The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using g6257

1

Hydrogel Ultrastructure Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogel samples were prepared as described in the compression tests. After 24 h in PBS, the samples were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5% diluted in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, G6257, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 2 h. The samples were then dehydrated by immersion in graded ethanol solutions in Milli-Q water: 50% (once for 10 min), 70% (twice for 10 min), 90% (thrice for 10 min), 96% (thrice for 10 min), and 100% (thrice for 10 min). The samples were then placed in a critical point dryer (Leica EM CPD300, Austria) and imaged using ultrahigh-resolution scanning electron microscopy (Nova NanoSEM 230, FEI Company, Netherlands). On hydrogels with cells, the samples were fixed and dehydrated at the respective time points using the same protocol, followed by critical point drying and imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Fibrin Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ExThr and EnThr fibrin samples were fixed by immersion in 1% glutaraldehyde (G6257, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h, followed by washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 10010001, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) and distilled water. Thereafter, the samples were pre-frozen at −80 °C and then lyophilized in a freeze-dryer Freezone 2.5 (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) at temperature of −40 °C and pressure lower than 0.133 mBar during 2 days.
Samples were mounted on stubs and gold/palladium coating (7 nm) was sputtered on using an EM ACE200 (Leica Mikrosysteme, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Surface structure of samples was investigated with a scanning electron microscope S-3400N (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) in the high vacuum mode at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Microscope software was used to measure fiber diameter and pore size in each SEM image. At least 50 measurements were conducted for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating TTR Aggregation Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of test compounds to prevent TTR aggregation was evaluated under the acidic conditions that favor TTR aggregation and fibril formation. A 2 μL solution of 167 μM human TTR (ACRO Biosystems #H5223) was incubated with 7 μL of 50 mM sodium acetate pH 4.0 (Sigma-Aldrich #S7545) and 100 mM KCl (Sigma-Aldrich #S5405) in the presence or absence of 1 μL TTR inhibitor for 72 h at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation, 3.5 μL of 500 mM sodium phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich #S5136) buffer pH = 8.0 was added to each sample for neutralization and 0.6 μL of 5% CHAPS (Sigma-Aldrich #C5070) as a detergent to prevent reassociation of protein. The cross-linking was performed by adding 1.5 μL of 5% glutaraldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich #G6257). After 4 min, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2.5 μL freshly made 5% NaBH4. The samples were subjected to TTR Western blotting with prealbumin antibodies (1:500; Dako #A0002). Band intensity for TTR monomer and TTR aggregates was quantified from scanned images of the blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying β-galactosidase Activity in Astrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate b-gal activity astrocytes were seeded 24 h before the test in 70% confluency. Cells were fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde (G6257, Sigma) in PBS for 5 min, washed 3 times, and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in staining solution (pH 6.0, 2% 5‑bromo-4‑chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-gal, INA-1758–03–00), 10 mM potassium ferrocyanide (244,023, Sigma), 10 mM ferricyanide (P9387, Sigma), 150 mM sodium chloride (S7653, Sigma) and 1 mM magnesium chloride (M8266, Sigma). After 3 h, cells washed with PBS and nuclei stained with DAPI (4′,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole, Dilactate, 1:10,000, D3571, Molecular probes, Invitrogen). Cultures were examined under phase-contrast microscopy, DAPI was detected under fluorescent microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Covalent Polyacrylamide Gel Attachment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used 35 mm glass bottomed Cell Culture Dishes (500027, Porvair). To covalently attach the polyacrylamide gel onto glass, we used a a similar procedure as in52 (link). Glass surfaces were cleaned with NaOH, incubated with a 0.5% EtOH solution of 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (440140, SIGMA) and then immersed in a 0.5% Glutaraldehyde (G6257, SIGMA). Intensive rinsing with either H20 or EtOH was performed between all steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated as above. The cells were harvested, washed, and fixed overnight with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (G6257; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) containing 1% tannic acid. After washing, the cell pellets were embedded in Araldite-Epon. The ultrathin sections were observed with a Hitachi h-7650 electron microscope, and representative images were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation of Functionalized Polyacrylamide Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For preparing polyacrylamide (PA) gel substrates, glass bottom dishes were sequentially treated with 3‐Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (281 778, APTMS, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) for 10 min and 0.5% glutaraldehyde (G6257, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) for 30 min. The PA‐gel premixture was prepared using acrylamide (A8887, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) and N,N'‐methylene bisacrylamide (M7279, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) in a 1:1 ratio. Then, 0.05% ammonium persulfate (A3678, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) and 0.15% N,N,N´,N´‐tetramethylethylenediamine (T9281, Invitrogen, MA, USA) were added into the mixture. PA hydrogel stiffness was determined by concentrations of acrylamide and bisacrylamide.[81
] The mixed PA solution was incubated in pre‐treated glass bottom dishes and covered with a dichlorodimethylsilane (Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA)‐treated glass coverslip to flatten the gel. After polymerization, the coverslip was removed from the PA gel. For functionalization of the PA hydrogel surface, 50 mm sulfosuccinimidyl‐6‐(4′‐azido‐2′‐nitrophenylamino) hexanoate (22 589, sulfo‐SANPAH, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), a heterobifunctional cross‐linker, was supplemented on the PA hydrogel and exposed to UV light for 5 min. After washing in 200 mm HEPES, the PA hydrogel was coated with 50 µg ml−1 FN and left overnight. Experiments were performed after washing with PBS before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrospun Gelatin Nanofiber Membrane Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare the gelatin solution for the electrospinning, gelatin type A (G1890 Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in a 70% acetic acid solution (695092, Sigma Aldrich) and 30% distilled water. The gelatin solution (25%, w/v) was then placed into a 5 mL syringe and connected to a 23-gauge needle. The electrospinning machine (TL-01, Tong Li Tech) fabricated the nanofiber membrane using a flow rate of 1 mL/h, a 17 kV voltage, and a 15 cm distance from the needle to the collector. The nanofibers were collected on the cover glass, covered with aluminum foil, and evaporated overnight at RT to remove residual solvent. The samples were then crosslinked with glutaraldehyde (G6257, Sigma Aldrich) in a vapor crosslinking system and evaporated overnight at RT to remove residual solvent. The nanofiber membranes were soaked in PBS and then separated from the foil. The fabricated samples were sterilized under UV for 30 min for in vitro and ex vivo studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of Gelatin Sponge Biomaterial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gelatin solution was prepared with a weight ratio of 10 to 90 of gelatin (G9391-Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and distilled water (Pars Company, Dastgerd, Iran) at a temperature of 80 °C on a hot plate. Then, the temperature decreased to 50 °C and two percent (w/w%) of glycerol (Millipore Merck-EMSURE grade, code 104092) was added to the solution. It was then stirred on a hot plate at 30 °C and one percent (w/w%) of glutaraldehyde (G6257-Sigma Aldrich) as a crosslinking agent was added; stirring continued. The resulting solution was poured into a mechanical stirrer and stirred for one hour. The resulting foam was then poured into rectangular molds and placed in a freezer at −40 °C for 24 h. The frozen material was placed in a freeze-dryer for 24 h and dried. The final dried product (gelatin sponge) was cut into the desired dimensions. The cut material was packaged and sterilized by gamma rays (25 kgry). Figure 1 shows a scheme for the reaction steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of Fibrin/Alginate Scaffold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents needed for manufacturing the fibrin/alginate (FA) matrix (Patent ID: WO2013164635 A1) were whisked into a white foam that was cast on top of the alkaline-etched MEW 3D PCL structures. The foam was allowed to clot for 1 h at 37 °C before chemical crosslinking with 0.2% vol/vol glutaraldehyde (G6257, Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in 80% ethanol/20% MES (2-(N-morpholino ethanesulfonic acid (69889, Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK, 0.1 M, pH = 7.4) buffer for 4 h at room temperature. The scaffolds were washed with 0.1% wt/vol sodium borohydride (452882, Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in diH2O and diH2O at room temperature before lyophilisation for 36 h at –40 °C (Virtis Genesis Freeze Dryer, Biopharma, Winchester, UK) (Figure 1B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!