The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using nano advance

1

Mass Spectrometry Identification of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass Spectrometry of purified recombinant and native proteins was carried out to reveal their true identity. The bands corresponding to each protein were cut out and processed by in- gel tryptic digestion. The digested peptides were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid in LC-MS grade water and subjected to nano-LC (Nano Advance, Bruker, Germany) followed by identification by captive spray-Maxis-HD qTOF (Bruker, Germany) mass spectrometer (MS) with high mass accuracy and sensitivity. The peptides were enriched in nano trap column (Thermo Scientific) and eluted on to analytical column (Agilent) using a linear gradient of 5–45% acetonitrile at 400 nL/min over 65 min. Positive ions were generated by electro spray and the qTOF operated in data dependent acquisition mode. Data analysis was performed using MS program Mascot (2.4.1 Matrix Science, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-HPLC-MS/MS Protein Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Nano-HPLC system (nanoADVANCE, Bruker-Michrom, Billerica, MA, United States) was used to identify proteins automatically using a micro-column switching device coupled to an autosampler and a nanogradient generator. Peptide solution (5 μl) was loaded onto a C18 reversed-phase capillary column (100 μm ID × 30 cm, Zaplous αPep C18; AMR, Tokyo, Japan) in conjunction with a Magic AQ C18 trapping column (300 μm ID × 10 mm; Bruker-Michrom). The peptides were separated using a nanoflow linear acetonitrile gradient of buffer A (0.1% FA) and buffer B (0.1% FA, 99.9% acetonitrile), going from 5 to 45% buffer B over 50 min at a flow rate of 500 nl/min. The column was then washed in 95% buffer B for 5 min. Hystar 3.2 system control software (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA, United States) was used to control the entire process. The eluted peptides were ionized through a CaptiveSpray source (Bruker Daltonics) and introduced into a Maxis 3G Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) set up in a data-dependent MS/MS mode to acquire full scans (m/z acquisition range from 50 to 2,200 Da). The four most intense peaks in any full scan were selected as precursor ions and fragmented using collision energy. MS/MS spectra were interpreted, and peak lists were generated using DataAnalysis 4.1 and BioTools 3.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nano-HPLC Protein Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Nano-HPLC system (nanoADVANCE, Bruker Michrom., Billerica, MA) was used to identify proteins automatically using a micro-column switching device coupled to an autosampler and a nanogradient generator. Peptide solution (5 μl) was loaded onto a C18 reversed-phase capillary column (100 μm ID × 30 cm, Zaplous α X Pep C18: AMR, Tokyo, Japan) in conjunction with a Magic C18AQ trapping column (300 μm ID × 10 mm, Bruker). The peptides were separated using a nanoflow linear acetonitrile gradient of buffer A (0.1% FA) and buffer B (0.1% FA, 99.9% acetonitrile), going from 5 to 45% buffer B over 50 min at a flow rate of 500 nl/min. The column was then washed in 95% buffer B for 5 min. Hystar 3.2 system-control software (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA) was used to control the entire process. The eluted peptides were ionized through a CaptiveSpray source (Bruker Daltonics) and introduced into a Maxis 3G Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA) set up in a data-dependent MS/MS mode to acquire full scans (m/z acquisition range from 50 to 2200 Da). The four most intense peaks in any full scan were selected as precursor ions and fragmented using collision energy. MS/MS spectra were interpreted and peak lists were generated using DataAnalysis 4.1 and Biotools 3.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein concentration in CSF was determined by using the 2D Quant kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, UK), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and 400 µg total protein was used as input for profiling. All samples were loaded on an affinity removal column for the depletion of the 14 most abundant proteins (MARS-14, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After tryptic digestion, CSF samples were fractionated in 20 fractions using high pH reversed-phase C18 LC and each fraction was subsequently analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography (Bruker Daltonics; nano-Advance) connected online to an ultra-high resolution quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (Qq-TOF; Bruker Daltonics; maXis 4G ETD) as described previously50 (link).
Raw MS data were analyzed by MaxQuant software version 1.551 (link) with pre-defined Qq-ToF parameter settings against the RefSeq (release 55) human protein sequence database. We set cysteine carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification, whereas N-terminal acetylation, methionine oxidation, and deamidation of glutamine and/or asparagine were set as variable modifications. For further statistical analysis, only peptides with intensity above the detection limit in at least 75% of the samples in one of the groups (PD, MSA, or non-neurological controls) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis by Nanoflow LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The washed protein pellet was dissolved in 100 μL 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate by sonication for 5 minutes. The dissolved proteins were then reduced with 50 mM tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), alkylated with 360 mM acrylamide and finally digested with sequencing grade trypsin (Promega). Nanoflow LC-MS/MS was performed on a Nano-Advance (Bruker) HPLC. Samples were loaded onto a C18 trap column and then switched in-line with an analytical column (Bruker, 0.1 x 150 mm Magic C18 AQ 3.0μm, 200Å). Elution was performed at 0.8 μL/min, using a tailored gradient from 0%-35% acetonitrile (with 0.1% formic acid) over 60 minutes and then from 35%-45% acetonitrile (with 0.1% formic acid) in 10 minutes. The column outlet was directly interfaced to an amaZon Speed ETD (Bruker) mass spectrometer. Automated information dependent acquisition (IDA) was performed using Hystar PP 3.2.44.0 software, with a MS survey scan over the range m/z 350–1200 followed by three MS/MS spectra from 50–3000 m/z acquired during each cycle of 30 ms duration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identifying TTBK2-mediated KIF2A Phosphorylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the TTBK2-mediated phosphorylation sites on KIF2A, purified GST–KIF2A-N was subjected to a nonradioactive phosphorylation assay using TTBK2 and then precipitated using glutathione beads. The precipitated samples were eluted with guanidine solution (50-mM NH4HCO3 and 7-M guanidine-HCl). The eluates were subjected to reduction, alkylation, demineralization, and peptide enrichment, followed by digestion using trypsin. The phosphopeptides were enriched using the Titansphere Phos-TiO kit (GL Sciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry analysis was performed using a mass spectrometry system (Q Exactive; Thermo Fisher Scientific) combined with an ultra HPLC system (Nano-Advance; Bruker-Michrom, Inc.). The raw data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the Sequest algorithm at a precursor mass accuracy of 15 ppm and a tandem mass spectrometry tolerance of 0.02 D. The peptide search was performed against the UniProtKB Homo sapiens reference proteome dataset (release 2012_10) using a 1% false discovery rate threshold. The most likely phosphorylation site was determined using the PhosphoRS algorithm within the Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nano-LC-MS/MS Peptide Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lyophilized peptide fractions were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid in LC-MS-grade water and subjected to nano-LC (Nano-Advance; Bruker, Germany) followed by identification in captive ion source (Bruker Captive Spray tip) spray-in Maxis-HD qTOF (Bruker) mass spectrometer (MS) with high mass accuracy and sensitivity. The peptides were enriched in nano-trap column (Acclaim Pep Map, particle size 5 μm, pore size 100 Å; Thermo Scientific) and eluted on to nano-analytical column (Kaya Tech HIQ SIL C18HS/3, 0.1 × 150 mm, 3 μm particle size, and 200 Å pore size). The peptide elution was carried out using a linear gradient of 5–45% acetonitrile at 400 nl/min flow rate in a total run time of 135 keeping the solvent system as follows: solvent A, 100% water in 0.1% formic acid; and solvent B, 100% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Positive ions were generated by electrospray, and the q-TOF was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode to automatically switch between MS and MS/MS acquisition. Precursor ion TOF MS survey scan was acquired with a range of 300–1,800 m/z with resolution R = 75,000. Q1 sequentially selects six most intense precursor ions for fragmentation using collision-induced dissociation for MS-MS analysis with a fixed cycle time of 3 s along with 2 min of release for exclusion filter (Data acquisition otof software, version 24.8; Bruker Daltonics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano ESI-MS Based Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoflow electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (Nano ESI-MS) analysis was carried out using a Bruker nanoLC system (Nano Advance, BrukerDaltonics) along with a captive spray- Maxis-HD-qTOF mass spectrometer (BrukerDaltonics) with high accuracy and sensitivity. Digested peptides were desalted, concentrated on C18 reverse phase ZipTips, and eluted twice with 20 μL 60% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid before vacuum drying at room temperature. Peptides were resuspended in 10 μL 0.1% formic acid, and subjected to nLC-MS/MS. Peptides were separated using 15 cm long analytical columns (Bruker Magic C18AQ, 0.1 × 150 mm, 3 μm particle size and 200 Å pore size) of 135 minute gradient from 5% to 90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid and a flow rate of 400 nL per minute. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode with 3 intense precursor ions. Exclusion of all charges less than 2 and greater than 6 were used, and all unknown charges were kept in rejection mode. A dynamic exclusion of 20 seconds was used. Full mass spectrometry spectra scans were acquired with a scan range from 350 to 2200 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis via Nano-LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide digests were analyzed by electrospray ionization in the positive mode on an ion trap instrument Amazon Speed (Bruker, Bremen, Germany), using captive spray source. Two analytical replicates of every sample were done. Peptides were separated by nanoflow HPLC (NanoAdvance, Bruker, Bremen, Germany). UHPLC Nanotrap (100 μm i.d. × 25 mm long) packed with 200 A C18 stationary phase (5 μm, C18AQ, Michrom) was used for peptide trapping. Analytical columns (100 μm × 150 mm long) packed with 200 A C18 stationary phase (3 μm, C18AQ, Michrom) were coupled to the mass spectrometer (MS).
Peptide mixtures obtained after tryptic digestion were applied to the precolumn at a flow rate of 5 μL min−1 in 2% (v/v) acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. Peptides were eluted by a linear gradient of A (water, 0.1% formic acid) and B (acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid), as follows: 0 min – A (98%), B (2%); 50 min – A (5%), B (95%); 50–55 min – A (5%), B (95%) with flow rate of 400 nL min−1. Ion source conditions were optimized with a calibration solution according to the instrument provider. All MS survey scans were performed from m/z 400–1400 with enhanced resolution. Data analysis was performed by selection of the five most abundant precursors rejecting singly charged ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!