The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Shim pack uflc

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in United States, Japan

The Shim-pack UFLC is an ultra-fast liquid chromatography system developed by Shimadzu. It is designed to provide high-speed and efficient separation of a wide range of compounds. The system features a compact design and advanced technologies to optimize performance and throughput.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using shim pack uflc

1

Metabolite Profiling of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The freeze-dried fronds were grounded with zirconia beads by a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch) at 30 Hz for 1.5 min. The powder (100 mg) was weighed and dissolved with 1.0 mL 70% methanol and extracted at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min, the sample extracts (supernatant) were collected and filtered by 0.22 μm pore size millipore filters, and then analyzed by an LC-MS/MS system (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, MS/MS Applied Biosystems 6500 QTRAP). Metabolites were identified by comparing the m/z values, the retention time (RT), and the fragmentation patterns with the standards in the database, and metabolites quantitate analysis was performed by MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) (Dong et al., 2019 (link)). QC samples were exported to analyze the sample repeatability under the same treatment. According to the result of OPLS-DA, the VIP (variable importance in the project) score was used to screen the significantly changed metabolites (SCMs). Differential metabolites with VIP ≥ 1, fold change ≥ 2, and fold change ≤ 0.5 were filtered as significantly changed metabolites. The MRM was carried out by Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolomic Profiling of Breast Cancer Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample extracts were analyzed using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, https://www.shimadzu.com/) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS, QTRAP, https://sciex.com/) systems. Briefly, cell samples (107 cells per sample), supernatant samples (50 µl per sample), and breast cancer tissue samples (25 mg per sample) were thawed on ice and then mixed with 1000 µl of extract solution. Metabolite extraction, LC–MS/MS analysis, compound identification and quantification, and differential metabolite analysis were performed as reported previously.16 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Flavonoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPLC–ESI–MS/MS system equipped with the WatersACQUITY (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) column was applied to analyze the extracts (UPLC, Shim–pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system, Shimadzu; MS, Applied Biosystems 6500 Triple Quad–rupole, Sciex, ON, Canada). The mobile phase consisted of water and methanol with 0.1% formic acid in both solutions, and the elution was carried out following the gradient program with an injection volume of 2 μL, initially eluted in a volume ratio of 95:5, followed by 50:50 at 6 min, then 5:95 at 12 min for 2 min, finally 95:5 at 14 min, holding for 2 min. The flow rate of the moving phase was fixed at 0.35 mL/min and the column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. The detection and quantification of effluent were performed on ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)–MS (San Diego, CA, USA) and the operating parameters were provided in Table S5. The metabolites of anthocyanidin eluted within the period were quantified by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM). Flavonoid contents were detected by MetWare (http://www.metware.cn/ accessed on 4 November 2021, Wuhan, China) based on HPLC and the ESI–Q TRAPMS/MS platform [59 (link)]. The detailed information of standard analysis and the chromatograms of the flavonoid compounds are provided in Table S6 and Figure S2, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomics Analysis of Tuber Flesh

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tubers sliced to 1 mm thickness was crushed using a mixer mill (MM400, Retsch) with a zirconia bead for 1.5 min at 30 Hz. 100 mg flesh powder was extracted overnight at 4 °C with 1.0 ml 70% aqueous methanol. The sample extracts were analyzed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (HPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, MS, Applied Biosystems 6500 Q TRAP). The metabolomics approach was according to Yan et al. [67 (link)] with some modification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomic and Lipidomic Analysis of Plant Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sample treatment and collection, a widely targeted metabolomics analysis was conducted at MetWare Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Wuhan, China) on the basis of a previously described method [12 ]. In brief, samples were ground into powder and then 100 mg powder was extracted in 1.0 mL of 70% aqueous methanol overnight at 4°C. Next, the extract was absorbed and filtered for further analysis using a UPLC–ESI–MS/MS system. This system was a combination of UPLC (Shim-pack UFLC, Shimadzu CBM30A system) and MS (Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP). The conditions for the UPLC and MS were as described previously [12 ]. The MetWare database (MWDB) was used to identify the metabolites. The abundance of metabolites was calculated based on their peak areas. Metabolites with change in relative abundance >2-fold between −Pi and +Pi treatments, as well as variable importance in project (VIP) >1.0, were defined as DAMs. Lipidomic analysis was conducted at MetWare Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Wuhan, China) according to previously described methods [48 ].
Targeted determination of ATP, ADP, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), fructose 6-phosphate (F6P), and glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) using an LC–MS/MS system was performed at Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China) based on published methods [49 (link)]. Each treatment in this experiment had five biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Serum Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the LC-MS/MS analysis, 1 volume of the thawed serum sample was mixed with 3 volumes of ice-cold methanol. The mixture was whirled and centrifuged twice, and the supernatant was obtained. The UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM A, Shimadzu Company, Japan; MS, QTRAP®, SCIEX Company, USA) was employed. The analytical conditions were as follows: column temperature, 40 °C; flow rate, 0.4 mL/min; injection volume, 2 μL; solvent system, water (containing 0.04% acetic acid) and acetonitrile (containing 0.04% acetic acid); gradient program, 95:5 v/v at 0 min, 5:95 v/v at 11.0 min, 5:95 v/v at 12.0 min, 95:5 v/v at 12.1 min, and 95:5 v/v at 14.0 min. The metabolites were identified based on the standard data of Metware (Wuhan, China) and quantified according to their peak area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolomics Analysis of Sample Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample preparation and metabolomics analysis were performed as previously described49 (link)–51 (link). The sample extracts were analyzed by an LC–ESI–MS/MS system (HPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system, and MS, Applied Biosystems 6500 Q TRAP). The analytical conditions were performed according to Wang et al. (2018)50 ,51 (link). LIT (linear ion trap) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were captured via triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Q TRAP), API 6500 Q TRAP LC/MS/MS System. The mass spectrometry conditions were performed according to Wang et al. (2018)50 ,51 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

LC-ESI-MS/MS Metabolite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample extracts were analysed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC Shimadzu CBM A system, https://www.shimadzu.com/; MS, QTRAP® System, https://sciex.com/). Linear Ion Trap (LIT) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired on a QQQ-linear ion trap mass spectrometer QTRAP® LC-MS/MS system equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI). The turbo ion-spray interface operates in positive and negative ion mode and is controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: source temperature 500 °C; ion spray voltage (IS) 5500 V (positive), −4500 V (negative); ion source gas I (GSI), gas II (GSII), and curtain gas (CUR) pressure were set at 55, 60, and 25.0 psi, respectively; and the collision gas (CAD) was high. Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 µmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes. For each period, a specific set of MRM transitions were monitored depending on which metabolites eluted within this period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!