The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using chadox1 ncov 19

1

COVID-19 Vaccination in São Paulo, Brazil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The State of São Paulo (23°3′S, 46°4′W) has 645 municipalities and 46 million inhabitants, 3.23 million of whom are aged ≥70 years.24 (link) The state experienced three successive waves of covid-19, during which 2 997 282 cases (cumulative incidence rate: 6475 per 100 000 population) and 100 649 deaths (cumulative mortality: 217 per 100 000 population) have been reported as of 9 May 2021 (fig 1, supplementary figure 1).25 The state secretary of health of Sao Paulo initiated a covid-19 vaccination campaign for the general population on 17 January 2021 according to an age based prioritisation strategy (fig 1) and is administering a two dose regimen of CoronaVac with a two to four week interval between doses, and a two dose regimen of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), with a 12 week interval.26 As of 29 April 2021, 8.63 million doses (5.16 million first doses and 3.47 million second doses) of CoronaVac had been administered and 2.06 million doses (1.99 million first doses and 0.07 million second doses) of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vaccinated individuals in the cohort received a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark (approved by the European Medicines Agency) and were followed up from the date of vaccination with the first dose (with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), or Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson and Johnson)). Only estimates for individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 are presented in the main analysis. Estimates for individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or Ad26.COV2.S are presented in the supplemental materials, because these vaccines were withdrawn from the national mass vaccination programme and rarely used. The main risk window of interest was the 28 days after vaccination, which included day 0, the day of vaccination. If study participants received a second dose, they re-entered a 28 day risk window.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Breakthrough Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For uptake, our outcomes were dates of administration of available COVID-19 vaccinations as part of the primary-two-dose vaccination schedule and the subsequent 2021 booster vaccination. Vaccinations available were Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19).
For vaccine breakthrough infections, our outcomes were dates of COVID-19 infections as determined by a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test. A new infection was defined at the date of a positive test with at least 90 since the previous positive test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Vaccine Effectiveness Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analysed 515,138 app users who reported vaccination with BNT162b2 (BioNTech-Pfizer) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-Astra Zeneca) and were subsequently tested for SARS-CoV-2 (PCR or LFAT) 14–60 days after either first or second vaccination (assessed separately) after 26 May 202136 (link). Age was restricted to 20–65 years, as most individuals > 65 years were vaccinated and most individuals < 20 years unvaccinated during the time of analysis, biasing the control groups for these ages. Users who had reported SARS-CoV-2 infection previously were excluded. Unvaccinated users reporting SARS-CoV-2 test results in the same or following week as a vaccinated app user served as controls. In the event of multiple tests logged for an individual vaccinated user, either the first positive or the last negative result was selected. For each vaccine and per dose, we modelled rates of positive testing in vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals, using Poisson regressions adjusting for number of tests, age, co-morbidities, sex, healthcare worker status, obesity, and weekly incidence in the community (by controlling for the date of the test). The adjusted risk reduction was then calculated as RR = riskratioi,n − 1, where i is the vaccine type, and riskratio is the ratio of infection rates in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals, derived from our Poisson model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight patients were referred to different university hospitals with neurological or hematological symptoms after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, London, UK) between February 1st and April 6th 2021. Six patients admitted to university hospitals and two patients, who were initially admitted to local hospitals, were later transferred to university hospitals. Medical records were used to collect treatments and outcome. Diagnosis of thromboembolic complications was made when indicated by clinical or laboratory findings and/or based on computed tomography, ultrasound imaging or in case of death by autopsy.
Blood samples were collected to exclude heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Blood samples from non-vaccinated healthy blood donors (n=24, 17 females, mean age 36.1±13.7 years) and from healthy vaccinated before and after the first vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n=41, 29 females, mean age 37.3±10.9 years) served as healthy controls.
In addition, sera from 29 COVID-19 patients who had serial HIT immunoglobulin G (IgG)-enzyme immune assay (EIA) measurements during hospitalization were also included in the study (seven females, mean age 65.3±14.1 years). Clinical data from the ICU COVID-19 patients and a VITT-patient (case #7) were reported in previous studies.3 (link),4 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were from 12 patients who became symptomatic with low platelet counts, elevated D-dimer, and signs or symptoms of thrombosis within 21 days after receiving vaccination against COVID-19 from AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 or Vaxzevria, from Astra-Zeneca, London, United Kingdom). Coagulation parameters, general chemistry, and PF4/heparin immunoassays to exclude heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) were performed at four different hospitals in Germany. Anonymized leftover material from all patients was tested in hospitals with an established modified heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) assay. Subsequently, blinded samples were distributed to all participants who performed their local PF4/heparin immunoassays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccine Doses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We studied the effectiveness of the first dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) vaccine. Individuals were defined as exposed if they had received a single dose of either vaccine between Dec 8, 2020 (Pfizer) or Jan 4, 2021 (Oxford–AstraZeneca), and Feb 12, 2021, with recruitment censored between Feb 26, 2021, and the latest event date. Unvaccinated or unexposed individuals in the analyses had received neither vaccine.
For each participant, we collected data on co-morbidities at the time of admission and determined their Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI; with published estimates of 10-year survival)15 (link) and Rockwood clinical frailty score (with a score of 5–9 indicating frailty).16 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

COVID-19 Vaccine Impact on Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients with diabetes who were undergoing treatment in the Endocrinology Outpatient Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2021 and April 2022 were recruited. All the participants completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccines during the study observation period. The types of vaccines included ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd), mRNA1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNtech, hereafter referred to as BNT) and the interval between vaccine doses ranged from 1 to 3 months. All of the participants underwent regular follow-ups and were treated by stable anti-diabetes regimens without changing doses during the enrolled time, and none were pregnant. No subject had an event of predisposing risks of hyperglycemia emergence neither in severe illness or surgery, nor abnormal fasting behavior, and they also had good adherence to medications throughout the study period. Additionally, no subject was exposed to COVID-19 infection or suffered from a vaccine-related severe adverse event such as anaphylaxis, thrombocytopenia, thromboembolism, myocarditis or Guillain-Barré syndrome, etc. The Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this retrospective study (No. 202202371B0), while the reporting of this study conformed to STROBE guidelines [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

COVID-19 Vaccination in Sweden

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vaccination against COVID-19 was performed according to the Swedish national vaccination program during 2021–2022. Three different COVID-19 vaccines were used (one adenovirus vector vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, AstraZeneca) and two mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNtech and mRNA-1273, Moderna). The vaccinations were performed using either the same vaccine type or a combination of the two vaccine types according to recommendations from the Swedish authorities (16 , 17 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identifying COVID-19 Vaccination and Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We identified persons vaccinated against COVID-19 as those who had received a dose of any COVID-19 vaccine: BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech, https://www.pfizer.com), mRNA-1273 (Moderna, https://www.modernatx.com), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca, https://www.astrazeneca.com), or Ad.26.COV2.S (Janssen/J&J, https://www.janssen.com). The date of vaccination was the date of the first dose administration. We identified COVID-19 infections based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen or reverse transcription PCR test, using the test date as the date of infection; we considered the first infection per person. We defined COVID-19 hospitalizations as hospitalizations with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result between 21 days before and 3 days after the date of admission. We defined COVID-19–related deaths as deaths occurring <28 days after the date of infection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!