The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using pe anti mouse ter 119

1

Isolation and Identification of Murine Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained in the dark on ice for 15 min with flow cytometry antibodies. Cells were then washed once with 1× PBS and resuspended in 1× PBS for sorting as described previously11 (link)–13 (link),73 (link). Antibodies used in this study were: PE anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (BD Biosciences, #553089, 1:100), PE anti-mouse TER-119 (Biolegend, #116207, 1:100), PE anti-O4 (R&D Systems, #FAB1326P, 1:100), PE anti-CD105 (eBioscience, #12–1051-82, 1:100), PE anti-CD140a (eBioscience, #12–1401-81, 1:100), PE anti-Ly-6G (Biolegend, #127608, 1:100), PerCP anti-Ly-6C (Biolegend, #128028, 1:100), APC anti-CD45 (eBioscience, #17–0451-83, 1:100), APC-Cy7 anti-CD11c (BD Biosciences, #561241, 1:100), and FITC anti-CD11b (eBioscience, #11–0112-85, 1:100). All cells were gated on the following parameters: CD105negCD140anegO4negTer119negLy-6GnegCD45Rneg. Astrocytes were subsequently gated on: CD11bnegCD45negLy-6CnegCD11cneg. Microglia were subsequently gated on: CD11bhighCD45lowLy-6Clow. Pro-inflammatory monocytes were subsequently gated on: CD11bhighCD45highLy-6Chigh. Compensation was performed on single-stained samples of cells and an unstained control. Cells were sorted on a FACS Aria IIu (BD Biosciences). For sorting of TdTomato+ astrocytes, cells were sorted according to TdTomato fluorescence judged against a wild-type control animal using a yellow-green laser on a FACS Aria IIu.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bone Marrow Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow cells obtained from tibias and femurs were isolated and stained using the following fluorescent conjugated antibodies: PE anti-mouse CD3, PE anti-mouse CD11b, PE anti-mouse CD45R/B220, PE anti-mouse CD45, PE anti-mouse Ter119 (mouse specific, no cross reactivity with human cells); appropriate isotype control antibodies were also used (all antibodies purchased from BioLegend). Cell fluorescence was measured immediately after staining (Becton Dickinson, FACS Calibur) and data were analyzed using the CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). A maximum of 150,000 events were counted and final data were obtained within the lymphocyte gate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were washed once with FACS washing buffer (2% FBS and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS). Cells were then incubated with fluorescence-conjugated antibodies against cell surface molecules for 30 min on ice. PERCP-CY5.5 antimouse CD45 (Cat# 103131, clone 30-F11), PE antimouse Ter119 (Cat# 116207, clone TER-119), Brilliant Violet 510 antimouse CD11b (Cat#101263, clone M1/70), Brilliant Violet 421 antimouse CD11c (Cat#117330, clone N418), APC-Cyanine7 antimouse Ly6G (Cat# 108424, clone RB6-8C5), and Brilliant Violet 605 antimouse Ly6C (Cat# 108440, clone HK1.4) were purchased from BioLegend. To determine cell viability, a LIVE/DEAD Fixable Green Dead Cell Stain Kit (Cat# L34970, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing with FACS buffer, the cells were fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS and preserved at 4 °C. Flow cytometry was performed using a Becton Dickinson FACS Fortessa machine (East Rutherford, NJ, United States) and the data were analyzed using the FlowJo version 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained in the dark on ice for 15 minutes with flow cytometry antibodies. Cells were then washed once with 1X PBS and resuspended in 1X PBS for sorting as described previously (Mayo et al., 2014 ; Rothhammer et al., 2016 ). Antibodies used in this study were: PE anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (#553089, BD Biosciences, 1:100), PE anti-mouse TER-119 (#116207, Biolegend, 1:100), PE anti-O4 (#FAB1326P, R&D Systems, 1:100), PE anti-CD105 (#12–1051-82, eBioscience, 1:100), PE anti-CD140a (#12–1401-81, eBioscience, 1:100), PE anti-Ly-6G (#127608, Biolegend, 1:100), PerCP anti-Ly-6C (#128028, Biolegend, 1:100), APC anti-CD45 (#17–0451-83, eBioscience, 1:100), APC-Cy7 anti-CD11c (#561241, BD Biosciences, 1:100), and PE-Cy7 or FITC anti-CD11b (#25–0112-82, #11–0112-85, eBioscience, 1:100). All cells were gated on the following parameters: CD105negCD140anegO4negTer119negLy-6GnegCD45Rneg. Astrocytes were subsequently gated on: CD11bnegCD45negLy-6CnegCD11cneg. Microglia were subsequently gated on: CD11bhighCD45lowLy-6Clow. Pro-inflammatory monocytes were subsequently gated on: CD11bhighCD45highLy-6Chigh. Compensation was performed on single-stained samples of cells and an unstained control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!