The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Incapacitance meter

Manufactured by Columbus Instruments

The Incapacitance meter is a device used to measure the electrical capacitance of a circuit or component. It provides a quantitative measurement of the ability of a circuit to store electrical charge.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using incapacitance meter

1

Detailed Preclinical Behavioral Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical sensitivity was assessed using an electronic von Frey aesthesiometer (IITC Inc., Woodland Hills, CA). Thermal sensitivity was assessed using a Hargreaves apparatus (Ugo Basile Plantar Test, Model 7371, Collegeville, PA). Hindpaw weight-bearing was measured using an incapacitance meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Horizontal locomotor activity was measured using a photobeam apparatus (Opto-varimex, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH): 15 photobeams cross the width of a 20 x 40 x 23-cm clear plastic rodent cage, with photobeams spaced 2.5 cm apart and 6.5 cm high. Paw edema was quantified by measuring maximal dorsal-ventral hindpaw thickness with calipers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Incapacitance Meter Assessment of Arthritic Pain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the effect of IA ProGel-Dex treatment on amelioration of arthritic joint pain, the static weight distribution between the hind limbs of rats and mice was measured using an incapacitance meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH), which consists of two force transducers capable of measuring the body weight that the animal places on each hind limb. Animals were placed on the apparatus with their hind paws centered on the two force transducers, and the average body weight distribution in grams was recorded. The weight-bearing score was expressed as a ratio of the weight placed through the ipsilateral limb versus the sum of the weights placed through both the contralateral and ipsilateral limbs, with a ratio of 50% resulting from equal weight distribution across both hind limbs. Weight distribution was measured before model establishment, before drug administration, and daily after the initiation of the treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Knee Joint Pain Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 31 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into four groups: Group 1 - control naïve group (n = 6); Group 2- sham group (n = 7); Group 3- ACLT group (n = 10) and Group 4- osteochondral injury group (n = 8). The pain assessment was carried out weekly for up to eight weeks after operation using the hind limb weight-bearing test (Incapacitance meter; Columbus Instruments International, Columbus, Ohio). This technique measures the difference in weight bearing between the operated and non-operated contralateral limbs. Changes in the hind limb weight distribution (%HLWD) on the operated hind limb were used to determine the degree of knee joint pain. The %HLWD was determined as described previously.22 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Pain Assessment in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical sensitivity was assessed using an electronic von Frey aesthesiometer (IITC Inc., Woodland Hills, CA). Thermal sensitivity was assessed using a Hargreaves apparatus (Ugo Basile Plantar Test, Model 7371, Collegeville, PA). Hindpaw weight-bearing was measured using an incapacitance meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Horizontal locomotor activity (a measure of pain suppressed behavior and drug-induced sedation) was measured using a photobeam apparatus (Opto-varimex, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH): 15 photobeams cross the width of a 20 × 40 × 23-cm clear plastic rodent cage, with photobeams spaced 2.5 cm apart and 6.5 cm high. Paw edema was quantified by measuring maximal dorsal-ventral hindpaw thickness with calipers. Open field measurements (to assess anxiety-like behavior) were taken in a 79-cm2 clear plexiglass box with 47-cm high walls and a dark floor that was marked into 16 equal squares (4 inner squares and 12 outer squares, each 19.75 cm2). Activity in the open field was recorded using a video camera mounted approximately 1.3 m above the open field floor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!