The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Raptor biphenyl column

Manufactured by Restek
Sourced in United States

The Raptor Biphenyl column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of analytes. The column features a biphenyl stationary phase, which provides unique selectivity for a variety of compound classes, including aromatic and polar compounds. The column is suited for use in various HPLC applications, such as pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using raptor biphenyl column

1

Steroid Biomarker Analysis by LCMS-ESI-SIM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LCMS with electrospray ionization and selected ion monitoring (LCMS-ESI-SIM; ThermoScientific TSQ Quantiva) was used to analyze the extract of steroid biomarkers from the glass beads. Four 4mm glass beads from each participant were washed with 50 μL of 70/30 LCMS water/ACN (1% formic acid) in glass LCMS vials and then transferred to a second LCMS vial with a clean glass insert. 2 μL of glass bead extract was injected into the instrument for analysis by LCMS-ESI-SIM. Chromatography of the extract was accomplished using a Restek Raptor Biphenyl column (200 mm × 2.1 mm; 2.7 um bead) held at 30C and a water/ACN (0.1% formic acid) binary solvent system. The solvent flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min with a gradient of ACN from 10% - 100% over 3 minutes followed by a column washing step for 1-minute at 100% ACN and a 3-minute column equilibrium step at 10% ACN before the next sample injection. Mass spectrometer settings used for detection of steroid biomarkers were as follows: 3kV in positive ion mode, 0.4 resolution, 20usec dwell time, 300 °C vaporizer temperature and ion transfer tube temperature, 50abs N2 sheath gas, 25Arb N2 aux gas. Table 1 shows the steroid biomarkers tracked in the extract samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stationary phase involved a Raptor Biphenyl column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm) acquired from Restek (Milan, Italy), and a Raptor Biphenyl UHPLC (5 × 2.1) was used as a guard column. The mobile phase was a mixture of (A) ultrapure water and (B) methanol, both with the addition of 0.02% of acetic acid, eluting under the following gradient conditions: 0.0–0.3 min 10% B, 0.3–5.0 min 100% B, 5.0–8.0 min 100% B, 8.1 min 10%. B. The final run time was 10.0 min. The flow rate was 0.45 mL min−1, the injection volume was 1.0 µL, and the oven temperature was set at 45 °C.
The ESI worked in negative polarity ion mode (NI) and the mass spectrometer was used in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The optimized instrumental parameters were set as follows: nebulizing gas flow 3.0 L/min; heating gas flow 10 L/min; drying gas flow 10 L/min; interface temperature 300 °C; DL temperature 250 °C; heat block temperature 400 °C. The unit mass resolution was established and maintained in each mass-resolving quadrupole by keeping a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of approximately 0.7 u. The SRM transitions with the related dwell times and the optimized compound-dependent parameters, such as voltage potential Q1, Q3, and collision energy (CE), are reported in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials (SM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Polyphenol Metabolites in Chicken Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chicken plasma samples were first hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase/sulfatase from Helix pomatia (Type 1H, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The identification and quantification of (poly)phenol metabolites in plasma after GSE consumption was performed using micro-elution solid phase extraction (μ-SPE), as previously described [33 (link),34 (link)], followed by UPLC-Q-q-Q MS. The detection of target metabolites was performed on a SHIMADZU Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (LCMS-8060, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) through an electro-spray ionization (ESI) source in negative mode. Extracted samples (5 μL) were injected through a Raptor Biphenyl column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with a compatible Raptor Biphenyl Guard Cartridge (5 × 2.1 mm, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) in the UPLC system following a previously validated separation method [30 (link)]. Authentic standards were injected for the identification and quantification of individual (poly)phenols. Recoveries of the compounds during μ-SPE were estimated with the isotopically labeled internal standard (±) catechin-2,3,4-13C3 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Analysis of the plasma (poly)phenols were performed on 4 hens from (control) group, 5 hens from (1% LT) group and 5 hens from (2% ST) group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Uptake of Mito-LND into Mitochondria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For measuring uptake of Mito-LND into isolated mitochondria59 (link),60 (link), we incubated Mito-LND (10 µM) with mouse liver mitochondria (1.5 mg/mL) in nonionic mannitol plus a sucrose-based buffer (220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 10 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2% fatty acid-free BSA, pH 7.2) at room temperature for 2 min, followed by additional 2 min incubation in the presence or absence of mitochondrial uncoupler, FCCP (1 µM). Next, the suspension was centrifuged (7000 g, 1 min) and the concentration of Mito-LND in the supernatant was measured by HPLC (Agilent 1100 HPLC system with UV-Vis and fluorescence detectors). The mitochondrial supernatant was injected onto a Raptor Biphenyl column (Restek, 50 mm × 4.6 mm, 2.7 µm) equilibrated with mobile phase containing water:acetonitrile mixture (1:1 by vol.) and trifluoroacetic acid (0.1% by vol.). Mito-LND was eluted by increasing the acetonitrile content in the mobile phase from 50 to 100% (by vol.) over 3 min, at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. For Mito-LND quantification, fluorescence traces (excitation at 300 nm, emission at 420 nm) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Receptor Fluid and Extract Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system used for analysis of receptor fluid (from the in vitro studies) and extracts from dosed skin, urine, and feces (from the in vivo studies) was composed of an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 1100 HPLC system with an in-line INUS β-RAM3 radiochemical detector. Mobile phases consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B). EH-TBB study samples were separated using a Restek (State College, PA) Raptor biphenyl column (2.7 μm, 4.6 mm×50 mm). Elution involved a gradient method: initial conditions (99% A) were maintained for 1 min; A was then reduced to 0% over 1 second and held at 0% A for 5 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. BEH-TEBP study samples were separated using the same column and mobile phases with a gradient method: initial conditions (60% A) were maintained for 5 min; A was then reduced to 10% over 2 min then to 0% A over 13 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. In all cases, the column was returned to initial conditions and allowed to equilibrate for 2 min before re-use. Scintillant flow (Inflow ES, Lablogic Corp.) was maintained at 2 mL/min initially and increased to 4 mL/min around regions of interest. Laura4 (Lablogic Corp.) software was used for instrument control and analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phytochemical Profiling of Latex using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Latex phytochemicals were identified by employing ultra-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESIMS/MS) [21 (link)]. A Waters Acquity UPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) chromatography system, coupled with ESI Xevo TQD triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, was used for phytochemicals identification. Latex phytochemicals were separated in a positive ionization mode in a Restek Raptor biphenyl column (100 mm length × 2.1 mm diameter × 1.8 micrometer particle size). Chromatographic analyte separations were carried out using a gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid in 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile under linear gradient conditions (A:B % v/v, 0–0.5 min: 80:20; 0.5–14 min: 30:70; 14–15 min: 80:20) at 0.6 mL/min flow rate. The column temperature was maintained at 50 °C. Cone gas flow of 10 L/h, desolvation gas flow of 1000 L/h, capillary voltage of 0.70 kV, source temperature of 150 °C, and desolvation temperature of 450 °C were maintained for the source-dependent parameters. Ion detection was performed in the multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by monitoring the transition pairs. The compounds were identified based on standards prepared in methanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma Phenolic Metabolite Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of phenolic metabolites from plasma samples was performed by micro-elution solid phase extraction (μ-SPE) and measured by UPLC-Q-q-Q MS, as per the protocol of a validated method. 62 Briefly, undiluted plasma samples were acidified with 4% phosphoric acid (v : v 1 : 1). This mix (total volume of 600 μL) was then loaded onto Oasis 96-well reversed-phase HLB (hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced) sorbent μ-SPE plates (Waters, Eschborn, Germany), washed with water and 0.2% acetic acid, and eluted using 90 μL of methanol. Identification and quantification of ( poly)phenol metabolites were performed on a SHIMADZU Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (LCMS8060, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). Five microliters of the eluded samples were then injected through a Raptor Biphenyl column 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm (Restek, Bellefonte, USA) with a compatible Raptor Biphenyl Guard Cartridges 5 × 2.1 mm (Restek, Bellefonte, USA) in the UPLC system. A 14-minute gradient followed by a 2-minute equilibration was applied to the run under a flow rate of 0.5 mL min -1 at 30 °C. The identification of metabolites was performed by comparing retention times with authentic standards in corresponding multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions and quantified by calibration curves made from standard mixes using SHIMADZU LabSolutions™ LCMS Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Analytes by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were performed on a Xevo TQ-XS triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK) connected to an I-Class Acquity UPLC with a flow-through needle (FTN) autosampler. The instrument was operated in ESI + mode. Probe capillary voltage was 2.0 kV. Desolvation and source temperature were 450 and 150 °C, respectively. Source offset was 30 V. Gas flows were: desolvation gas, 800L/h, collision gas flow 1.0 mL/min; and nebulizer, 7.0 bar. Argon was used for collision-induced dissociation (CID). Instrument parameters for MRM transitions are given in Table 1. Analytes were separated on a Restek Raptor Biphenyl column (1.8 μm, 100 × 2.1 mm) preceded by a Restek Biphenyl Precolumn (1.8 μm, 5 × 2.1 mm). Chromatography conditions were initially, 1% B for 30 s, increasing to 50% B over 8 min followed by 99% B for 1.1 min, returning to 1% B for 1.4 min. Mobile phase A was water containing 0.1% formic acid. Mobile phase B was methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. LC flow rate was 400 μL/min. Column temperature was 60 °C. Autosampler temperature was 10 °C. Needle wash was 1:1:1:1 methanol: water: acetonitrile: isopropanol. Purge solvent was water with 0.1% formic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Lonidamine and Mito-LND

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in 10-cm dishes and incubated with the compounds for 24 h in complete medium. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses were performed on cell extracts using Shimadzu Nexera2 UHPLC system equipped with UV-Vis absorption and triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS8030) detectors. Detection of lonidamine was accomplished using Raptor Biphenyl column (Restek, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm) equilibrated with mobile phase containing water:methanol (MeOH) mixture (4:1). LND was eluted by increasing the content of MeOH from 20 to 100% over 5 min and detected in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the transition of 319.10 > 274.95 (negative mode). Mito-LND was analyzed using a Kinetex F5 column (Phenomenex, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) equilibrated with a mobile phase containing water (75%), MeCN (25%) and formic acid (0.1%). Mito-LND was eluted by increasing the content of MeCN in the mobile phase from 25 to 100% over 5 min and detected in the MRM mode using the transition of 720.20 > 262.00 (positive mode). For both LND and Mito-LND analyses, the mobile phase flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!