The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using fluoview viewer software

1

Visualizing Mitochondrial Dynamics in MELAS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For visualization of mitochondria, cells were seeded onto a chamber slide after 4 days of treatment (µ-Slide 8 well, Ibidi GmbH, Martinsried, Germany), stained with Mitotracker Green (250 nM) (Invitrogen) and placed in an incubator at 37 °C for 40 min. After staining, the remaining dye was removed, and stained cells were mounted onto a perfusion chamber in culture media and imaged at 37 °C using an Olympus FluoView FV 1200 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
To track the internalization of Pep-1-labeled MitoGFP (Pep-1-MitoGFP) in MELAS cybrid cells expressing MitoRFP, three dimensional (3D) reconstructions were generated from confocal microscopy images combined with difference interference contrast (DIC). To determine the distribution of Pep-1-MitoGFP and innate MitoRFP within host cells, line scans through the z-axis were integrated to yield a longitudinal view, which were combined (0.55 μm z-steps) using Olympus Fluoview Viewer software. Innate MitoRFP and internalized Pep-1-MitoGFP in host cells were quantified at different time points by calculating the mean area of red and green fluorescence (pixels) per cell within the same section thickness (μm) using ImageJ Software. The expression of MitoRFP and Pep-1-MitoGFP in the incomplete cells was excluded to calculate in the z-stack images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections (5 μm) of tumor xenograft or metastatic lung nodes were deparaffinized and blocked and incubated with primary antibody (Cell Signaling, Shanghai, China) against PEAK1 and Ki67 (tumor xenograft), E-cadherin and vimentin (metastatic lung nodes). Then, the slides were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and peroxidase activity was visualized using a substrate solution of diaminobenzidine (DAB) containing 0.03% hydrogen peroxid, and counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. Tissue sections were washed in water, dehydrated, cleared, mounted and observed using Olympus FLUOVIEW Viewer software (Tokyo, Japan). Within the tissue core, the most representative tumor area of standardized size was selected at ×200 magnification. The staining intensity in this area was measured if the area contained >5% epithelial cells. Stains were scored as negative (−), weak (+), intermediate (++), and strongly positive (+++) as reported [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging Zebrafish and Human Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated and mounted in 1% low-melting agarose on a 35 mm glass-bottomed dish (Asahi Techno Glass) with 0.016% tricaine (Sigma-Aldrich) in fish medium, as described previously [33 (link)]. The dish was submerged in fish medium with 0.001% tricaine.
Confocal images were taken with an FV1000 confocal upright microscope system (Olympus) equipped with a 4× water-immersion lens (XLFluor, NA 0.28) and a 20× water-immersion lens (XLUMPlanFL, NA 1.0). The 405-nm, 473-nm, and 559-nm laser lines were used for the nuclear stain (Hoechst, DAPI), green fluorescence molecules (EGFP, Alexa488), and red fluorescence protein (mCherry), respectively. Images of mouse ductus arteriosus were obtained with an FV1000 equipped with a 60× oil-immersion lens (UPlanSApo, NA 1.35). Image files were processed and analyzed using FLUOVIEW Viewer software (Olympus) and Volocity (PerkinElmer). Images of the HUVECs were obtained with an inverted IX81 microscope with a 40× lens (UPlanSApo, NA 0.95) (Olympus), and analyzed using Metamorph (Molecular Devices).
The images of hyper-resolution microscopy were collected with an IX83 electric inverted microscope equipped with an SD-OSR device for hyper-resolution processing (Olympus), using a 100× silicon oil-immersion lens (UPLSAPO100xS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Zebrafish Bone Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated and mounted in 1% low-melting agarose on a 35 mm glass bottomed dish (Asahi Techno Glass) with 0.016% tricaine (Sigma-Aldrich) in fish medium as described previously48 (link). The dish was submerged in fish medium containing 0.001% tricaine. Bone staining with alizarin red s (Wako) was performed as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
Confocal images were obtained with an FV1000 confocal upright microscope system (Olympus) equipped with a 20× water-immersion lens (XLUMPlanFL, NA 1.0). 473 nm and 559 nm laser lines were employed for green fluorescence protein (GFP and Kaede-green), and red fluorescence molecules (mCherry and alizarin red s), respectively. Image files were processed and analyzed using FLUOVIEW Viewer software (Olympus), MetaMorph (Molecular Devices), and Volocity (perkinelmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections of 5 μm in thickness paraffin block were placed on adhesive-coated slides. Then, sections were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated in graded ethanol (from 100 to 70%) and heated for 30 min in a sodium citrate buffer to increase epitope exposure. Additionally, slides were treated with 0.3% (v/v) H2O2 in for 5 min, washed with 0.01 M PBS and blocked with 1% BSA, 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then incubated overnight at 4°C with monoclonal antibody against: Forkhead box P3 (Foxp3 CellSignaling, Danvers, MA, United States), monoclonal antibody against fibroblast surface protein 1, FSP-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), monoclonal antibody against alpha-smooth muscle actin, α-SMA (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and monoclonal antibodies against E-cadherin and N-cadherin (CellSignaling, Danvers, MA, United States). The optimal dilution for all antibodies was 1:100. The reaction antigen-antibody was visualized with avidin-biotin-peroxidase by using 3,3-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen which resulted in brown staining. Slides were counterstained in Harris hematoxylin. Samples were then dehydrated, preserved with a coverslip and reviewed using light microscopy. Pictures were viewed using Olympus FLUOVIEW Viewer software (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed for 20 min at room temperature with 4% (w/v)
paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% (w/v) sucrose.
Cultures were washed with PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS
for 6 min, again washed in PBS and blocked for 1 h at
room temperature. After labeling with a first primary antibody
(1–3 h at room temperature or overnight at
4 ºC) and washing with PBS, cultures were incubated with
fluorescent secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 546 or 633
(1 h at room temperature) and washed with PBS. The cells were
visualized using a spectral confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000, Tokyo, Japan).
Images were captured and digitized using Olympus Fluoview Viewer software. For
some experiments (see Figure 6), cells were
observed with an Olympus Spining Disk (DSU) microscope equipped for TIRF. Images
were captured using a charged-coupled camera (Andor Ixon3, Andor Oxford
Instruments, Oxfordshire, UK). Images were digitized using Olympus Fluoview
Viewer software. In some cases, the images were analyzed using ImageJ (National
Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA) software. All images were processed
using Adobe PhotoShop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal microscopy was performed with using a confocal microscope Olympus FV1200 with Tilescan (Olympus, Japan). Images were captured and digitized using Olympus Fluoview Viewer software using a 1024 × 1024 scan format with 20x and 63x objective. All images were processed using Adobe PhotoShop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Activated β1 Integrin Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C28/I2 cells were mixed with AG, AG/Col, or AG-Col gels and cultured for 24 h before staining. The cell-gel constructs were fixed with 4% paraformldehyde. After rinsing, the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 45 min at room temperature, and then incubated with blocking buffer (5% BSA, serum, 20% Polyvinylpyrrolidone (Amresco) in PBS combined into 1:1:1 ratio) overnight at 4 °C. The samples were incubated with primary antibodies against activated β1 integrin (clone HUTS-4; 1:500; Millipore) or total β1 integrin (clone P5D2; 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C, and then with Alex Fluor 488 anti-mouse IgG (1:1000; Invitrogen) overnight at 4 °C. Finally, cell nuclei were labeled with 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma). An Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope was used to visualize activated and total β1 integrins and cell nuclei. Images were acquired using a 60× objective lens (1.2 numerical aperture; Olympus). Cells were selected randomly. The fluorescence signal was quantified by measuring average intensity in individual cells using Fluoview Viewer software (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Calcium Signaling in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium signalling was performed as previously described [19 (link), 22 (link)]. Briefly, cells were grown until ∼80 % confluency on glass-bottomed FluoroDishes (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). Cells were serum starved for 3 h and pre-treated for 1 h with S1PR1 antagonist (NIBR-0213) [23 (link)] or left in serum-free media. The cells were washed with 1 ml 37 °C HBSS (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20 mM HEPES buffer (Invitrogen) and 5.5 mM glucose (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were then loaded with 2 μM Fluo-8 AM (Invitrogen) in supplemented 37 °C HBSS for 40 min at 37 °C and 5 % CO2. Fluo-8 AM dye was removed and cells were washed with 37 °C supplemented HBSS. Next, cells were left to rest in 1 ml supplemented HBSS at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. Calcium responses were recorded using an Olympus FV1000 Confocal Microscope with ×20 lens. For analysis, images were obtained at a rate of 1 frame/2 s for a total of 250 s. Images were then analysed using the Olympus Fluoview viewer software. Fluorescence was normalised to mean baseline fluorescence (0–30 s) (ΔF/F0). GraphPad Prism 4 software was used to generate calcium response traces presented as ΔF/F0 over time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualizing LDLR Localization in HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 cells were cultured in glass-bottom cell culture plates at 37 °C for 12 h. After 6 h of starvation with a serum-free medium, cells were overlaid with medium containing R and Q for another 24 h. Following this, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%) for 15 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.1%) for 5 min, and then cells were blocked in BSA (5% in PBS) for at least 1 h and incubated with antibody against LDLR (1:250 in BSA) overnight at 4 °C. After being washed with PBS three times, cells were immunostained with secondary fluorescence antibody for 1 h at room temperature [52 (link)]. The cell nucleus was visualized with DAPI. After washing with PBS three times, cells were examined using a confocal microscopy, and the fluorescence intensity was analyzed with Fluoview viewer software (Olympus) [47 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!