The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Imaging spacer

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Japan

Imaging spacers are specialized laboratory equipment used to create precise and uniform spacing between samples during imaging processes. They are designed to ensure consistent and reproducible sample positioning, which is crucial for accurate data collection and analysis in various scientific applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using imaging spacer

1

Fluorescence Imaging of Protein Condensates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To increase contrast during fluorescence imaging, Cy5 (free or RNA-labelled), Alexa Fluor 488 (Alexa 488; Thermo Fisher Scientific) or mCitrine (YFP), were included at final concentrations of 1 μM, 0.6 μM and 2 μM, respectively. Images were captured at room temperature using a Leica TCS-SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope and an HCX PL APO CS 63x (NA 1.40) oil immersion objective. Samples were illuminated with 488 nm (Alexa 488), 514 nm (YFP), or 633 nm (Cy5) lasers, with power and gain settings adjusted to give mean fluorescence intensity values of protein condensates of approximately 50–70% of the maximum 16-bit depth (∼32,000–46,000 a.u.). Images were typically captured with settings of 256 × 256 pixels at ∼ 98 × 98 × 98 nm (XYZ) resolution, 1400 Hz scan speed and a line average of 2.
Phase separation was initiated by mixing protein solutions with a buffer of lower ionic strength, as described above, and were left for 10 min to promote droplet growth. Phase separated solutions were then transferred to a 0.22 mm thick siliconized glass coverslip (Hampton Research), before sealing with 0.12 mm imaging spacers (Sigma) and a second siliconized glass coverslip. Samples were then left to equilibrate for approximately 50 min prior to imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Zygote Chromatin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After zygote collection, the cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min, before permeabilization in 0.2% Triton X‐100/PBS (PBSTX) for 30 min. Cells were then blocked in 10% goat serum (Dako) in PBSTX either at 4°C overnight or for several hours at 4°C followed by incubation at room temperature. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in primary antibody (anti‐Scc1, Millipore #05‐908, 1:250). After washing in blocking solution for at least 30 min, incubation with the secondary antibody (anti‐mouse IgG (H + L), Thermo Fisher Scientific #A‐11001, 1:500) was carried out for 1 h at room temperature. Another set of washing steps in 0.2% PBSTX was followed by a quick PBS wash and mounting of the cells in Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Labs) using imaging spacers (Sigma‐Aldrich). In situ fixed zygotes were imaged on a confocal microscope (LSM780, Zeiss, ZEN black) using a 63×, 1.4NA oil objective. The presence of DNA compaction reminiscent of vermicelli in Wapl zygotes was classified using ImageJ and 3D visualization by Imaris (8.1.2). Brightness and contrast of images presented were adjusted using ImageJ software. No blinding or randomization was used for handling of the cells. Samples were excluded from the analysis if cells were not fertilized or in the wrong cell cycle phase (PN stage).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SRS Measurement of Deuterated Propofol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Propofol-d17 was diluted to make a stock solution of 100 mM. On a thin 24 × 60 mm cover glass slide (Matsunami), 5 μL of 100 mM propofol-d17 was pipetted directly on the slide. The propofol-d17 was sandwiched between the glass slide and a 24 × 24 mm cover glass; a 0.1 mm thick imaging spacer (Sigma) separated the two cover glasses. Using a previously described SRS system (Ozeki et al., 2019 ; Shou et al., 2021 (link)), the propofol-d17 spectra was measured between the wavenumbers of 2000–2300 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Bacterial Cellular Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Live-cell imaging of the bacteria cells cultured was performed in an imaging spacer (Sigma) with a temperature-controlled confocal microscope (Nikon C2plus, Yokohama, Japan). The cell membrane was labeled with FM4-64 (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at 8 ng/μL. The images from bright, green (488 nm), and red (560 nm) fluorescent channels were captured for subsequential analysis. To ensure enough cell number for SEM analysis, bacteria at the late exponential phase were collected by centrifugation (Eppendorf centrifuge 5453, Hamburg, Germany) at 5000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, followed by two washings with M63 minimal medium, and fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde at 4 °C. All of the procedures including dehydration, embedding, sectioning, and staining were performed according to our previous protocols [23 (link)]. The bacteria cells were then visualized using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 3 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!