The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

90 protocols using in vivo imaging system ivis

1

Liver-Targeting Nanoparticles: In Vivo Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liver-biotargeting capability of PVA/PBAE/PLGA nanoparticles was analyzed by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. PVA/PBAE/PLGA nanoparticles were carried on the Cy5.5 near-infrared fluorescence markers, and the tissue distribution of nanoparticles in mice was investigated by using the IVIS in vivo imaging system (39 (link)). Typically, sixteen nude mice (Experimental Animal Center of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, China) were randomly separated into four groups (n = four per group) and were injected with normal saline (control), free Cy5.5, PVA/PBAE/PLGA/Cy5.5 and PBAE/PLGA/Cy5.5 nanoparticles via tail vein, and then imaged using IVIS in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, USA) at 6 and 24 h post the injection point in time, and main organs (heart, liver, kidney, spleen, and lung) observed and photographed using IVIS in vivo imaging system, to evaluate the distribution of nanoparticles in nude mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Vivo EPC Tracking by BLI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transduced EPCs were collected by trypsin digestion, suspended in 10 % sucrose, and mixed with RADA16 solution, free tacrolimus+RADA16 solution, or T-RNPs+RADA16 solution, respectively. Afterwards, 200 μL of each mixture was injected in the hind limb of 4-week-old BALB/c mouse. In each group, the injected cell number was 1×106, the amount of tacrolimus was 50 μg and the final concentration of RADA16 was 0.5 % (w/v). Twelve hours post injection, the mouse was injected with 1.5 mg D-luciferin followed by in vivo bioluminescent imaging (BLI) with IVIS in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, USA). The bioluminescence intensity of EPCs was quantified and the date was recorded as day 0. At preset time points after injection, the EPCs were tracked by BLI and the bioluminescence intensity was plotted versus time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vivo Evaluation of Micellar Nano-DDS Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the uptake of the APTEDB-DPSE micellar nano-DDS in an in vivo xenograft model, U87MG cells were injected into the right flank of BALB/c nude mice (n = 3 mice per group) at 5 × 106 cells/mouse. After 3 weeks, tumor growth was measured, and the tumor volumes were determined to be 80-120 mm3. Then, 200 µg of the PEG2000-DSPE micellar nano-DDS in PBS or APTEDB-DSPE micellar nano-DDS in PBS was injected into each mouse, and at predetermined time points (15, 30, 60, and 120 min), the tumor uptake of rhodamine B-labeled micelles was compared using an IVIS in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NIR Imaging of Arthritic Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NIR images of mice under anesthesia with 2.5% isoflurane were obtained using an IVIS® In Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer, MA, USA) and the fluorescent intensity from the arthritic feet was quantified using the Living Images software version 4.3 (PerkinElmer, MA, USA). An ICG excitation wavelength of 745 nm and 840 nm emission filter was used. The regions of interest were chosen using an automatic operation mode. Then signal intensities were normalized to the lower NIR signal at 24 hours using this formula: NIRratioonthesamescanday=NIRsignalfromarthritic(atanytimes)thelowerNIRsignalfromarthriticmouse(at24hours)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biodistribution of Alginate Nanoparticles in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biodistribution of control (unmodified and scrambled peptide-modified alginate nanoparticles) and tuftsin-modified alginate nanoparticles was assessed upon performing in vivo near-infrared (NIR) imaging. A NIR fluorophore, indocyanine green (ICG), was encapsulated into the alginate nanoparticles at 5% (w/w), followed by surface modification as described above. The ICG-loaded alginate nanoparticles were obtained after ultracentrifugation at 30,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C, followed by lyophilization. The loading content of ICG was determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 750 nm. The ICG-loaded control and tuftsin-modified nanoparticles in phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) (3 mL of 1 mg/mL nanoparticles) were injected intraperitoneally into naïve rats and arthritic rats at day 19 post-adjuvant administration. Whole body images were obtained from 1 hour to 24 hours after injection using the IVIS in vivo imaging system (Perkin Elmer Inc., Hopkinton, MA, USA). Images of various organs, including heart, kidney, liver, spleen, lung, and paws were also obtained after sacrifice of the rat 24 hours after injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Breast Cancer Tumor Progression Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six – eight weeks old female, athymic nude mice purchased from Envigo Laboratories, Indianapolis, USA ((order code: 069(nu)/070(nu/+)) were injected with 5 × 106 breast cancer (BC) cells ((AU565: Her2+ and HCC 70 (Triple negative)) in 100μl of 1XPBS in the mammary fat pad. Mice were palpated starting at 6 days post tumor injection. Tumor weight was calculated according to this formula: weight in grams=[length in centimeters x (width in centimeters)2 ]/2.
We used the IVIS in vivo imaging system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) to monitor tumor progression TAB004 antibody was conjugated with fluorophore Indocyanine green (TAB-ICG, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, MD, USA). Prior to imaging the mice, TAB-ICG in sterile saline was administered retro-orbitally (RO) in mice and imaging was conducted 24 hours post TAB-ICG injections. Mice bearing AU565 and HCC70 tumors were imaged at 21, 49 and 54 days post tumor inoculation.
Tumor fluorescence was analyzed using the Life Science Software Suite (Perkin Elmer) and region of interest were defined at tumor location. In parallel, the presence of tumor masses was assessed by palpation and recorded weekly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bioluminescent Tumor Imaging in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were imaged for up to 34 days after injection. Bioluminescence imaging was performed using a highly sensitive, cooled CCD camera mounted in a light-tight specimen box (IVIS® In Vivo Imaging System; PerkinElmer). Animals were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane before imaging. To prepare for imaging, the mice were injected with 10 µL/10 g of body weight of luciferin (potassium salt, Xenogen, Alameda, CA, USA) 15 min prior to imaging. This dose and route of administration have been reported to be optimal for studies conducted in rodents. Images were acquired within 15 min post-luciferin administration. [26 (link)]. To perform the imaging, the mice were positioned on a heated stage within a light-sealed camera box and were continuously exposed to 1–2% isoflurane. Bioluminescence was detected with the IVIS® camera system for 45 s, which has been shown to yield optimal results. The low levels of light emitted from the tumors were captured, digitized, and displayed. The tumor areas were identified and quantified using Living Image® software as total photons per second. Following whole-body imaging, a laparotomy was conducted to collect blood and visualize potentially metastatic organs. The metastatic organs were either stored at −80 °C or collected in 4% PFA for immunohistochemical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In Vivo Eye Imaging of Fluorescent Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Towel-restrained rats received 30 μL fluorescently labeled formulations or R6G solution (2 mg/mL) to the left eye, with care taken to avoid spillage of dye from the eye. Imaging of the left eye with an IVIS in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) was conducted at 5 minutes before administration, and at different time points up to 24 hours after administration. Imaging was done under isoflurane in oxygen anesthesia. Fluorescence on the eye was quantitated with the IVIS image software. The fluorescence at 5 minutes was set as 100%, and that at following time points were normalized accordingly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were temporarily anesthetized with isoflurane and injected either intraperitoneally (i.p) or subcutaneously (s.c.) with luciferin (Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO) based on tumor location. 5–10 minutes later, mice were imaged using an IVIS® in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT). Images were taken at F-stop1 and medium binning with a series of exposures. Post-image processing and quantification was performed in Living Image® (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT) where intensity scales were normalized across time points for each cell line and region of interest (ROI) measured. Tumor volumes were calculated from two dimension measurements using the formula 0.5 × (length × width2) as described [16 (link), 17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Orthotopic Ovarian Cancer Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The therapeutic experiment was further conducted in an orthotopic ovarian cancer mouse model. 5 × 105 OVCAR8 cells were transduced with the lentiviral vector pEF1a-Luc2 to label them with luciferase and surgically injected into left side of the ovarian bursa of 7-week-old female (NSG) mice (Jackson Laboratory) under a dissecting microscope. After one week, the mice were subjected to bioluminescence imaging using the IVIS In Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer XMRS) and Living Image software after IP administration of the substrate D-luciferin. Based on the total flux (photons/s), calculated by the Living Image software from luminescence and body weight, mice were randomized into two groups (n=7/group) and subjected to IP administration of vehicle or vehicle-compound 12b. The 12b treatment was initiated at a dose of 20 mg/kg thrice per week. After 4 treatments, the dose was increased to 40 mg/kg for an additional 4 treatments. Body weight were recorded 3 times/week throughout the course of the experiment. Mice were euthanized after 19 days of treatment and all the major organs/tissues were harvested and bioimaged to visualize metastases specific to that organ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!