The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using s 2400

1

Microstructural Characterization of Freeze-Dried APIs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microstructures of the sample were observed to confirm structural characteristics under gelatin concentrations using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (S-2400, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The freeze-dried APIs of cross-sections were fixed on carbon tape. The fixed samples were coated with gold, and images were captured at 5 kV with 200× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural and Chemical Analysis of Supercapacitor Wire

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of samples was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (model Hitachi S2400). Samples were placed in the sample holder using a carbon tape and then coated with a thin layer of gold-palladium alloy. Confocal Raman spectrophotometer (Witec Alpha 300 RAS) using a laser of 532 nm and 1.6 mW of power was used to demonstrate the chemical composition of the supercapacitor wire.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of MCF Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was performed using the modified method of Zavarezel et al. (2021) (link) to determine the microstructure and particle size of MCF. A sputter coater (Hitachi E 102 MC1000 Ion Sputter) having a 20 nm thick gold layer with a conductive double-sided carbon adhesive tape was used to cover the MCF powder. Surface and cross-sectional visualisation of MCF starch granules was carried out by placing the film on an aluminum sheet recorded with double-sided tape and then covered with a 20 nm–30 nm thick gold layer. An accelerating voltage of 20.0 kV was used to analyse all MCF starch granule samples. SEM Hitachi S 2400 recorded and analysed MCF starch granules. Images of MCF starch granules were visualised up to 1.000 × sizes 1280 × 960 pixels using Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Root Canal Irrigants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root canals of access cavities in 20 extracted premolars were prepared by the crown-down technique with rotary nickel-titanium files (K3®; SybronEndo Corporation, Orange, USA) and irrigated with 5 wt% sodium hypochlorite by a 25-gauge blunt-end needle of syringe. The anatomic diameter was determined by introducing successively larger K-files to the working length until resistance was felt upon removal of the file. To investigate the smear layer removal effect of the final irrigation, 20 canals were randomly divided into five groups (N=4) and irrigated with 15 wt% EDTA, 10 wt% citric acids, 0.04 wt% of FSC and ASP solutions, and control (normal saline) for 1 min. All irrigated canals received a final rinse with distilled water for 5 min to halt any chemical activity. The crowns were removed at the cementum–enamel junction. The roots were then split longitudinally with a chisel and a hammer. Finally, specimens were gold-coated and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S2400, Tokyo, Japan) under an accelerating voltage of 15–20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of 3D Printed Scaffold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were sputter-coated with an Ion Sputter (E−1010, Hitachi, Japan), and the crystal morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (S2400, Hitachi, Japan) at 15 kV at different magnification. For the 3D printed scaffold, the spacing (pore size) between the scaffold printing wires was obtained by measuring the average value of 20 pore diameters in the SEM image by ImageJ software. EDX energy spectrum obtained by SEM EDX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluation of Surgical Instrument Integrity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Instruments from each system (n = 6) were randomly selected and examined at ×3.4 and ×13.6 magnifications under stereomicroscopy (Opmi Pico, Carl Zeiss Surgical, Jena, Germany) to evaluate (a) the number of active blades (in units), (b) the helical angle by calculating the average angle of the 6 most coronal spirals assessed in triplicate, and (c) the distance (in mm) from the 2 measuring lines (20 and 22 mm) to the instruments’ tip using a digital caliper with a 0.01 mm resolution (Mitutoyo, Aurora, IL, USA). Measurements were made in triplicate and averaged with values higher than 0.1 mm from the reference line position considered significant and (d) presence of major defects or deformations (missed, twisted, or distorted blades). These same instruments were then evaluated under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (S-2400, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at ×100 and ×500 magnification regarding the symmetry of the spirals (symmetrical or asymmetrical), the geometry of the tip (active or non-active), the cross-sectional shape, and the presence of surface marks, deformations, or defects produced by the machining process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metallurgical Characterization of Dental Instruments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metallurgical characteristics of the instruments and their semi-quantitative elemental constitution were evaluated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (DSC 204 F1 Phoenix; Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Bruker Quantax, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) with scanning-electron microscopy (S-2400, Hitachi) (EDS/SEM), respectively. Fragments acquired from the coronal active portion of 2 instruments (3 to 5 mm in length) from each system, weighing 7 to 10 mg, were evaluated in the DSC test according to the American Society for Testing and Materials guidelines [9 ]. For 2 min, each sample was exposed to a chemical bath composed of a mixture of 45% nitric acid, 30% distilled water, and 25% hydrofluoric and then mounted in an aluminum pan, with an empty pan serving as control. In each group, DSC test was performed twice to confirm the results. Thermal cycles were performed from 150 °C to −150 °C (cooling/heating rate: 10 K/min), under a gaseous nitrogen (N2) atmosphere, and transformation temperature charts created with dedicated software (Netzsch Proteus Thermal Analysis; Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). EDS/SEM analysis was performed on the surface (400 µm2) of 3 instruments of each type at a 25 mm distance (20 kV and 3.1 A) using software with ZAF correction (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was performed using a Hitachi model S2400 with an electron beam intensity of 20 kV and the respective micrographs from surface and cross-section of the films were acquired using Esprit 1.9 software. All tested samples were coated with a thin Pd/Au layer to induce charge under the electron beam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Gecko Skin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present study made use of two specimens of the Mediterranean gecko Tarentola mauritanica (Linnaeus, 1758) accidentally dead and preserved in formalin for some hours followed by a longer storage in 70% of ethanol. The ventral skin from fingers and toes was here observed.
After about 5 days of drying at room temperature under covering, in order to avoid dust deposition, samples of 2 by 3 mm were attached on alluminium stubs of 5 mm in diameter, previously coated with double-sticky tape for Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) observations. The samples were double coated with gold using a metalizer device (BIO-RAD SEM Coating System, SC502), and observed at various magnifications under a SEM Hitachi S-2400 operating at 15 Kv. Other observations at higher magnification were done on a "Thermofisher Quattro S" SEM powered by a field emission gun (FEG) for electron source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Cross-linked PEDOT:PSS Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Film thickness was measured with a Bruker's Dektak® 3.21 Profilometer: a cut in the film was made with a scalpel until reaching the glass substrate and the height of the cut (film thickness) was measured upon surface scanning perpendicularly to the cut. The morphology of the cross-linked PEDOT:PSS films was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM Hitachi S-2400, Hitachi) at 15 kV, after coating with a thin layer of gold/palladium. Elemental analysis was carried using an EDS Bruker SDD light elements detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!