The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

41 protocols using plan apochromat oil objective

1

Detailed imaging protocol for microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed samples were mounted on glass coverslips using Fluoromount-G and imaged using a confocal, widefield, or high-resolution Airyscan confocal microscopy as indicated in the figure legends. Widefield images were acquired using an Olympus IX-83 microscope using UPlanSAPO 40× silicon oil (NA 1.25; Fig. 2 A and Fig. S4 B) or PlanApo N 60× TIRF microscope objective (oil, NA 1.45; Fig. S2 C). Confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope with 63× Plan Apochromat oil objective (NA 1.4; Fig. 1 A and Fig. S1, D and E), Zeiss LSM 710 META with 63× Alpha Plan Apochromat oil objective (NA 1.46; Fig. 3, D and F), or Zeiss LSM880 Axio Observer with 63× Plan Apochromat oil objective (NA 1.4; Fig. 2 F and Fig. S2, A, B, D, and E). Airyscan confocal imaging was performed using Zeiss LSM 880 AxioObserver confocal microscope with Airyscan detector and 63× Plan Apochromat oil objective (NA 1.4). Images were acquired in superresolution scan mode (Fig. 1, B and E; and Fig. 5, A and B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Microscopy for Spindle Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluoresence images for the AURKA experiments were acquired using a spinning-disk confocal system (Marianas, Intelligent Imaging Innovation, 3i) built on an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Zeiss) with an ORCA-Flash 4.0 camera (Hamamatsu Photonics). Images were taken with a 63× 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective (ZEISS). The spindle size was measured using the CEP135 signal in the Slidebook software (Marianas, Intelligent Imaging Innovation, 3i, V5.5 or later).
Experiments assessing the localization of the GFP transgenes were all performed on live cells with the exception of the AURKB and CHMP4B transgenes. Live cells were imaged in CO2-independent visualization media (Gibco). Images were acquired using a DeltaVision imaging system (GE Healthcare) with an sCMOS camera (PCO Edge 5.5) and a 60× 1.42NA Plan Apo N UIS2 objective (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Autophagy and Lysosomal Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For autophagosome–lysosome fusion assessments, U2OS cells were transfected with GFP-mCherry-LC3 for 24 h, treated with EBSS for 2 h before fixation with 4% paraformaldeyde in PBS, and imaged using a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope in Airyscan mode equipped with a 63 × 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective (Carl Zeiss). A z-projection was performed using maximum projection before quantification. The mCherry-positive vesicles indicate autophagosomes already fused with lysosomes, as the GFP signal would be quenched by the acidic environment of lysosomes; vesicles with both GFP and mCherry fluorescence indicate autophagosomes not yet fused with lysosomes. Quantifications of these two types of vesicles were performed manually using Fiji software.
For lysosome acidification assays, U2OS cells were labeled with 1 μM LysoSensor Green DND 189 for 4 min and immediately imaged within one minute with a Zeiss Axio microscope using a 20×/0.4 NA objective. Images were captured with ZEN software, and total intensities of each cell were quantified in Fiji.
Cathepsin L activity assays were carried out using the Abcam Cathepsin L Activity Assay kit (Fluorometric; ab65306) following the manufacturer’s instructions; 1 × 106 cells were assayed in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Time-lapse Epifluorescence Imaging for Live-Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Time-lapse epifluorescence imaging was performed using a Axiovert 200M microscope or an Axioobserver Z1 (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a temperature-controlled carbon dioxide incubation chamber set to 37°C, 65% humidity, and 5% CO2. Single focal planes were acquired with a 40× phase-contrast objective (Carl Zeiss). For high-resolution epifluorescent live-cell recordings 100×/1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective (Carl Zeiss) was used with a z-stack resolution of 0.267 µm in fast acquisition mode. Illumination was provided by an X-Cite lamp (series 120; Lumen Dynamics Group) and images were recorded by a Coolsnap HQ camera (Photometrics). Sequential images were acquired using MetaMorph software every 3 to 4 min after addition of the stimulus.
For confocal time-lapse recordings (Video 2), a Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus) equipped with an Argon ion laser (Melles Griot) and a temperature-controlled CO2 incubation chamber (EMBL) at 37°C was used. Either a 60×/1.2 NA water UPlanSApo or a 60×/1.35 NA oil UPlasSApo objective (Olympus) was used. Images were recorded using Fluoview v. 4.0b (Olympus) software.
Fixed samples were imaged with either a confocal SP2 (Leica) using Leica software or the epifluorescent microscopes Axiovert 200M or Axio Observer Z1 using MetaMorph software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing E. faecalis Infection in RAW264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 cells were seeded at 2 × 105 cells per well in a 24-well plate with 10-mm coverslips and allowed to attach overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Infection with Syto9 fluorescent-labeled E. faecalis V583 was performed with MOI of 10 for 1 hour. The coverslips seeded with cells were then fixed with 4% PFA at 4°C for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature, and washed thrice in PBS. Cells were then blocked with PBS supplemented with 0.1% saponin and 2% BSA. For actin labeling, the phalloidin–Alexa Fluor 555 conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was diluted 1:40 in PBS and incubated for 1 hour. Coverslips were then washed three times in PBS with 0.1% saponin. They were then subjected to a final wash with PBS, thrice. Last, the coverslips were mounted with SlowFade Diamond Antifade (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sealed. Confocal images were then acquired on a 63×/numerical aperture (NA) 1.4, Plan Apochromat oil objective fitted onto Elyra PS.1 with LSM 780 confocal unit (Carl Zeiss) using the Zeiss Zen Black 2012 FP2 software suite. Laser power and gain were kept constant between experiments. Z-stacked images were processed using Zen 2.1 (Carl Zeiss). Acquired images were visually analyzed using ImageJ (52 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Imaging of Infected Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infected macrophages, following 1 or 24 hr of infection were washed with PBS, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, washed once with PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. Nucleic acids were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1 μg/mL DAPI, Sigma) and the cells were washed three times with PBS. The slides were observed using an inverted Zeiss LSM 880 Axio-observer Z1 confocal laser scanning microscope with Airyscan detector. Cells were visualized using Zeiss Plan-Apochromat oil objective lens of X 63 and numerical aperture of 1.4. Z-stacked images were acquired with a digital zoom of X 5.58 (X 1.8 for broad fields), using the Zen lite software (Carl Zeiss microscopy). Images were processed using Image J software package. A single representative section of the compiled Z-projections produced by Image J software is presented in all the figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TIRFM images were acquired using an Olympus IX-71 microscope through TIRF illumination, recorded with a iXon EMCCD camera (Andor Technology), and a cellTIRF 4Line system (Olympus).
All widefield imaging was performed using an inverted microscope (IX83-ZDC2; Evident/Olympus) equipped with a cMOS camera (Orca-Fusion, Hamamatsu) and Xenon light source Images were acquired using a 100× 1.50 NA TIRF objective (Olympus) and with Cellsens software (Evident/Olympus).
Confocal microscopy was performed on an inverted laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM980, Zeiss) with a motorized X,Y stage and Z focus with high speed Piezo insert. The microscope is equipped with 4 diode lasers (405, 488, 561, 633). Images were acquired with 1x Nyquist sampling using a 63× 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective (Zeiss) and 4 channel GaAsP detectors on Zen Blue 3.6 software. This microscope is equipped with Airyscan 2, however, this module was not used in these experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live-cell Imaging of Mitotic Progression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded into chambered cover glasses (LabTEK: Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the lids of the chambers were sealed with baysilone paste (Neolab). Approximately 30 min before imaging, culture medium was exchanged to prewarmed CO2-independent medium without phenol red, containing 20% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, and 100 mg/ml penicillin–streptomycin. Live cell microscopy was performed in 37°C microscope incubators (EMBL GP106) on a Zeiss 780 confocal microscope with a 63× PlanApochromat oil objective (NA 1.4, Carl Zeiss) and in-house temperature controller, controlled by the Zen 2010 Software. Six z stacks with 2.00-μm intervals were used for each position. Images were acquired with 5-min time resolution. When applicable, automated quantitative analysis of cells was pursued to monitor for mitotic progression in single cells. To this end, nuclei were detected in the H2B-mCherry channel and classified as previously described (Held et al, 2010 (link); Walter et al, 2010 (link)) with an overall accuracy of > 90.0%. Cells were tracked with a constrained nearest-neighbor tracking procedure, and mitotic onset was detected as interphase–prophase or interphase–prometaphase transition. To reduce the effect of classification errors on phase length measurements, classification results were corrected using hidden Markov models (Held et al, 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Widefield and Confocal Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All widefield imaging was performed using an inverted microscope (IX83-ZDC2; Evident/Olympus) equipped with a cMOS camera (Orca-Fusion, Hamamatsu) and Xenon light source. Images were acquired using a 100× 1.59 NA TIRF objective (Olympus) and with Cellsens software (Evident/Olympus).
Confocal microscopy was performed on an inverted laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM780 or 980, Zeiss). The LSM780 was equipped with a motorized X,Y stage, Z-focus, five lasers (405, 488, 561, 594, 633), and three fluorescence detectors (two flanking PMTs and a central 34 channel GaGasp with ~40% QE). Images were acquired with a 63x Plan-Apochromat oil objective (NA=1.4) using ZEN Black v 2.3. The LSM980 is equipped with a motorized X,Y stage and Z focus with high speed Piezo insert as well as four diode lasers (405, 488, 561, 633). Images were acquired with 1x Nyquist sampling using a 63× 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective (Zeiss) and 4 channel GaAsP detectors on Zen Blue 3.6 software. This microscope is equipped with Airyscan 2, however, this module was not used in these experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FRAP measurements were performed
on a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope equipped with a 63× (NA
= 1.4) Plan-Apochromat oil objective (Carl Zeiss AG, Germany). The
dsGUVs were sealed within a BSA-coated observation chamber and placed
in a thermostatic chamber at 25 °C. Two circular areas of 2.5
μm radius were defined as the probed area at the bottom of each
dsGUVs determinated by z-stack profiling beforehand:
(1) as bleaching spot and (2) as reference spot (unbleached) for data
correction. Using bleaching, experimental regions, and time series
options in Zeiss Zen software (Zen v2.3), 10 images (laser power,
1.0%) were recorded prior to bleaching (100 iteration; laser intensity,
100%) and 100 images after bleaching (laser intensity, 1.0%) as depicted
in Figure 1B. A 561
nm laser (excitation of Liss Rhod B) was used for the FRAP measurements,
with a pinhole aperture set to one Airy Unit. The 247 × 247 pixels
images were recorded with an integration of 71.85 ms per image. The
diffusion coefficient was extracted from the acquired images using
an adapted MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc.) code as described previously,3 (link) where a nonlinear least-square fit was applied
to the normalized fluorescence intensity from the recovery phase.
Details are presented in the Supporting Information note 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!