The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Securityguard guard column

Manufactured by Phenomenex
Sourced in United States

The SecurityGuard guard column is designed to protect analytical columns by intercepting and retaining contaminants before they reach the analytical column. It is a simple and effective way to extend the lifetime of analytical columns and improve the reliability of analytical results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using securityguard guard column

1

HPLC-FLD Analysis of Alternariol with Mg2+

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The integrated HPLC system (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) used contained an autosampler (AS-4050), a binary pump (PU-4180), and a fluorescence detector (FP-920). Chromatographic data were evaluated employing ChromNAV2 software (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). The effects of Mg2+ on the sensitivity regarding the HPLC-FLD analyses of AOH were tested employing the following two methods. In the first HPLC method, a SecurityGuard guard column (C8, 4.0 × 3.0 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was linked to a Kinetex C8 (100 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) analytical column; while in the second method, a SecurityGuard guard column (C18, 4.0 × 3.0 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, US) was linked to a Gemini C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, US) chromatographic column. In both assays, the mobile phase consisted of HEPES buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and acetonitrile (70:30 v/v%), without or with MgCl2 (50 mM). The injected sample volumes were 20 μL, the analyses were carried out at 1.0 mL/min flow rate and room temperature. AOH was detected at 455 nm emission wavelength (λex = 345 nm). The linearity was tested between 0 and 1000 nM mycotoxin concentrations. LOD and LOQ values were determined as the lowest concentrations where signal-to-noise ratios were 3 and 10, respectively. Intra-day repeatability was tested only for the Mg2+-sensitized methods (n = 7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Paracetamol Metabolites in Urine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical analysis of total urinary paracetamol and p-aminophenol was performed at the Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY. Specifically, 300 µL of 1 M ammonium acetate containing 30 U of β-glucuronidase (pH=5.5) was added to 500 µL of urine sample, followed by incubation at 37°C for 12 h. Target analytes were extracted thrice with ethyl acetate and were quantified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Acquity I Class; Waters, Milford, MA) coupled with an electrospray triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (API 5500; AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA) (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS). Separation of target analytes was carried by a Kinetex C18 (1.3 µ, 100A, 50 × 2.1 mm) column (Phenomenex; Torrance, CA) with a SecurityGuard guard column (Phenomenex) with positive ionization, multiple reaction monitoring mode of detection. Quality assurance and quality control parameters included procedural blanks, matrix spikes and duplicate analysis of samples. Labelled internal standards (d7-p-aminophenol and 13C2-15N- paracetamol) were spiked into all samples and quantification was by isotope dilution. The method limits of quantitation (LOQ) for p-aminophenol and paracetamol were 0.25 and 0.5 ng/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Fipronil Sulfone in Rat Urine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Method 2 is an alternative method for fipronil sulfone quantification and for independent evaluation of the accuracy of method 1. Analysis was carried out with a method reported by McMahen et al. (2015) (link). Briefly, rat urine (100μL) was precipitated with 900 μL of cold acetonitrile and centrifuged for 8 min at 12,500 ×g. An aliquot of the supernatant was extracted and mixed 50:50 with 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer before LC/MS analysis. Quantification analysis (LC/triple-quad) was carried out using an Agilent 1100 HPLC interfaced with a Sciex 3000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex) fitted with an ESI operated in the negative ionization mode. Fipronil sulfone specific transitions used for quantification were 451.1/415, 451.1/281.9, 451.1/243.9. The HPLC system consisted of a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (50 × 3 mm, 5 μm; Torrance, CA, USA) with a Security-guard guard column (Phenomenex). The method consisted of the following: 0.4 mL/min flow rate which increased to 0.75 mL/min at time = 2 min; temperature: 30 °C; mobile phases — A: ammonium acetate buffer (0.2 mM) and DI water:methanol (95:5, v/v), and B: ammonium acetate buffer (0.2 mM) and acetonitrile:DI water (95:5, v/v); gradient: 0–2 min 50% A and 50% B; 2.1–4 min, a linear gradient from 50:50 A:B to 10:90 A:B; 4–6 min 10% A and 90% B; 6.1–10 min re-equilibration to 50% A and 50% B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Pharmaceutical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analysed using an Agilent 1100 Series G1311A quaternary pump (Hewlett Packard, Santa Clara, CA, US) (flow rate = 1.2 mL/min) with a G1315B Diode Array Detector set at 220 nm. The stationary phase was a Shiseido Capcell Pak C 18 5 µm column (250 x 4.6 mm) (Tokyo, Japan) attached to a SecurityGuard ™ guard column with a C 18 cartridge (Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK). The mobile phase consists of 80% methanol, 20% water and 0.1% TFA. Samples were injected via a 25 µL loop and the retention time was 5.8 min. Calibration curves were developed based on the concentration calculated from the AUC. This HPLC method was validated according to ICH guideline Q2(R1) 30 . The limits of detection and quantification were 0.1 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!