode system using a Quikcap with sintered Ag/AgCl electrodes, and a continuous acquisition system (Scan 4.3 Acquisition Software, Neuroscan, Inc.). A right mastoid electrode was used as a reference. For all participants, four additional electrodes were placed on the outer canthus of each eye and on the supra and infraorbital ridges of the left eye to monitor eye movement and blink activity. Data was sampled at 1000 Hz with a 100 Hz low pass filter (time constant: DC). Electrode impedances were kept below 5 kΩ for most electrodes.
The experiment took place in a dimly lit, sound-attenuating booth. A Pentium 4 PC running E-Prime 1.1 (Schneider et al., 2002 ) recorded behavioral data and presented auditory stimuli. Responses were registered using a keyboard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EEG Recording of Cortical Potentials in CI Users

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants wore a 40-channel Neuroscan quick-cap (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan, Inc., Charlotte, NC) for the EEG recording. The cap was placed according to the International 10-20 system. Electro-ocular activity (EOG) was monitored so that eye movement artifacts could be identified and rejected during the offline analysis. Electrodes located directly over or closely surrounding the implant transmission coil were not used. Electrode impedances for the remaining electrodes were kept at or below 5 kΩ during EEG recordings using the SCAN software (version 4.3, Compumedics Neuroscan, Inc., Charlotte, NC) with a band-pass filter setting from 0.1 to 100 Hz and an analog-to-digital converter sampling rate of 1000 Hz.
CI users were presented with 400 trials for each type of the stimuli. Previous study showed that 400 trials were adequate for obtaining an ideal signal-to-noise ratio in the recording of cortical evoked potentials in CI users (Han et al., 2016 (link)). During testing, participants were instructed to avoid excessive eye and body movements. Participants read self-selected magazines to keep alert and were asked to ignore the acoustic stimuli. The total recording time was approximately 1.4 hours for each CI ear.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Frequency Change Detection in Cochlear Implant Users

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroencephalographic recordings were administered using the Neuroscan system (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan, Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States) with a 40-electrode cap in accordance with the International 10–20 system. The stimuli, created in a similar way as the stimuli in the FCDT test, were 1-s 0.25 kHz tones containing an upward frequency change of 0%, 10% or 50% at 0.5 s after the tone onset. Due to time constraints, only one base frequency (0.25 kHz) was used to minimize EEG testing time (approximately 1 h including the time for EEG cap placement and EEG recordings) for the participants. The 0.25 kHz is mapped to the first electrode in Cochlear devices and it is within the range of fundamental frequencies of human voice. CI users were presented with 400 trials for each type of the three stimuli (0%, 10%, and 50% change), with the inter-stimulus-interval at 0.8 s. The order of the stimuli was randomized. During testing, participants were instructed to avoid excessive eye and body movements. Participants read self-selected books or watched movies with closed captioning to keep alert and were asked to ignore the acoustic stimuli.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multichannel EEG Acquisition Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 40 channel EEG Quik-Cap (Compumedics Neuroscan, Dresden, Germany) was fastened below the chin of participants with the Cz electrode positioned midway between the nasion and the inion (sagittal plane), and midway between each tragus (coronal plane). Skin was lightly abraded using a sterile blunt needle. Conductive gel was inserted into 12 electrodes, FP1, F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4, according to the international 10–20 system, as well as a reference electrode on the right mastoid and a ground electrode on the right forehead (Ag/AgCl electrodes, Compumedics, Neuroscan). Impedance remained below 5 kΩ. EEG signals were digitised via a 40-channel EEG amplifier (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan, Dresden, Germany) with a sampling rate of 500 Hz, 32 bits accuracy and recorded in SCAN software (Compumedics Neuroscan, Dresden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EEG Signal Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG signals were recorded with a 33-channel Quick-Cap connected to a 40-channel NuAmps (NeuroScan Amplifier, Compumedics Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA). The layout of the electrodes followed the International 10–20 system (Figure 2), where A1 and A2 were reference electrodes, the ground channel was at the forehead, and the remaining 30 electrodes were used for recording EEGs. Impedance was kept below 10 kOhm by applying Electro-Gel (Compumedics Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA) to the electrodes. Ocular activity (i.e., electrooculography, EOG) was monitored with two electrodes placed above the left eye and the right side of the right eye, respectively. The recorded EEG and EOG signals were amplified and filtered (0.5–100 Hz), and then digitized with a sampling rate of 500 Hz using the NuAmp amplifier from NeuroScan Inc. Ocular artifacts coming from blinking or eye movements were removed from the EEG signals using the artifact removal software from NeuroScan (Scan4.5). Afterward, the EEG signals were further filtered using a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter (0.5–50 Hz). Finally, other possible artifacts caused from generic discontinuities and electromyography were removed using the independent component analysis (ICA) and ADJUST algorithm (Mognon et al., 2011 (link)) provided in the EEGLAB (Infomax ICA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

EEG Recording of Auditory Perception

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The participant was comfortably seated in a sound-treated booth for the EEG recordings. Prior to the EEG experiment, multiple trials of stimuli were presented to ensure that the participant was able to reliably detect all types of changes in the tones. EEG recordings were collected using a 40-channel Neuroscan system (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan, Inc., Charlotte, NC), with a band-pass filter setting from 0.1 to 100 Hz, an analog-to-digital converter sampling rate of 1000 Hz, and the linked ear as the reference. Before EEG recordings, the Quick-cap with 40 electrodes was placed on the participant’s scalp according to the international 10-20 system and required procedures were taken to ensure that electrode impedances were no greater than the recommended level (i.e., 5 kΩ). During testing, participants read self-selected magazines or watched a captioned movie to keep alert and were asked to ignore the acoustic stimuli. They were also instructed not to move their heads during the EEG testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

EEG responses to cochlear implant stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were seated on a comfortable chair in a sound-treated booth for the experiments. A 40-channel Neuroscan multi-channel EEG system (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan, Inc., Charlotte, NC) was used to record the EEG. Electro-ocular activity (EOG) was monitored so that eye movement artifacts could be identified and rejected during the offline analysis. The continuous EEG data were recorded with a band-pass filter setting from 0.1 to 100 Hz and a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz. The average electrode impedance was lower than 10 kΩ. EEG signals from a total of 1–3 electrodes over the CI coil were not available.
During testing, participants were instructed to avoid excessive eye and body movements. Participants read self-selected magazines to keep alert and were asked to ignore the acoustic stimuli. A total of 400 trials of each of the three types of stimuli (three frequency changes: 0%, 5%, and 50%) were presented. The stimulus conditions were randomized to prevent order effects. The inter-stimulus interval was 800 ms. Each CI ear was tested separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

EEG and ERP Recordings: Standardized Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG and ERP recordings were performed using a standardized methodology and platform (Brain Resource Ltd., Australia). Details of this procedure have been published elsewhere [24] (link), [42] (link).
In summary, participants were seated in a sound and light attenuated room, controlled at an ambient temperature of 22°C. EEG data were acquired from 26 channels: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, FC3, FCz, FC4, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, CP3, CPz, CP4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, Oz and O2 (Compumedics Quikcap and NuAmps amplifier; 10–20 electrode international system). Data were offline referenced to averaged mastoids with a ground at Fpz. Horizontal eye movements were recorded with electrodes placed 1.5 cm lateral to the outer canthus of each eye (bipolar). Vertical eye movements were recorded with electrodes placed 3 mm above the middle of the left eyebrow and 1.5 cm below the middle of the left bottom eyelid. Skin resistance was <5 kOhms for all electrodes. A continuous acquisition system was employed and EEG data were EOG corrected offline [43] (link). The sampling rate of all channels was 500 Hz. A high cut-off filter at 100 Hz was employed prior to digitization. P300 latency and amplitude were quantified at Pz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Paired Inspiratory Occlusion Protocol for EEG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An electrode cap based on the International 10–20 system was positioned on the subject's head by the experimenter. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the electrode sites of the cap. For a detailed review on the EEG setup, please refer to Chan and Davenport's (2008 (link)) review. Before the recording, the subjects were familiarized with the sensations of the paired inspiratory occlusions. Two inspiratory occlusions of 150 ms each, with a 500 ms inter-stimulus-interval, were provided randomly every 2–4 breaths. The onset of occlusion was identified as the start of mouth pressure change (Labchart V7, ADInstruments Inc., Bella Vista, Australia). Approximately 100 paired occlusions were provided during each of the two trials. The trigger box was sending parallel markers to the EEG recording software (Neuroscan 4.5, Compumedics Neuroscan Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA). The continuous EEG was sampled at 1 kHz with a 40-channel EEG system (NuAmps, Compumedics Neuroscan Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA), bandpass filtered from DC to 50 Hz and referenced to the bilateral mastoids. Individual electrode impedance was set below 5 kΩ. After each trial, the subjects were rating their subjective feeling of breathlessness with a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = not at all breathlessness, and 100 = maximal level of breathlessness).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!