Log In Sign up
The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hd280 pro headphones

Manufactured by Sennheiser
Visit Supplier
Sourced in Germany

The Sennheiser HD280 Pro headphones are closed-back, circumaural studio headphones designed for professional audio monitoring and mixing. They feature a wide frequency response range, high sound isolation, and a foldable, compact design for easy portability.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

E prime software, by Psychology Software Tools (3 mentions) Type 4153, by Brüel & Kjær (2 mentions) Display system, by Cambridge Research Systems (1 mentions) Audiofile stimulus processor, by Cambridge Research Systems (1 mentions) Matlab, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Eyex eyetracking system, by Tobii (1 mentions) Matlab r2014a, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Matlab 2011b, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Eyex eye tracker, by Tobii (1 mentions) Audition, by Adobe (1 mentions)

22 protocols using hd280 pro headphones

1

Multimodal Cognitive Assessments Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Question-and-answer task stimuli were presented using DMDX software (Forster & Forster,
2003) on a Dell T7810 computer with Windows 7. Stimuli were presented
on a 30 cm × 53 cm monitor and binaurally through Sennheiser HD280pro
headphones. A response button-box interfaced with the DMDX program via a
parallel input/output card (Measurement Computing PCI-DIO24) to provide
millisecond accurate response timing. A laptop PC (Windows 7) was used to
administer the FrACT and LSPAN. For the LSPAN, sound was delivered binaurally
through Sennheiser HD280pro headphones.
Beadle J., Kim J, & Davis C. (2022). Visual Speech Improves Older and Younger Adults’ Response Time and Accuracy for Speech Comprehension in Noise. Trends in Hearing, 26, 23312165221145006.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Auditory Stimuli Generation and Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Auditory stimuli consisted of brief (16ms duration) bursts of white noise generated by a Xonar Essence STX (ASUS) soundcard (https://www.asus.com/us/Sound-Cards/Xonar_Essence_STX/) with a sampling rate of 44,100 Hz. Stimuli were delivered using Sennheiser HD 280 Pro Headphones at an SPL of 70 dB. Auditory stimuli for the second control experiment where auditory and visual stimuli arose from the same spatial location were delivered using a TEAC two-way speaker system (http://www.teac-audio.eu/en/products/ls-101hr-129505.html).
Motala A., Heron J., McGraw P.V., Roach N.W, & Whitaker D. (2018). Rate after-effects fail to transfer cross-modally: Evidence for distributed sensory timing mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 8, 924.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Sensory Perception Experiment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were generated using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) and Psychtoolbox extensions (Brainard, 1997 (link); Pelli, 1997 (link)). The visual stimulus was a stationary white circle with a diameter of 3.5° presented on a grey background in the center of the screen. Auditory stimuli were pure tones of 1000 Hz created in MATLAB and presented binaurally at 75 dB (measured at the auditory source) via Sennheiser HD 280 pro headphones laid flat, directly under the center of the display, with earpieces facing the ceiling to approximate the same spatial location as the visual signal. Visual and auditory stimuli were delivered through a Display ++ system with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and an AudioFile stimulus processor, respectively (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, UK). For all experiments, participants sat in front of the display 60 cm away from the screen.
Scurry A.N., Dutcher D., Werner J.S, & Jiang F. (2019). Age-Related Effects on Cross-Modal Duration Perception. Multisensory research, 32(8), 693-714.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Stimulus Presentation and Response Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presentation of stimuli and collection of responses was achieved using the EPrime software (Version 2.0, Psychology Software Tools Inc., Sharpsburg, US). Acoustic stimuli were presented over HD280pro headphones (Sennheiser, Wedemark, Germany) via a custom built digital-to-analogue converter. The presentation level of the acoustic stimuli was calibrated to achieve an average presentation level between 70 and 73 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Calibration was performed by coupling the headphones to an artificial ear (Brüel & Kjær Type 4153) using a flatplate adaptor. Calibration measurements were made using a 0.5-inch pressure field microphone (Type 4192) connected to a sound level meter (Type 2260). Visual stimuli were presented on a computer-controlled visual display unit measuring 25.4 cm high by 44.5 cm wide positioned approximately 0.5 m away from the participants and at head height.
Stacey P.C., Kitterick P.T., Morris S.D, & Sumner C.J. (2016). The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure. Hearing research, 336, 17-28.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Human Psychophysical Testing on Bird Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We also tested humans on the same stimuli used to test the birds and on a similar psychophysical procedure. Human subjects were recruited from staff and students in the lab and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants had no prior experiences with these stimuli. The human testing procedure was modeled after the procedure used with the birds. Subjects were stationed at the same computers which controlled the bird operant tasks, outfitted with Sennheiser HD280PRO headphones, and given a response panel with two keys. Subjects were told they would be listening to a repeating background sound, during which they should press the observation key to effect a change in the background and to press the report key whenever they heard a change. Subjects were tested on a subset of the stimulus sets: a single bird’s motif (motif 2) and a single speaker’s vowels (speaker 2). Humans ran for one 100-trial session on each task.
Fishbein A.R., Prior N.H., Brown J.A., Ball G.F, & Dooling R.J. (2021). Discrimination of natural acoustic variation in vocal signals. Scientific Reports, 11, 916.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Stimulus Presentation and Response Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presentation of stimuli and collection of responses was achieved using the EPrime software (Version 2.0, Psychology Software Tools Inc., Sharpsburg, US). Acoustic stimuli were presented over HD280pro headphones (Sennheiser, Wedemark, Germany) via a custom built digital-to-analogue converter. The presentation level of the acoustic stimuli was calibrated to achieve an average presentation level between 70 and 73 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Calibration was performed by coupling the headphones to an artificial ear (Brüel & Kjær Type 4153) using a flatplate adaptor. Calibration measurements were made using a 0.5-inch pressure field microphone (Type 4192) connected to a sound level meter (Type 2260). Visual stimuli were presented on a computer-controlled visual display unit measuring 25.4 cm high by 44.5 cm wide positioned approximately 0.5 m away from the participants and at head height.
Stacey P.C., Kitterick P.T., Morris S.D, & Sumner C.J. (2016). The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure. Hearing research, 336, 17-28.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Cognitive Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The four tasks were administered to each participant in the order in which they appear above. All tasks were administered in a dimly lit, quiet room. Visual stimuli were presented on a Dell 2407 WFP monitor at a viewing distance of approximately 57 cm. Auditory stimuli were presented binaurally through Sennheiser HD 280 Pro headphones. Consistent with previous work conducted by our labs, stimulus presentation and data collection were controlled by Superlab (Version 5; Cedrus) for the speech tasks and by Presentation (Version 21.0, Neurobehavioral Systems) for the non-speech tasks.
Schmidt S.A., Bieber D., Ramer S.W., Hwang J., Wu C.Y, & Schoolnik G. (2001). Structure-Function Analysis of BfpB, a Secretin-Like Protein Encoded by the Bundle-Forming-Pilus Operon of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 183(16), 4848-4859.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Auditory Perception Experimental Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Listeners were seated in front of a computer in a double-walled sound-attenuating booth while wearing Sennheiser HD280 Pro headphones. The stimuli were generated at a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz using a MATLAB program, delivered to a RME HDSP 9632 24-bit soundcard (ASIO), and presented through the left headphone.
Roverud E., Best V., Mason C.R., Swaminathan J, & Kidd G J.r. (2016). Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task. Trends in Hearing, 20, 2331216516638516.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Screening for Hearing Deficits in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 41 typically developing male school children participated in the study. On average, they were aged 6.3 years (standard deviation = 0.5 years, range: 5–7 years) at the start of the study, and had no history of cognitive, sensory or behavioral deficits, according to parental report. Parents of children in the participating schools received an information letter through the schoolteacher and agreed for their children to participate by providing written consent. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Pretoria Research Ethics Committee, Approval 25071999 (GW20171130HS).
Prior to participation, all children were screened for hearing deficits. Normal hearing function was established using the smartphone hearing-screening application hearScreenTM that detects hearing losses in excess of 20 dB Hearing Level at 1, 2, and 4 kHz with 97.8% reliability compared to standard manual audiometric procedures (Swanepoel et al., 2014 (link)). The application was run on Samsung Galaxy J2 mobile phones connected to Sennheiser HD280 Pro headphones.
MacCutcheon D., Füllgrabe C., Eccles R., van der Linde J., Panebianco C, & Ljung R. (2020). Investigating the Effect of One Year of Learning to Play a Musical Instrument on Speech-in-Noise Perception and Phonological Short-Term Memory in 5-to-7-Year-Old Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2865.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Perception of Spanish Vowels by Bilingual Listeners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were presented via Sennheiser HD 280 pro headphones. Listeners were presented with the carrier phrase with a nonsense word: “Five /gǝbVpǝ/ this time.” They were instructed to “listen to the second vowel sound of the word (e.g., gabeepa) and determine which Spanish sound is the best example of that sound by choosing one of the following Spanish nonsense words: bapo, bepo, bipo, bopo, bupo.” Response options were displayed on the computer monitor and represented the Spanish vowels /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, and /u/. Listeners then heard the stimulus again and were asked to rate the vowel on a scale from 1–9, with (1) indicating “least Spanish-like” and (9) indicating “most Spanish-like.” They were instructed to use the entire spectrum of the scale. A total of 7,128 responses were collected from 24 listeners (297 from each early and late bilingual listener).
Baigorri M., Campanelli L, & Levy E.S. (2018). Perception of American–English Vowels by Early and Late Spanish–English Bilinguals. Language and speech, 62(4), 681-700.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!