The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Benchmark

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in United Kingdom, Germany

Benchmark is a high-precision laboratory equipment designed for calibration and measurement tasks. It provides accurate and reliable results to ensure the quality and consistency of analytical processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using benchmark

1

Immunohistochemistry Protocol for TMAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All IHC was performed in an integrated laboratory (Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory) that has UK Clinical Pathology Accreditation [39 (link)]. Sections were cut from the whole face or TMA blocks for H&E staining and IHC. The initial H&E section was used to assess TMA quality and appropriate tumour, lymphoid, or stromal content for subsequent IHC localizations and analysis. Sections for IHC were cut at 4 microns on a rotary microtome, dried at 37°C overnight, and then used for IHC that was performed on automated immunostainers (Ventana BenchMark or Leica Bond-Max, Milton Keynes, UK). See Supp Table 2 for primary antibody, pretreatment, and biomarker detection details all of which were optimised prior to application to TMA sections. Subsequently, all sections were visualized with diaminobenzidine, counterstained with haematoxylin, and then dehydrated and tape-mounted using a Sakura autostainer. All slides were scanned on an Aperio AT2 Digital scanner at x40.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histologic Diagnosis of PDOX Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histologic diagnosis of PDOX tumors and matched patient samples was assessed by hematoxylin and eosin stained section by a board-certified neuropathologist (B.A.O.) according to the criteria specified in the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [23 (link)]. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-µm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections using automated Ventana Benchmark or Leica Bond III machines with appropriate secondary reagents. Specific antibody clones used are listed in Supplementary Table S1, Online Resource. Dual-color FISH was performed on 4 µm paraffin embedded tissue sections. Probes were derived from BAC clones (BACPAC Resources, Oakland, CA) and labeled with either AlexaFluor-488 or AlexaFluor-555 fluorochromes (Supplementary Table S2, Online Resource). Briefly, probes were co-denatured with the target cells on a slide moat at 90 °C for 12 min. The slides were incubated overnight at 37 °C on a slide moat and then washed in 4 M Urea/2xSSC at 25 °C for 1 min. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (200 ng/ml; Vector Labs) for viewing on an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope equipped with a 100 watts mercury lamp; FITC, Rhodamine, and DAPI filters; 100× PlanApo (1.40) oil objective; and a Jai CV digital camera. Images were captured and processed using the Cytovision v7.3 software from Leica Biosystems (Richmond, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MGMT Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on a Benchmark immunohistochemistry staining system (Bond; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with BOND polymer refine detection solution for DAB, using anti‐MGMT (1 : 800, abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab39253) primary antibody as substrate as previously described [45 (link)]. Images were acquired using an Olympus BX46 microscope (Shinjuku City, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described. MGMT immunoreactivity was scored semi‐quantitatively by multiplying the proportion of MGMT positive cells (%) and the staining intensity (0 = none; 1 = weak; 2 = intermediate; and 3 = strong). Statistical comparison was performed using paired Wilcoxon test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!