The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dako automated link 48 platform

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Dako Automated Link 48 platform is a laboratory automation system designed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) sample processing. The system provides automated slide-handling, reagent delivery, and incubation capabilities to streamline sample preparation workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using dako automated link 48 platform

1

EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma: Smoking and PD-L1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We consecutively collected 54 patients with pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of lung and activating EGFR mutation at diagnosis between January 2016 and December 2017 from Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, St. Paul’s Hospital, and Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Korea. Based on pack-year (PY) defined as average number of cigarettes per day/20× years of smoking, patients were categorized as never smokers (<100 cigarettes in their life-time), light smokers (0< PY <30), or heavy smokers (PY ≥30). Genotying of EGFR was done using peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method such as PNAClamp TM EGFR Mutation Detection Kit (PANAGENE, Inc., Daejeon, Korea) using real-time PCR. Activating EGFR mutation was defined as exon 19 deletion or exon 21 point mutation. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing was performing using PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako automated Link 48 platform (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA). PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was calculated as the percentage of at least 100 viable tumor cells with complete or partial membrane staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized PD-L1 IHC Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing was performed using the PD‐L1 clone 22C3, and the pharmDx kit, and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Dako). PD‐L1 expression measured as TPS was calculated as the percentage of positive cells in at least 100 viable tumor cells with complete or partial membrane staining assessed by four experienced pathologists (LL, MB, MAB, and GGR).
22 In instances of discrepancy, a consensus meeting involving a fifth senior pathologist was convened to reach an agreement, and the kappa coefficient was used. A PD‐L1 TPS <1% was defined as negative, and a PD‐L1 TPS ≥1% was considered positive. Additionally, PD‐L1 positive samples were stratified as low PD‐L1 expression (PD‐L1 TPS 1%–49%) and high PD‐L1 expression (PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing PD-L1 Expression in NSCLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each tumor sample, the histological subtype of carcinomatous components (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma) and sarcomatoid components were collected.
To measure the PD-L1 expression, we used the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Dako, Carpenteria, USA), which is clinically used for the evaluation of the PD-L1 expression in NSCLC at our institution. The PD-L1 expression was calculated as the percentage of complete or partial membrane staining in a section that included at least 100 viable tumor cells. Necrotic areas were excluded from scoring. A high expression of PD-L1 was defined as ≥50% staining of tumor cell membrane, and PD-L1 negative was defined as <1% staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Scoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All viable cancer cells on the entire pathologic tissue section were evaluated and included in the PD-L1 scoring analysis.
Programmed death-ligand 1 IHC testing was performed using the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was calculated as the percentage of the at least 100 viable cancer cells with complete or partial membrane staining. Necrotic areas were excluded from scoring. Each patient sample was separated into 3 groups with <1% (no expression), 1% to 49% (low expression), or ⩾50% (high expression) positive tumor cells. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression positivity is defined as low and high expression on the basis of the clinical trial assay that may maximally predict the clinical response of patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab.1 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating PD-L1 Expression in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We evaluated all viable cancer cells in the entire pathological tissue section of each tumor sample. The PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) were used to examine the PD-L1 expression. We calculated the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) as the percentage of complete or partial membrane staining in a sample. The cut-off values for the expression of PD-L1 were set at 50 and 1% based on a previous clinical study. We categorized the tumor samples of each patient into 3 groups (< 1% [negative], 1–49% [low expression], and ≥ 50% [high expression]) based on the presence of positively stained cells in specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PD-L1 Expression and EGFR Mutation in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All viable cancer cells on the entire pathological tissue section of each tumor sample were evaluated. We used the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) to measure the PD-L1 expression. The PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was calculated as the percentage of complete or partial membrane staining in a sample. The cut-off value for the expression of PD-L1 was set at 50% and 1% based on a previous clinical trial23 (link). The tumor samples of each patient were separated into 3 groups based on the presence of positivity stained cells in specimen, as follows: < 1% (negative), 1–49% (low expression), and ≥ 50% (high expression). All patients were subjected to an EGFR mutation assay by the testing laboratories (Cobas EGFR Mutation Test; Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PD-L1 Expression Analysis in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression was assessed in FFPE tumor tissues using the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) in 414 patients and using the SP263 pharmDx kit and Ventana Bench-Mark XT automated staining platform (Ventana Automated Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, United States) in 74 patients. The methodology for PD-L1 tests was performed according to standard protocols. Positive PD-L1 expression was identified using a cut-off of greater than 1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!