The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pfu ultra 2 polymerase

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

Pfu Ultra II polymerase is a high-fidelity DNA polymerase designed for accurate amplification of DNA. It exhibits efficient 3' to 5' exonuclease activity, resulting in an error rate that is significantly lower than Taq DNA polymerase.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using pfu ultra 2 polymerase

1

Promoter Analysis of MEOX1 Regulated by PBX1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Promoter constructs of MEOX1, a downstream gene of PBX1, were generated based on the location of the PBX1 binding motif at -181 bp (TGATGATTAAT) from the TSS. A 1.37 kb DNA fragment containing the MEOX1 promoter region was purchased from Genecopia (Rockville, MD). The promoter DNA was amplified with primers containing Nhe1 and Xho1 sites using Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent) to generate the 0.7 kb truncated form in the pGL3-basic vector. All constructs were confirmed by sequencing (Macrogen, Rockville, MD). Primer sequences are available upon request.
To monitor luciferase activity, 293T and OVCAR3 cells were transfected with pGL3-MX constructs and incubated for 24 h, followed by treatment with PBX1-targeting drugs at the designated concentrations for 24 h. To compensate for variations in transfection efficiency, pRL-Renilla reporter plasmid (Promega) was co-transfected, and luciferase activity was determined by Dual-Glo luciferase reagent (Promega). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Recombinant Ubiquitin Mutants and Histone Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare ubiquitin-aminoethanethiol (Ub-SH), we used a previously described pTXB1-Ub-AvaDnaE-AAFN-His6 plasmid.24 (link) Ubiquitin double mutants (Ub1 – E16A, E18A; Ub2 – I44A, F45A) were generated using a Quick Change Mutagenesis kit with the Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent) and the following primers: forward Ub1 5-TTCTCAATGGTGTCACTCGGAGCCACAGCGAGAGTGATGGTCTTACCAG-3; reverse Ub1 5-CTGGTAAGACCATCACTCTCGCTGTGGCTCCGAGTGACACCATTGAGAA-3; forward Ub2 5-CATCTTCCAGCTGTTTCCCAGCAGCAGCCAACCTCTGCTGGTCAGGAGGG-3; reverse Ub2 5-CCCTCCTGACCAGCAGAGGTTGGCTGCTGCTGGGAAACAGCTGGAAGATG-3; forward UbBpa 5-CCAGCTGTTTCCCAGCCTAGATCAACCTCTGCTGG-3; reverse UbBpa 5-CCAGCAGAGGTTGATCTAGGCTGGGAAACAGCTGG-3; forward K119C 5-GTCCGTGCTGCTGCCCAAGTGTACCGAGAGTTCCAAGTCGG-3; reverse K119C 5-CCGACTTGGAACTCTCGGTACACTTGGGCAGCAGCACGGAC-3.
The correct sequence was confirmed by gene sequencing. The plasmids for wild-type Xenopus histones, H2B K120C, H2A N110C, and all DNA constructs have been described before.15 (link),25 (link),45 ,46 pEVOL-pBpF (used for UbBpa expression) was a gift from Peter Schultz (Addgene plasmid # 31190).30 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Cloning Using Polymerase Chain Reaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymerase chain reactions were performed using Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent). Primers used in this study are listed in Table S2. PCR products were purified using the Nucleospin® Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit (Macherey-Nagel; Düren, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cloning reactions were performed using an In-Fusion® HD Cloning Kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc.; Mountain View, CA) or by standard ligation with T4 ligase. Plasmids were introduced to S. aureus by electroporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Recombinant Ubiquitin Mutants and Histone Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare ubiquitin-aminoethanethiol (Ub-SH), we used a previously described pTXB1-Ub-AvaDnaE-AAFN-His6 plasmid.24 (link) Ubiquitin double mutants (Ub1 – E16A, E18A; Ub2 – I44A, F45A) were generated using a Quick Change Mutagenesis kit with the Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent) and the following primers: forward Ub1 5-TTCTCAATGGTGTCACTCGGAGCCACAGCGAGAGTGATGGTCTTACCAG-3; reverse Ub1 5-CTGGTAAGACCATCACTCTCGCTGTGGCTCCGAGTGACACCATTGAGAA-3; forward Ub2 5-CATCTTCCAGCTGTTTCCCAGCAGCAGCCAACCTCTGCTGGTCAGGAGGG-3; reverse Ub2 5-CCCTCCTGACCAGCAGAGGTTGGCTGCTGCTGGGAAACAGCTGGAAGATG-3; forward UbBpa 5-CCAGCTGTTTCCCAGCCTAGATCAACCTCTGCTGG-3; reverse UbBpa 5-CCAGCAGAGGTTGATCTAGGCTGGGAAACAGCTGG-3; forward K119C 5-GTCCGTGCTGCTGCCCAAGTGTACCGAGAGTTCCAAGTCGG-3; reverse K119C 5-CCGACTTGGAACTCTCGGTACACTTGGGCAGCAGCACGGAC-3.
The correct sequence was confirmed by gene sequencing. The plasmids for wild-type Xenopus histones, H2B K120C, H2A N110C, and all DNA constructs have been described before.15 (link),25 (link),45 ,46 pEVOL-pBpF (used for UbBpa expression) was a gift from Peter Schultz (Addgene plasmid # 31190).30 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Aberrant ChREBP Isoforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs isolated from L-Chrebp−/− livers were used to synthesize first-strand cDNAs using the PrimeScript First Strand cDNA synthesis kit from Clontech (6110A), which were used as templates for PCR amplifications. Two PCR reactions were carried out with PfuUltra II polymerase (Agilent Technologies) using 5′ primers corresponding to the 5′ end of either ChREBP-α (5′-GTGGCCATGGCGCGCGCGCTGGCGGATC-3′) or ChREBP-β (5′-GACGCCATCTGCAGATCGCGTGGAGC-3′). Both reactions used the same 3′ primer, 5′-AGGATTATAATGGTCTCCCCAG­GGTGCC-3′, corresponding to the common 3′ end of ChREBP-α and ChREBP-β. The abundance of the PCR product amplified by ChREBP-α primers was >10-fold higher than that of ChREBP-β primers. Both products were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO vector and sequenced. The results confirmed that the PCR product of ChREBP-α primers in the L-Chrebp−/− livers encoded an aberrant ChREBP-α with an internal deletion of amino acid residues 301-826. Likewise, the PCR product of ChREBP-β primers encoded an aberrant ChREBP-β with the internal deletion of the same region. Because the aberrant ChREBP-β is expressed at an extremely low level in L-Chrebp−/− liver (<3% of that of full-length ChREBP-β in control liver, see supplemental Tables S2A and S2B), only the aberrant ChREBP-α (designated as ChREBPΔ) was evaluated for activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Modification of Enterococcus faecalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotide sequences of primers are listed in Table S3. All restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs. For construction of the cCF10-inducible tig complementation vector, tig was amplified from purified OG1RF genomic DNA using Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent), digested with BamHI-HF/NheI-HF, and ligated to pCIEtm (23 (link)) treated with the same restriction enzymes. The plasmid construct was verified by Sanger sequencing (Eurofins). For generation of constitutive fluorescent protein constructs, P23 was excised from pDL278p23 (57 (link)) by digestion with EcoRI-HF/BamHI-HF and ligated to pTCV-LacSpec digested with the same restriction enzymes. A fragment encoding promoterless GFP (58 (link)) flanked by BamHI and BlpI sites was inserted to create pP23::GFP, and the BamHI-SphI fragment from pJ201::187931 was inserted to create pP23::tdTomato. The Tn insertions in strains used for submerged Aclar disc and MultiRep reactor experiments were verified by colony PCR using the oligonucleotides listed in Table S4. The Tn insertion adds ∼2.1 kb to the size of the wild-type allele.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Engineered Dabs Cloning and Mutagenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthetic DNA gene fragments for the variable light and heavy chain domains were purchased as codon-optimized G blocks (IDT). DNA fragments were joined using overlap extension PCR (Ho et al., 1989 (link)) with Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent) in the presence of 2% DMSO. PCR primers encoded the desired linker region between VH and VL and a C-terminal hexa-histidine protein purification tag (Table S1). Sequences of engineered Dabs are presented in Table S2. Complete Dab genes were inserted into the pET28a expression vector (Novagen). Restriction digests of the insert and vector were performed with NcoI-HF and XhoI (NEB) followed by gel extraction (Qiagen) and quick ligation (NEB) according to manufacturer protocols. Completed clones were transformed into XL10-Gold Ultracompetent cells (Agilent) and single colonies were picked from LB-agar plates after selection with 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Successful insertions were confirmed by PCR with Taq polymerase (NEB) and primers external to the cloning site (IDT), followed by full sequencing (Genewiz). Single amino acid mutations were introduced using site-directed mutagenesis (Bachman, 2013 (link)) and Pfu Ultra II polymerase in the presence of 2% DMSO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cloning of Ftz and Ftz-F1 Transcription Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ftz and Ftz-F1 coding regions were cloned into the pAc5.1 ⁄ V5-His C expression vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific) without any tags. To that end, RNA was purified from 0–12 hours old Drosophila embryos using the Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using MMLV-Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). The primers that were used for cloning Ftz (forward: 5’ AAGGTACCATGGCCACCACAAACAGC 3’, reverse: 5' AAGGATCCTCATCAAGACAGATGGTAGAGGTCC 3') include a KpnI restriction site in the forward primer and a BamHI restriction site in the reverse primer. The coding region of Ftz-F1 was amplified using the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP) LD15303 clone as a template. The primers that were used for cloning Ftz-F1 (Forward: 5’ CCGAATTCATGGATACCTTCAATGTACCTATGCTGGCGGAGAG 3’, Reverse: 5’ TTGGATCCTACTATCCCTTGCGCTTGGCGTGCAG 3’) include an EcoRI restriction site in the forward primer and a BamHI restriction site in the reverse primer. All PCR reactions were carried out using PfuUltra II polymerase (Agilent Technologies). PCR fragments were initially cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) before cloning into the final expression plasmids. The DNA sequence of each plasmid was verified by sequencing reactions (Hy Labs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Overlap Extension PCR for DNA Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In separate PCR steps (see Supplementary Fig. S1A), the assembly fragments (5′ untranslated region-AGT and 3′ untranslated region) were amplified with primers 5′-UTR fwd (5′-CCGCCGGTACCTCCCAAGCCTG-3′), 5′-UTR rev (5′-TGGCGAAAGGGGGATGTGC-3′), 3′ UTR fwd (5′-AGTGAGGATCCGGCTGCTAACAAAGCC-3′) and 3′ UTR rev (5′-TGCTAGCGCTATATGCGTTGATGC-3′), respectively, from the plasmid pIVEX-AGT-DHFR using Pfu Ultra II polymerase (Agilent Technologies). Identical thermo-cycling conditions were used as above apart from the annealing temperatures (60°C). After DpnI digestion and purification of the amplicons, the library was assembled by overlap extension PCR using the PCR fragments from the separate amplification steps described above using the primers LMB 2-6 (5′-ATGTGCTGCAAGGCGATTAAG-3′) and pIV-BG (5′-BG-­GCGTTGATGCAATTTCTATGC-3′). The final construct was subjected to PEG-MgCl2 precipitation, as described in Stein and Hollfelder (2009) (link) to remove any remaining primer-dimers. Samples were run on an agarose gel to confirm DNA fragments with the correct size were amplified (see Supplementary Fig. S1B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Molecular Cloning and Mutagenesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthetic DNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. PfuUltraII polymerase (Agilent Technologies) or Phusion Polymerase (New England Biolabs) were used for high fidelity PCR amplifications in the buffer supplied by the respective manufacturer. PCR products and products of restriction digests were purified either with PCR clean up kit (QIAGEN) or using preparative agarose gel electrophoresis followed by DNA isolation using the Zymoclean gel DNA recovery kit (Zymo Research). Restriction endonucleases were purchased from New England Biolabs and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ligations were performed using T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen) or Gibson Assembly (New England Biolabs). Small-scale isolation of plasmid DNA was performed by plasmid miniprep kit (QIAGEN). The cDNA sequences for all fusion constructs were confirmed by sequencing (Genewiz). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with QuikChange kit (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!