The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Snp 6.0 microarray

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The SNP 6.0 microarray is a high-throughput genotyping tool designed to interrogate genetic variation across the human genome. It is capable of simultaneously detecting and analyzing hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variations (CNVs) in a single experiment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using snp 6.0 microarray

1

Cross-Disorder Genetic Etiology Investigation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This project was a part of a multilateral collaborative project to investigate genetic etiology across four neurodevelopmental disorders: ADHD, ASD, OCD, and SCZ. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at The Hospital for Sick Children. A written informed consent was obtained from all participants or substitute decision makers. CNVs were detected on the same high-resolution microarray platform. The criteria for meeting a diagnosis of ASD, ADHD, OCD, or SCZ were detailed in our previous publications8 (link),10 (link),13 (link),23 (link),24 (link) with a few modifications for ADHD (see Supplementary Information). Data from all OCD individuals and 139/435 (32%) of the SCZ cohort had been previously published,11 (link),13 (link) but we included them here for comparative purposes (Supplementary Information). ADHD and ASD samples were not previously published. Additional supportive evidence for cross-disorder associations of selected CNVs came from our previously published schizophrenia cohorts11 (link),24 (link) and an additional ADHD cohort10 (link); all were genotyped on the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray (Table 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Admixture Analysis of Native American Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotype data from 112 CEU and 106 YRI from 1KG project; 401 NA samples from Moreno-Estrada et al.8 (link) (described in Supplementary Table 8) and 312 additional NA samples (103 Nahuas, 62 Totonacas, 49 Zapotecas, and 98 Mayas) genotyped with SNP 6.0 microarray (Affymetrix), were used for population admixture analysis. A total of 322,098 autosome-wide SNPs shared among these populations were used to generate MDS plots based on genome-wide identity by state pairwise distances as implemented in PLINK52 (link). Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7 show the estimated individual ancestry proportions for K = 3 to K = 10 in 312 NA samples, continental reference populations, and the 12 NA and 3 Mexican Mestizo whole genomes using ADMIXTURE53 (link). The fit of different values of K was assessed using cross-validation (CV) procedures, where K = 10 showed the lowest CV error (Supplementary Fig. 8).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Frequency of KANSL1 Microduplication in Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the frequency of KANSL1 microduplication in patients without 22q11.2DS, a second set of data from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray originating from population controls (cohort two) was employed19 (link). The cardiac phenotype information in these individuals is unavailable. The CNV filter and calling pipeline for this cohort of patients were the same as for 22q11.2DS cohort. The CNVs were identified, and the frequency of KANSL1 microduplication was calculated. In addition, data from a third cohort20 (link) of patients with available cardiac phenotype information was processed using ChAS 2.0 software (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The association between CHD phenotype and the presence of KANSL1 microduplication was calculated by Fisher’s exact test in the corresponding cohorts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

TCGA Germline Variant Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Germline variants were derived from the Affymetrix SNP6.0 microarray. Raw CEL files for the TCGA cohort were downloaded from FireCloud (https://software.broadinstitute.org/firecloud/) and the GDC legacy archive (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/legacy-archive). Probesets with non-unique mapping in the genome or not mapping to the location provided by Affymetrix (NetAffx Annotation Release 35) were removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCGA level 3 RNA-Seq version 2 RSEM data, segmented SCNA data (minus germline CNV), and TCGA level 3 mutation data of version 2016_01_28 were downloaded from GDC Data Portal. Mutation data were analyzed and summarized using maftools.18 Differential mutations between groups were accessed applying Fisher’s exact tests. KEGG pathway analyses were performed using DAVID 6.8 for differential mutated genes.19 (link),20 (link) SCNA events were detected by Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) 2.0 using the segmented Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray data.21 (link) SCNAs between groups were compared by Fisher’s exact tests. An R package, edgeR, was utilized to perform differential expression analysis.22 (link) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed by the GSEA desktop application v.3.0 using Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) v6.1 with 1,000 permutations.23 (link),24 (link) The estimation of immune cell proportions for each sample was performed by CIBERSORT algorithm on TCGA RNA-Seq data or Affymetrix HG133plus2 microarray data using LM22 as a reference expression signature with 100 permutations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Maternal Preeclampsia GWAS Replication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Directly genotyped lead SNPs or proxy SNPs (r2>0.5 in 1000 Genomes Northern Europeans from Utah (1KGP CEU)) from the 9 lead association signals in our study were interrogated in the previously described SOPHIA Caucasian maternal preeclampsia GWAS (177 preeclampsia cases, 116 normotensive controls) genotyped on the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray19 (link). These 9 lead association signals (all directly genotyped by whole genome sequencing) were also interrogated in the subset of European cases from the Inova study (35 preeclampsia cases, 340 normotensive controls). Logistic regression was performed for each ancestry group with PLINK v1.90 using the first 10 principal components as covariates (www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9)37 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SNP Array Analysis of Primary Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details for the SNP6.0 arrays have been previously described [8 (link)]. The SNP6 array data for primary tumors collected at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital were deposited in the dbGaP database (phs000352.vl.pl). Samples were genotyped using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays according to the manufacturer's instructions. CEL files were generated using GeneChip Command Console Software. SNP calls were generated using Genotyping Console (Affymetrix) and the Birdseed v2 algorithm with default parameters, with at least 50 arrays in each analysis. Array normalization and copy-number inference were performed according to a published workflow[31 (link)],[32 (link)]. Normalized data were viewed in dChip[33 (link)], and regions with abnormal copy number were identified computationally by circular binary segmentation (CBS)[34 (link)] and analyzed as described[31 (link)],[32 (link)]. All calls for gain and loss were manually reviewed as previous described [35 ] using dChip software [33 (link), 36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome-Wide Copy Number Profiling by SNP Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient copy number aberrations were determined using SNP6.0 microarrays according to manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Data was analyzed as previously described(51 (link)) using optimal reference normalization(52 (link)) and circular binary(53 (link),54 (link)) segmentation with Genotyping Console (Affymetrix) and dCHIP (build Apr 2010)(55 (link)). Detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and allelic ratios were performed using Nexus 7.5.2 software (BioDiscovery Inc, Hawthorne, CA, USA). All segments were manually curated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genome-Wide Chromothripsis Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (122 unpaired and 15 paired tumor/germline samples) were
genotyped using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. CEL files were generated using GeneChip
Command Console Software. SNP calls were generated using Genotyping Console
(Affymetrix) and the Birdseed v2 algorithm with default parameters. Array
normalization and copy number inference were performed according to a previously
published workflow74 (link).
Normalized data were viewed in dChip75 (link) and regions with abnormal copy number identified
computationally by circular binary segmentation (CBS)76 (link) and analyzed as previously
described.74 (link) Evidence
of chromothripsis was defined as the presence of at least ten changes in
segmental copy number between two or three copy number states on an individual
chromosome.24 (link) Inferred
copy number log2 data from chromosomes with chromothripsis were exported from
dChip and visualized in USCS Genome Browser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Profiling Copy Number Variations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy number variation (CNV) analysis was carried out on Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays (n = 10) and CytoScan HD arrays (n = 4; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Further details are given in the supplementary information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!