The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using m mulv rt

1

Quantitative PCR Analysis of XRCC1 Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LCLs were treated with either 100 μg/ml Cycloheximide (Sigma) or vehicle alone for 4 h and total RNA extracted with RNAeasy Kit (Qiagen) essentially as described by the manufacturer but with an additional 15 min DNAse I (Promega) digest of the samples on the column. 1 μg total RNA was annealed to oligodT(15) primer and reverse transcribed using M-MuLV RT (NEB) for 2 h at 42°C. After RNAse A digest, the cDNA was purified using PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and 1/40 of the eluate used per reaction. Three replicate qPCR reactions using ABsolute qPCR SYBR Low ROX (Thermo) were performed per experiment in a MX3005P (Agilent) thermocycler and analysed using MxPro software (Agilent). The fold change was calculated from ΔCt values relative to actin and ΔΔCt values relative to WT untreated for three independent experiments. Primers were:
XRCC1 exon10 forward: CAACACCCCCAAGTACAGC
XRCC1 exon 10 reverse: AGTCCAGCACCCACTCCTTAC
XRCC1 exon11 forward: TCCAGCAGTGAGGAGGATG
XRCC1 intron11 reverse: AGGCAAGAGTGGGAAGTTTG
XRCC1 exon 12 reverse: AGTGGGCTTGGTTTTGGTC
Actin forward: CTCGTCATACTCCTGCTTGC
Actin reverse: GAAGTGTGACGTGGACATCC
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of XRCC1 Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LCLs were treated with either 100 μg/ml Cycloheximide (Sigma) or vehicle alone for 4 h and total RNA extracted with RNAeasy Kit (Qiagen) essentially as described by the manufacturer but with an additional 15 min DNAse I (Promega) digest of the samples on the column. 1 μg total RNA was annealed to oligodT(15) primer and reverse transcribed using M-MuLV RT (NEB) for 2 h at 42°C. After RNAse A digest, the cDNA was purified using PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and 1/40 of the eluate used per reaction. Three replicate qPCR reactions using ABsolute qPCR SYBR Low ROX (Thermo) were performed per experiment in a MX3005P (Agilent) thermocycler and analysed using MxPro software (Agilent). The fold change was calculated from ΔCt values relative to actin and ΔΔCt values relative to WT untreated for three independent experiments. Primers were:
XRCC1 exon10 forward: CAACACCCCCAAGTACAGC
XRCC1 exon 10 reverse: AGTCCAGCACCCACTCCTTAC
XRCC1 exon11 forward: TCCAGCAGTGAGGAGGATG
XRCC1 intron11 reverse: AGGCAAGAGTGGGAAGTTTG
XRCC1 exon 12 reverse: AGTGGGCTTGGTTTTGGTC
Actin forward: CTCGTCATACTCCTGCTTGC
Actin reverse: GAAGTGTGACGTGGACATCC
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Evaluation of RT-PCR Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 5

Example 5 demonstrated the enhanced efficiency of V3 in RT-PCR. V3 RT, ProtoScript II and MMuLV RT in RT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed using primer pairs ACTB (ACTB-F:CTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGACA (SEQ ID NO:13); ACTB-RR, AAGGGACTTCCTGTAACAACGCA (SEQ ID NO:14)) targeting the Actin B gene or B2M (B2M-F: TGCTGTCTCCATGTTTGATGTATCT (SEQ ID NO:15); B2M-R: TCTCTGCTCCCCACCTCTAAGT (SEQ ID NO:16) targeting the B2M gene with 10 ng of Jurkat cell total RNA. The qRT-PCR performed in 25 μl of 1× ThermoPol® buffer (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass.) supplement with MgSO4 to a final of 3 mM Mg++, 400 uM each dNTP, 0.625 U Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass.), 400 nM each of the forward and reverse primer, 2 μM SYTO 9. For RT, it is either 50 ng of V3 RT, or 100 U ProtoScript II RT (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass.) or 100 U MMuLV RT (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass.). The reaction mix was incubated at 54° C. for 5 minutes and then temperature cycled at 95° C. for 10 seconds, 58° C. for 15 seconds, and 68° C. for 30 seconds. The DNA amplification signal was acquired on a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermal cycler. As shown in FIG. 5A-B, V3 RT generated a robust qRT-PCR signal much more rapidly than did the other enzymes.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RT-qPCR Transcript Quantification and Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All RNA analyzed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was treated with RQ1 DNase (Promega) before the reverse transcription (RT) reaction. RT reactions were performed using SuperScript™ II RT (Invitrogen) or M-MuLV-RT (New England Biolabs) and random hexamers (Sigma) or dT20 (fractionation experiments) as per the manufacturer's protocol. cDNAs were then treated with RNase A and RNase H for 30 min at 37°C and purified with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (PCA). cDNAs were resuspended in 20 μl H2O and diluted in an assay-dependent manner. Primer sequences and efficiencies are described in Supplementary Table S3. Relative quantities (RQ) were determined based on amplification efficiency and Ct value. To determine the relative expression of candidate transcripts after fractionation, single knockdown or knockdown over time, RQ values were normalized to RQ values of 7SK RNA.
To assess relative stability of candidate transcripts, cells transfected with REF or Control siRNAs were treated with 1 ug/ml Actinomycin D to inhibit transcription. Cells were harvested at various time points from 0 to 4 h by addition of Tri-Reagent. RNA was extracted and analyzed by RT-qPCR to determine RNA abundance after transcription shut-off. Transcription shut-off RT-qPCR was performed using a one-step reaction with MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of HIV-1 Viral mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were transfected with 0.1 μg of pGCH provirus along with 0.2 μg of either Tat-FLAG or Nullbasic-FLAG plasmids or both. Total RNA was extracted 24 h post-transfection using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and further isolated using the PolyAtract mRNA isolation system (Promega). The purified total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using random hexamer primers and M-MuLV RT (New England BioLabs) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Viral cDNAs were quantified by quantitative PCR using Platinum SYBR Green Supermix (Invitrogen) on the Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen). The primers used to detect total and unspliced viral mRNA has been described previously [58 (link)]. Reverse-transcribed GAPDH cDNA was used to normalize extraction efficiency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RT-qPCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed after RNA isolation from cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen). RNA samples were DNaseI (Qiagen, 79254) treated in Figures 2, 3 and 6. cDNA was prepared in Figures 4 and 5 using Oligo(dT) and dNTPs with M-Mulv RT (NEB#M0253) and in Figures 2, 3 and 6Supplementary Figures S4 and 5 using MiScript II Reverse Transcriptase system (Qiagen). GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega A6002) was used for qPCR with primers specific to human or mouse as listed in the Supplementary Table S3. Relative quantities were calculated using the ΔΔCt method, normalized to the geometric mean of β-actin and GAPDH unless otherwise indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Single-cell RNA-seq protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences of all used oligonucleotides are demonstrated in Supplementary Table S1. These oligonucleotides were ordered from TaKaRa company (Dalian, China). Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., LTD. The M-MuLV RT (product number: M0253), the Cas9 Nuclease, Streptococcus pyogenes (product# M0646) were purchased from New England Biolabs, Inc. (USA). Transcript Aid T7 High Yield Transcription kit (product# K0441) and Glycogen (product# R0561) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Total RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For total RNA isolation, infection was monitored for CPE and cells were harvested at day 4 after infection. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS, lysed in TriZol, and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two sets of primers (targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and Nucleocapsid (N) genes) were used for gene-specific reverse transcription and amplification, except for SARS-CoV-2, which was analyzed using RdRp only (Supplementary Table 1 online). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized with M-MuLV RT (NEB) using 500 ng of total RNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR amplification was carried out using SYBR Green technology with the iTaq Universal SYBR Green PCR master mix according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genome copies were calculated using a standard curve, and fold differences in gene expression were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method.14
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Engineered Poliovirus RNA Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were transfected by electroporation with 5 µg viral RNA transcript, added to HeLa cell monolayers and incubated at 37 °C. Upon cytopathic effect (CPE), viruses were harvested by three repeated freeze-thaw cycles, cell debris removed by centrifugation. Viral RNA was isolated with QiaAmp viral RNA purification kit (Qiagen), as recommended by the manufacturer. The 3Dpol cDNA was prepared from purified viral RNA by reverse transcription with MMuLV-RT (New England Biolabs) with Random Hexamer Primers (manufacturer). The resulting DNA product was then PCR amplified using SuperTaq DNA polymerase (Ambion; Naugtuck, CT, USA) and oligonucleotides PV-3D-BglII-for and PV-3D-EcoRI-ApaI-polyA-rev as primers. The presence of all four mutations was determined by sequencing of the nucleic acid obtained in second PCR step with oligonucleotides PV-3D-seq100-for (5′-GAA GGG GTG AAG GAA CCA G-3′) and PV-3D-seq500-for (5’-AGG TTG AGC AGG GGA AA-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Apoptosis Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BC cells were trypsinised and gathered on ice, both with and without treatment. RNeasy kit was used to isolate the total RNA (Qiagen; Germantown, MD). cDNA was used to produce a random primer mixture and M-MuLV RT (New England Biolab, Ipswich, MA). Using a SYBR Green master-mix, quantitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) was carried out (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The absolute fold change for GAPDH was estimated. The sequence of primers for Bax was F: 5 ′‐CCCGAGAGGGTCTTATTCCGAG‐3 ′ and R: 5 ′‐CCAGCCCATGAATGGTTCTGAT‐3 ′, Bcl-2 F: 5 ′- TCAGAGCCTTTGAGCAGGTAG‐3 ′ and R: 5 ′‐AAGGGCTCTAAGGTCATTC‐3 ′, GAPDH F: 5 ′-TGTCCGGTCGTGGATCTGAC‐3 ′ and R: 5 ′‐AAACACGCAACCTCAAAGC‐3 ′, and Tp53 F: 5 ′- TGACTGGTACCACCATCCACTA‐3 ′ and R: 5 ′‐ CCTGCTTCAACCACCTTCTTG ‐3 ′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!