The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Altis triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer is a high-performance analytical instrument designed for sensitive and accurate measurement of targeted compounds. It utilizes a triple-quadrupole configuration to perform multiple stages of mass analysis and fragmentation, enabling precise quantification and identification of analytes in complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

1

Lipid Profiling by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometric analysis of lipids was performed with an Altis triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) or a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) equipped with an automated nanospray device (Triversa Nanomate, Advion Biosciences, Ithaca, NY) and operated with Xcalibur software as previously described (Han et al., 2008 (link)). Identification and quantification of all reported lipid molecular species were performed using an in-house automated software program (Wang et al., 2017 (link)). All adipose tissue or serum lipid levels were normalized to sample DNA content or serum volume, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LCMS-based Quantitation of Chloroquine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drug concentrations were determined using an LCMS system consisting of a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA) Vanquish HPLC System interfaced to a Thermo Scientific Altis Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer with an electrospray source. All drugs were separated using gradient elution methodology on a Biphenyl phase (Restek, 2.1 mmid, 100 mm length, 1.8 µm particle diameter) with binary mobile phase. Samples (50 µL) were diluted with methanol (200 µl) and centrifuged to precipitate proteins. The supernatant was diluted with a solution similar to the initial mobile phase that contained the internal standard, cisapride. The MS was set to positive ion mode and Selective Reactive Monitoring (SRM) with argon used for collision induced dissociation. The initial mobile phase was 20% methanol. Immediately following injection, the organic phase concentration was increased linearly to reach 95% methanol at 8 min. Then the mobile phase was returned to the initial condition (20% methanol) and held for 2 min to condition the column for the next injection. Both aqueous and organic phases contained 0.1% formic acid. SRM (parent/daughter) transitions used were m/z 320.19 → 247.125 for chloroquine and 466.12 → 184.042 for cisapride. Quantitation was based on a 7-point calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serum SCFA Analysis in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum was obtained from mice fed ad libitum or on DR for 4 wk. To measure short-chain fatty acids, LC-MS analysis was performed in duplicate on a Thermo Vanquish UPLC-Thermo Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Stable Isotope Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade solvents and LC–MS modifiers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Detection and quantification were achieved by ultra-performance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) utilizing a Thermo Scientific Vanquish UPLC with a Thermo Scientific Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) in positive ion mode (3500 V). 50 µl of sample was mixed with 200 µl of acetonitrile (ACN), vortexed for 5 min and then centrifuged at 4 °C, 17,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred to an LC–MS vial for analysis. Injection volume was 1 µl. A Waters Cortecs T3 column, 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.6 µm column was maintained at 35 °C. Solvent A: H2O with 0.1% formic acid (FA) and Solvent B: ACN with 0.1% FA. The flow rate was 250 µl/min, the gradient was 25% B at 0 min for 0.25 min, increasing to 65% B at 5 min, further increasing to 90% B at 5.5 min, remained 90% B until 7.5 min, then decreased to 25% B at 8 min. The total running time was 10 min. Samples were analyzed in triplicates. Quantitation of 14NAT and 15NAT were based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions m/z, 170.062 → 115.042 and 171.062 → 115.042, respectively. The result was based on the percentage ratio of 15NAT/(14NAT + 15NAT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipid Profiling by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometric analysis of lipids was performed with an Altis triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) or a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) equipped with an automated nanospray device (Triversa Nanomate, Advion Biosciences, Ithaca, NY) and operated with Xcalibur software as previously described (Han et al., 2008 (link)). Identification and quantification of all reported lipid molecular species were performed using an in-house automated software program (Wang et al., 2017 (link)). All adipose tissue or serum lipid levels were normalized to sample DNA content or serum volume, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometric Lipid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometric analysis of lipids was performed with an Altis triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) or a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) equipped with an automated nanospray device (Triversa Nanomate, Advion Biosciences, Ithaca, NY) and operated with the Xcalibur software as previously described (Han, Yang, & Gross, 2008 (link); K. Yang, Cheng, Gross, & Han, 2009 (link)). Identification and quantification of all reported lipid molecular species were performed using an in-house automated software program (Wang et al., 2017 (link); K. Yang et al., 2009 (link)). All lipid levels were normalized to sample protein content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Higenamine Quantification in Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was conducted using a Vanquish LC system, coupled with an Altis triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo, Hemel Hempstead, UK). The mobile phases and column were as detailed above for HRAM analysis, however a different solvent gradient programme was employed: Chromatographic conditions were held with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min at 98% A for the first 0.5 min, increased to 25% B over the next 3.5 min and then increased to 95% B and the conditions held until 5 min, after which time the system was returned to starting conditions and re‐equilibrated.
The mass spectrometer was operated in positive electrospray ionisation mode with a vaporiser temperature of 400°C and ion transfer tube temperature of 350°C. The spray voltage was 3500 V. Collision energies were set at 26 eV for the fragmentation of higenamine and the deuterated IS, for the SRM transitions m/z 272 > 107 and 276 > 108 for higenamine and the IS, respectively. Calibration lines (analyte/IS peak area vs analyte concentration) were constructed using Thermo XCalibur version 4.0.27.21 QuanBrowser using a weighted linear regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Proteomics Workflow for SRM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on a Proxeon EasyLC coupled to a Thermo Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Peptides were separated by reverse phase liquid chromatography using pulled tip columns created from 75 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary (New Objectives, Woburn, MA) in-house using a laser pulling device and packed with 3 μm ReproSil-Pur C18 beads (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany) to 30 cm. Trap columns were created from 150 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary fritted with Kasil on one end and packed with the same C18 beads to 3 cm. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water (v/v), and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile (v/v). For each injection, approximately 1 μg total protein was loaded and eluted using a 90 min gradient from 5 to 40% B in 25 min, 40 to 60% B in 5 min, followed by a 15 min wash and then 15 min equilibration back to initial conditions. Total analytical run time was 45 min. Thermo RAW files were imported into Skyline11 (link) (Skyline-daily version 4.1.1.18151) for processing and Total Area Fragment results were exported using a Custom Report.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!