The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

55 protocols using revolution evo

1

Multimodal Chest CT Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT images were acquired using one of the nine different systems (Sensation 64, Somatom Definition Flash, Somatom Force, Somatom Definition AS+; Siemens Healthineers; Discovery CT750 HD, Revolution EVO, Revolution CT, LightSpeed VCT: GE Healthcare, and iCT 256, Philips Healthcare). Images were obtained by modulating the tube voltage (usually at 120 kVp) and current (standard mAs and low mAs), leading to two different categories of radiation doses: standard and low dose. In addition, the slice thickness (thin sections [1 or 1.25 mm], medium sections [2 or 3 mm], and thick sections [5 mm]) and image reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction) varied. Detailed imaging parameters and their modulations are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Non-contrast cardiac CT for calcium scoring was acquired using one of eight different systems (Somatom Definition Flash, Somatom Force, Somatom Definition AS+; Siemens Healthineers; Revolution EVO, Revolution CT, LightSpeed VCT; GE Healthcare; iCT 256: Philips Healthcare; and Aquilion ONE: Toshiba). Detailed imaging parameters and their modulations are presented in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CT-Guided Lung and Bone Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Procedures were performed under CT guidance on a 16-section multidetector CT (LightSpeed 16; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) or 128-section multidetector CT (Revolution Evo; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an 18-gauge core biopsy needle (ProMag; Argon Medical Devices Inc., Athens, TX, USA and Bard Magnum; Bard, Covington, GA, USA) without a coaxial approach for lung target and Bonopty 12-gauge coaxial biopsy system (Apriomed; Londonbery, NH, USA) for bone target.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CT Imaging Protocol for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed either with a 16-slice GE Optima CT520 (300 patients) or a 128-slice GE Revolution EVO (105 patients).
The scanning parameters were as follows: Tube voltage, 100 kV if bodyweight ≤80 kg and 120 kV for patients >80 kg; tube current, 70-120 mAs with automatic dose modulation, and slice thickness of 1.25 mm. The radiation dose of chest CT was as follows: Volume CT dose index, 3.45-5.60 mGy; effective dose, 1.4-2.7 mSv if bodyweight ≤80 kg or >80 kg, respectively.
Images were obtained with mediastinal (width, 400 HU; level, 40 HU) and parenchymal (width, 1600 HU; level, −450 HU) window settings. After imaging in the axial plane, coronal and sagittal plans were created by performing multiplanar reconstruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Bone Density Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
QCT values were measured on a CT scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, USA, Revolution EVO). The calibration phantom consisted of K2HPO4 and was placed under the patient. Bone density was determined using bone mineral densitometry software (QCT-Pro™, version 3.1, Mindways Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Abdominal Aortic Calcification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aortic calcification index (ACI) was examined as a clinical indicator of abdominal aortic calcification. ACI was quantitatively measured using abdominal CT images (Revolution EVO; GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) by evaluating 10 slices of the aorta scanned at 10-mm intervals above the bifurcation of the common iliac arteries as previously described [18 (link)]. Each slice was divided into 12 sectors, and the numbers of sectors with calcification were counted. For example, if 8 out of 12 sectors were calcified in slice 1, this was scored as 8/12=66.7% (Fig. 2). The ACI (%) was calculated by averaging the percentage of calcification-positive sectors in slices 1–10. ACI was measured by a single investigator in a blinded manner. All abdominal CT examinations were performed as an annual routine screening for renal cell carcinoma within 6 months before or after evaluating the SHIM score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

COVID-19 Chest CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT studies were performed using a variety of vendors and systems: SOMATOM Definition AS (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany [n = 50]); SOMATOM Edge Plus (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany [n = 35]); SOMATOM Perspective (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany [n = 2]); LightSpeed VCT (GE Healthcare, Chicago, United States [n = 33]); Revolution HD (GE Healthcare, Chicago, United States [n = 13]); Revolution EVO (GE Healthcare, Chicago, United States [n = 6]); and Aquilion Prime (Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan [n = 13]). A non-contrast chest CT was performed on patients with COVID-19 symptoms to evaluate for potential pneumonia lesions (n = 46), and a chest CT angiogram with iodine contrast [100–200 mL of Iopamidol (Isovue, Bracco Diagnostics), depending on patient's weight, administered by bolus injection] was performed in patients in whom pulmonary embolic disease was suspected (n = 106). CT acquisition parameters are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CT Phantom Imaging Protocol for Craniectomy Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phantoms were scanned on a 128-slice CT scanner (Revolution EVO; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) in helical mode under the head CT protocol using 110 kVp and variable effective mAs (Fig. 2). Advantage workstation (AW)® version 4.7 was used for post-processing of data. Then, 1.25-mm thin reconstructions were generated in both the soft tissue window and bone window. The phantom was placed on the CT scan gantry in vertical and horizontal positions (Fig. 2A,B). Craniectomies of different sizes and shapes were marked on the walls of the phantom by drilling holes. Various measurements were done on the phantom by measuring tapes (Fig. 2C). The holes were plugged by radiocontrast containing putty for better visualization on the CT scan (Fig. 2D). Two spherical sacs of stretchable materials were subsequently placed inside the phantom through two holes (Fig. 2D). The sacs were fixed to three-way connectors and filled with water until they expanded to occupy nearly the entire space available, barring entrapped air (Fig. 2E). Studies were repeated with a single sac and with different working volumes (Fig. 2F). To calculate all the measurements and volume, AW volume share 7® software was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive CT Imaging Evaluation of Pneumoconiosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The imaging techniques used in the study included chest CT scans obtained without contrast in the supine position, in deep inspiration, using 16-detector (Toshiba aquilion), 64-detector (Philips, Brilliance, Netherlands), or 128-detector CT (GE Revolution EVO, USA). All images were processed with standard mediastinal and lung window settings, and axial, coronal, sagittal reformat images were structured with the 3D Slicer program. 3D volumetric images and minimum intensity projection (MinIP) images showing trachea, main bronchi, lobar and segmental bronchial branches were obtained from these images. The scanning parameters were; rotation time: 0.5-0.6 s., 120 kV, 50-500 mA, section thickness: 1.25 mm, section interval: 1.25 mm, pitch: 1.375-1.388.
CT images of the patient and control groups were evaluated again to note the TBV at three different times and were recorded by a radiologist with eight years of experience in thoracic radiology. CXRs of pneumoconiosis cases were classified according to the International Labour Organization (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses12 by an occupational diseases specialist who is a certified reader of pneumoconiosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CT Scanning of Swine Breeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Landrace and Duroc boars were scanned in a 32-slice CT-scanner (LightSpeed Pro32, GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and Synthetic A and B boars were scanned in a 64-slice CT-scanner (Revolution Evo, GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, USA). The scanning procedure has been described before [13 (link)], but briefly: boars were sedated and placed in sternal recumbency with free limb position. The field of view was collimated from the snout to whichever was most caudal of the tail or hocks of the pig, and scan parameters were 120 kV, dynamic mA up to 400, slice thickness of 1.25 mm and pitch 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiphasic CT Angiography for Lesion Vascularity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed using a 64 × 2 MDCT scanner (Revolution EVO, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), as a standard protocol with multiphasic acquisition using the following parameters: collimation thickness 0.625 mm, layer thickness 2.5 mm, tube current 630 mA, rotation speed 0.5 s. In order to determine the vascularity of the lesions, a baseline scan was performed before contrast injection and three post-contrast acquisition were obtained after intravenous injection of iodinate contrast medium (Iomeron 400, Bracco, Milan, Italy) at standard dose of 1.5 mL/kg with a flow rate of 3.5 mL/s. The only venous phase was acquired in spectral imaging modality, with single-tube rapid oscillation kVp technology, in order to reduce radiation exposure and guarantee high images quality (Gemston Spectral Imaging, GSI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA).
The absorbed dose from spectral imaging was recorded for each patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!