The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

S3000n vpsem

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in United Kingdom

The S3000N VPSEM is a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (VPSEM) manufactured by Hitachi. It is designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of samples, including those that are non-conductive or sensitive to electron beams. The S3000N VPSEM allows for observation under variable pressure conditions, which can be useful for studying samples in their natural state without the need for complex sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using s3000n vpsem

1

Fiber Orientation and Cell Alignment Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fiber alignment across acellular tubular lamellar constructs was imaged using SEM (Hitachi S3000N VPSEM, Berkshire, UK) as described previously in section in vitro Cell Orientation on Bilayer Fiber Scaffold. Similarly, fiber alignment (Rhodamine stained) and cell orientation (Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain and molecular calcein stain for live cells) across cellular tubular lamellar constructs were imaged using laser confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP5, Leica Biosystem UK Ltd, UK) as described previously in sections in vitro Cell Orientation on Bilayer Fiber Scaffold and Cell Distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Analysis of Chronically Implanted Microelectrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to evaluate the structural changes in chronically implanted microelectrode arrays, all arrays were imaged before implantation and after explantation using a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-3000N VP-SEM). The environmental mode in the VP-SEM was chosen for imaging the arrays to enable direct placement of the samples into the SEM chamber without the use of carbon or conductive coating. This is very critical especially for pristine electrodes as they will be implanted into an animal after the SEM imaging procedure. Such a method was used so as to cause no damage to the arrays from the imaging process for both pre-implant as well as explanted arrays. When the pre-implant images were taken, electrode arrays were handled with care to prevent any damage to the microwires. The post-explant images were taken on the electrode arrays extracted from the implanted tissue. The post-explant arrays were carefully placed on a holder positioned on to the SEM stage. The following parameters were used to take the pre- and post-implant images: (1) environmental secondary electron detector (ESED) mode with an acceleration potential of 12 kV, (2) working distance range was set between 18 and 40 mm, and (3) magnification was varied according to need and the minimum magnification was set at 20X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Cell Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell morphology was assessed at 1 and 7 days using SEM and confocal microscopy. For SEM (Hitachi S3000N VPSEM), samples (n = 2) were washed in PBS and fixed in 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4 °C for 2 h. As previously described, samples were dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol in distilled water (50%–100% v/v), chemically dried in hexamethyldisilazane, mounted on carbon-tabbed stubs, and gold-sputter coated. For confocal microscopy (Leica SP8), samples were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin for 30 min, washed with PBS, permeabilized for 1 h with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (Sigma) then blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 1 h. F-actin stain (Alexa-Fluor488 phalloidin 1:300, Life Technologies) was applied and incubated for a further 2 h at 37 °C. Samples were subsequently washed with PBS and placed on glass coverslips for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Deposition of Si-O-N Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A TRION ORION II PECVD/LPECVD system (Trion Technology, Clearwater, FL) was used to deposit a uniform (nonuniformity < 1%) 100 nm SiOx layer followed by 100–1000 nm deposition of a Si–O–N amorphous film. All coatings were fabricated at a substrate temperature of 400 °C, a chamber pressure of 900 mTorr, an ICP power of 30 W, and an applied excitation frequency of 13.56 MHz. Source gases included silane (SiH4) carried by argon (Ar) (15%/85%), nitrous oxide (N2O), nitrogen (N2), and ammonia (NH3). The silane flow rate was kept low at 24 standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm) to prevent undesirable gas-phase reactions. The nitrogen and ammonia flow rates were kept high at 225 and 50 sccm, respectively, to increase N–H as well as Si–H bonding within the thin films. Five different types of films were prepared by varying the N2O flow rate, as shown in Table 1. The refractive indices and the thickness of the films were measured using ellipsometry at a wavelength of 632.8 nm (Gaertner LS300). The results were confirmed through the use of a reflectometer (Ocean Optics NC-UV–vis TF Reflectometer) and a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-3000N VP SEM). Deposition rates were determined from thickness measurements and plasma-on times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-3000N VPSEM) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (JEOL JSM-6320F) were used to investigate surface morphology and elemental compositions. In addition, the nanostructures of the HA nanofibers and the 2D were observed under scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) (JEOL JEM-ARM200CF). The XRD patterns were recorded using a Bruker D8 Discover X-ray diffraction system equipped with a copper sealed X-ray tube source, producing Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å). The diffractometer was operated at 40.0 kV and 40.0 mA at a 2θ range of 5–60° with a step size of 0.02 and an exposure time of 1 s/step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scaffold Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control, osteogenic and chondrogenic ECM scaffolds were fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin, dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions and dried using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). The samples were then coated with 5nm of platinum/palladium and imaged using Hitachi S3000N VP SEM in high vacuum mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Cell Orientation in Bilayer Scaffold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell orientation was assessed at 1, 7, and 14 days using SEM and confocal microscopy. For SEM (Hitachi S3000N VPSEM, Berkshire, UK), samples (n = 2) were washed in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) and fixed in 2.5 %v/v glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 2 h. As previously described (Shamsah et al., 2019 (link)), samples were dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol in distilled water (50–100 %v/v), chemically dried in hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma-Aldrich, UK), mounted on carbon-tabbed stubs, and gold-sputter coated. In order to image the cells positioned in between the bilayer scaffold, several small cuts were made on the top layer using a scalpel, which allowed the upper surface to be carefully removed using forceps to reveal the cell layer below. This allowed representative images of the cells present on the bottom layer of the bilayer scaffold to be captured. For confocal microscopy (Leica SP8, Leica Biosystem UK Ltd, UK), samples with live AF cells were washed with PBS, stained in the dark with calcein solution (1 μl calcein solution to 2.5 ml PBS) (Fluorescence-based Molecular Probes, ThermoFisher, Waltham, USA), and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. Samples were subsequently washed with PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) and placed on glass coverslips for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!