The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

45 protocols using filtek z250

1

Enamel Blocks Characterization and Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty sectioned enamel blocks, with 2 × 2 mm2 buccal enamel surface, were obtained from ten sound extracted primary incisors. The incisors were stored in distilled water at 4 °C prior to use for no longer than one week. Each incisor was sliced longitudinally parallel to its long axis to get two enamel blocks by a cutting machine under running water. All enamel blocks were embedded in light-cured resin (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) onto an acrylic plate. The buccal surfaces were faced upwards to make sure most regions of the surface are parallel to the plate.
After embedding the enamel into the resin, the buccal surfaces of the enamel were polished using 1000- and 2000-grit SiC abrasive paper by a manually water-cooled low-speed polishing machine to obtain a flat surface without dentine exposure, and the specimen underwent ultrasonic washing in deionised water before and after polishing. Then, the twenty blocks were randomly divided into five groups (four experimental groups GA, GB, GC, GD, and one control group GE; see Table 1), i.e., four blocks in one group, to immerse into the oral liquids or deionised water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phosphoric Acid Etching and Composite Restoration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Etching by 37% phosphoric acid gel (Denfil) for 20s was done for all the bleached surfaces. Afterward, they were rinsed with water spray for 20 s followed by the application of Adper single bond (3M ESPE; dental products), and were light cured by an LED unit (Demi plus) at a light intensity of 1200 W/cm2 for 20 s. Finally, composite resin (Filtek Z 250; 3M ESPE) restoration procedure was carried out by using a plastic mold measuring 3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height and was light cured by an LED light‐curing unit for 20 s. All the specimens were stored in distilled water at room temperature for 24 h. All the procedures were done by one operator and at the same time for the five experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four types of materials were selected for testing: three commercial products, metal-based alloy (WILLIAMS, New York, NY, USA), lithium disilicate-based ceramics (IPS Empress 2, Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein), resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and one experimental biopolymer. The main composition of these materials is described in Table 1. Each commercial material type, metal alloy or ceramics, was prepared using a lost wax technique in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations to make a 1 mm thickness inlay-like specimen with 4 mm × 5 mm inner and 5 mm × 6 mm outer surfaces using a standardized silicone mold. Experimental biopolymer specimens were shaped by a single operator. Resin composite was fully filled in the standardized silicone mold and light-cured for 40 s using Elipar Trilight (3M ESPE, USA) and finally polymerized in Labolight LVIII (GC Accord, Tokyo, Japan) for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Evaluation of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Medium and Australian premium
fetal bovine serum (iCell-0500) were purchased from Cybikang. The
MTT cell proliferation detection kit was purchased from Beijing Solaibao
Technology. KB cells, Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces viscosus, and Candida albicans were purchased from Cybikang (Shanghai,
China). SD rats were purchased from Spife Biotechnology (Suzhou, China).
EO20-PO70-EO20 (Pluronic P123, Ma
= 5800) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The 3M resin of Filtek-Z250
was purchased from 3M. The MINO, CA, MCZ, 5-FU, and other chemical
compounds were purchased from Macklin. The multifunction microplate
reader (TECAN SPARK 10M) was purchased from Ruishang. The clean bench
(SW-CJ-2FD) was purchased from Sujing Antai.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fiber-Reinforced Pontic Substructure Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare this type of post, three units quartz fiber reinforced pontics substructure (RTD co, France) were used. These Pontics were cut with a disc in lengths of 5 mm and were formed with a diamond bur to conform to the canal. Following irrigation, the post space was lightly dried. Dual-cured cement (Embrace WetBond Resin Cement, pulpdent Co., USA) was placed into the canal, and the post was seated. The excess cement was removed and cured with LED for 40 s.
The tooth was etched with etching gel (Scotchbond™ Etchant, 3M ESPE, MN, USA) for 15 s and rinsed for 10 s. Then, two consecutive coats of light cured bonding agent (Adper Single Bond, 3M ESPE, MN, USA) were applied on the etched surface, uniformly dispersed by a compressed air blast for 2-5 s and cured for 10 s. Finally, the teeth were incrementally restored with composite resin Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE, USA) and each 2 mm was cured for 20 s and 4 mm crown was formed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Dental Restorative Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main chemical components of the materials investigated in this study are summarised in Table 1. Renewal MI (Davis, Schottlander and Davis Dental Company, Letch-worth, UK) was supplied in compules. The conventional composite Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) employed with Scotchbond Universal etchant gel (37% phosphoric acid, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and Universal Scotchbond adhesive. The GIC used was Fuji IX GP (GC America, Alsip, IL, USA). The RMGICs investigated were Fuji II LC (GC America, Alsip, IL, USA) and Activa Kids (Pulpdent, Watertown, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparison of Composite Resin Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One silorane-based (Filtek P90, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and two methacrylate-based (Filtek Z250 and Z350, 3M ESPE) composite resins were used. Table 1 lists their compositions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dental Root Block Restorations with Resin Composite and GIC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prophylaxis was performed after the cavity preparations in all the dental root blocks using a pumice stone paste (SS White) and distilled and deionized water. The cavities were washed with a water and air spray and air dried.
Preparations in groups 1 and 3 were restored with a resin composite (Filtek Z 250, 3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) using 37% phosphoric acid etching and Single Bond 2 adhesive (3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) before insertion of the resin composite. The preparations in groups 2 and 4 were restored using conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Ketac Fil Plus, 3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN) with the aid of a Centrix syringe to avoid the inclusion of bubbles within the restorative material. Subsequently, the GIC was covered with a polyester strip, and a glass slide and weight (500 g) were placed on top for 7 min to standardize the restorations.
The materials were manipulated, and the cavities were restored in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The dental blocks were stored for 24 h at 37°C in a 100% humid environment at the conclusion of the restorative procedure, and the blocks were polished using a sequence of aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex, 3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Resin Sealant Evaluation on Composite Substrate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, A2 shade) was used as the substrate. Two unfilled (PS, PermaSeal, Ultradent Products Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA; OG, OptiGuard, Kerr Corp., Orange, CA, USA) and one microfilled (FP, Fortify Plus, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) sealants were investigated. Their codes, manufactures, lot numbers, main compositions, and application methods are summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Bulk-Fill Resin Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five materials were tested (Table 1): two high-viscosity bulk-fill materials: Tetric PowerFill and Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (3M, St. Paul, USA); and two low-viscosity bulk-fill materials: Tetric PowerFlow SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable, and one conventional composite: Filtek Z250 (3M).
Dimensions of composite specimens (n = 6) for water sorption and solubility were 9 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height. Polymerization was carried out using the fourth-generation light-emitting diode curing unit (Bluephase PowerCure, Ivoclar Vivadent) with one of two modes of polymerization (Figure 1):
Light intensity was measured three times with a built-in radiometer of the curing unit (Bluephase PowerCure, Ivoclar Vivadent) before specimen production to calculate the average intensity value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!