The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge discovery 750

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The GE Discovery 750 is a medical imaging system designed for diagnostic applications. It utilizes advanced imaging technologies to capture high-quality images of the body's internal structures. The system's core function is to provide healthcare professionals with the necessary imaging data to support clinical decision-making.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using ge discovery 750

1

Acquisition of Trigeminal Nerve MRI Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain MR neurograms, we utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, specifically the uMR 790 3.0 T, GE Discovery 750 3.0 T, Magnetom Aera 1.5 T, and Magnetom Skyra 3.0 T, for data acquisition. The scanning sequences for capturing images of the trigeminal nerve are detailed in Table 1. The images of 187 subjects used in this study were sourced from these four scanners: 58 from the uMR 790 3.0 T, 71 from the GE Discovery 750 3.0 T, 32 from the Magnetom Aera 1.5 T, and 26 from the Magnetom Skyra 3.0 T.
To ensure an even distribution of scanning protocols in both the training and testing datasets, we randomly divided the data from each scanner according to an 80:20 ratio. In the final dataset, the data quantities for the four scanning protocols were as follows: 47, 58, 26, and 21 in the training set (n = 152) and 11,13,6, and 5 in the testing set (n = 35).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gamma Knife MRI Treatment Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were treated on an Elekta Gamma Knife Perfexion (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). On the day of treatment, patients were imaged on a GE Discovery 750 or 750W 3T MRI system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) for treatment planning. Imaging was performed with a Leksell Coordinate G Frame attached to the patient's skull. Treatment planning imaging consisted of an axial 3-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo (FA = 12, TR = 6.65 ms, TE = 1.99 ms, N = 1) with a 0.9375 mm in-plane resolution and contiguous 1 mm slice thickness acquired after intravenous injection of MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rhesus PET and MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PET imaging was performed according to the previous reports [26 (link),28 (link)]. T1-weighted MR anatomical images were acquired on a 3.0 T scanner (GE Discovery 750, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The rhesus was anesthetized with ketamine (10 mg/kg; intramuscular injection). A circular 32-channel array head coil was placed on top of the monkey’s head. The whole-brain images were acquired with a 3D Bravo T1 sequence.
The male rhesus (weight range 9.48–10.96 kg) underwent PET (GE Discovery Elite 690, Chicago, IL, USA). The rhesus was anesthetized with ketamine (10 mg/kg; Intramuscular Injection), and then 2% isoflurane and 98% oxygen were used. A solution of [18F]Favipiravir (3.9–5.6 mCi) was injected, followed by a dynamic PET scan of the head or lung for 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment via MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI examinations were performed on a 3 Tesla scanner (GE Discovery 750, General Electric Healthcare, Wakeshaw WI) using a previously described advanced magnitude-based confounder-corrected chemical-shift-encoded acquisition and reconstruction technique to estimate proton density fat fraction (PDFF).17 (link),18 (link),19 (link) T1 weighting was minimized by using a gradient-recalled-echo sequence with a low (10°) flip angle relative to a repetition time (TR) of ≥ 150 ms. Six gradient-recalled echoes were collected at successive nominally out-of-phase and in-phase echo times to allow correction for T2* signal decay.20 (link),21 (link) Computer-generated parametric PDFF maps were calculated using least-squares fitting analysis based on a six-fat-peak spectral model to correct for inter-peak spectral interference.22 (link) For each PDFF parametric map, a 1-cm radius circular region of interest was manually placed in each of the 9 Couinaud liver segments, and a composite mean PDFF value was calculated.8
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MRgFUS for Targeted Thalamic Ablation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All VIM-MRgFUS procedures were performed by the same neurosurgeon. The MRgFUS equipment was performed in a 3.0 T MRI suit (GE Discovery 750, GE Healthcare) using the 650-kHz ExAblate Neuro focused ultrasound system (InSightec, Haifa, Israel) with a hemispheric helmet and 1,024-element phased-array transducer. The ablative side was determined based on the severity of limb symptoms and the patient’s personal willingness. The target was the VIM nucleus from triplanar T2-weighted images. The initial target ablation was performed using low-power sonication. Then, the energy for the final target ablation reached approximately 55–60 ℃ to ablative the target tissue, and the tremor in patients was well inhibited at this time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multi-Modal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 3T on a GE Discovery 750 (General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with 32-channel head coil. The protocol included T1-weighted axial fast-spoiled gradient echo (flip angle = 8°, matrix 256 × 256 × 156, voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm, TE = 3.17 ms, TI = 900 ms, TR = 8200 ms, FOV = 256 mm, number of excitations = 1), T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR; flip angle = 111°, TE = 120 ms, TR = 8000 ms, TI = 2250 ms, matrix 512 × 512 × 46, voxel size 0.46 × 0.46 × 3 mm, FOV = 235.5 mm), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI; 4 b = 0 volumes and 32 diffusion-weighted volumes, matrix 128 × 128 × 66, voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm), and resting-state fMRI (flip angle = 80°, TE = 36 ms, TR = 2200 ms, matrix 64 × 64 × 37, voxel size 3.75 × 3.75 × 3.6 mm, 191 volumes, ∼7 min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MRI Endometrial Cancer Staging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI examination was performed on a 3T scanner (GE Discovery 750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) using a dedicated MRI endometrial cancer staging protocol, which including sagittal, axial and coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo, axial T1-weighted fast spin-echo, axial diffusion-weighted imaging echo planar imaging and sagittal dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Diagnostic Accuracy of IP-SCC Using MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The performances of the prediction models were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also calculated for further evaluation. The calibration curves were applied to modify and reduce the bias of the models. Furthermore, the performance of the constructed models in this study were evaluated by a 5-fold cross-validation setup.
For comparison, a senior and junior head and neck radiologist (Y.Y. and JH.T.) were invited to independently diagnose IP-SCC via MR images. Both of the radiologists were blinded to the histopathology during the diagnosis process.
All of the images were scanned by three MR scanners (Philips Ingenia; GE Signa HDxt; GE Discovery 750). Stratified analysis was used to check whether the models were affected by different MR scanners.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

3T MRI and 3D DSA Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MRI examinations were performed with a 3.0 T MRI scanner (GE Discovery 750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an 8‑channel head coil. All patients received brain MRI examination including DWI, and FSE-Cube. The FSE-Cube sequence was obtained in a coronal plane with the following parameters: repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) 800/16 ms; slice thickness, 0.6 mm; slice gap, 0.3 mm; slice number, 256; image matrix 480 × 320; field of view (FOV) 23.0 cm × 18.4 cm; voxel size = 0.48 mm × 0.57 mm × 0.6 mm and scan duration, 6 min 32 s.
All patients underwent 3D DSA examination (Siemens Artist Zeego System, Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany) while under local anesthesia. The tip of the catheter was positioned in the common carotid artery. Standard two-dimensional (2D) DSA was initially performed; 3D rotational images were then obtained from a series of subtracted images acquired with a rotation of a vascular C‑arm [19 (link)] and contrast injection (3 ml/s × 6 s, iopamidol 300 mg/ml) with the following parameters: angle 200º, angulation step 1.5º/f, and FOV 42 cm × 42 cm. The rotational angiographic data were reconstructed using dual volume model, then the mask volume and subtraction volume were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T whole-body MRI system (GE Discovery 750; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) with a 32-channel head coil. MRI protocols included 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography, 2D high-resolution black-blood T2-weighted fast-spin-echo sequences, and pre- and post-contrast 3D high-resolution black-blood T1-weighted fast-spin-echo sequences, as well as conventional brain MRI. Enhanced T1WI was performed by obtaining repeated scans within 10 min after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine injection (Beilu Pharmaceutical, Beijing, China) (0.1 mmol/kg, 2.0 mL/s). Detailed scan parameters are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 Summery of imaging parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!