The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Odp 2

Manufactured by Gerstel
Sourced in Germany, United States

The ODP-2 is a thermal desorption system designed for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in various sample matrices. It provides automated thermal desorption and subsequent injection into a gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer (GC-MS) or other analytical instruments. The core function of the ODP-2 is to facilitate the sample preparation and introduction process for the analysis of VOCs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using odp 2

1

Aroma Profiling of Food Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aroma-active compounds in the samples and control were screened using GC-O identification with an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent 5973 N mass selection detector (Wilmington, DE, USA) and a sniffing port (ODP-2; Gerstel, Inc., Linthicum, MD, USA), based on the previous description of Gao et al., (2020) [3 (link)].
The flavor dilution factor (FD) represents the highest split ratio (most dilution) of GC injection at which the odorant could be noticed (even if not identified) by at least two out of three panelists [3 (link)]. In this study, the split ratios of GC injection were 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, 16:1, 32:1, 64:1, 128:1, 256:1 and 512:1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Aroma Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A GC (Agilent 6890, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), a mass selective detector (Agilent 5973 MSD) and a Gerstel ODP 2 (Linthicum, MD, USA) sniffing port using a deactivated capillary column (30 cm × 0.3 mm) heated at 240 °C and supplied with humidified air at 40 °C was used to analyze aroma and aroma-active compounds. Helium was used as a carrier gas with a flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1. Aroma compounds were separated on DB-Wax column (30 m length × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.5 μm thickness, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The program conditions were as follows: The oven start temperature was 50 °C (1 min), the subsequent gradient was 5 °C min−1 to 200 °C and then at a rate of 8 °C min−1 to 260 °C with a final hold at 260 °C for 5 min (DB-WAX column, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Afterwards, GC effluent was split 1:1:1 among the FID, MSD, and sniffing mode via a Dean’s switch. A total of 3 μL of extract was injected each time in pulsed splitless (40 psi; 0.5 min) mode. Mass spectra in the electron ionization mode were recorded at 70 eV and a mass/charge range of 30–300 amu at 2.0 scan s−1 scan rate. The identification of compounds was carried out using mass spectral database (NIST 98, Wiley 6), retention index, and chemical standards. Concentration of each compound was calculated using internal standard method [11 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purity Verification of Reference Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gas chromatography-olfactometry analysis was performed to ensure that the high-purity reference compounds did not contain any odorous impurities. Reference compounds were identified using an Agilent 7890 GC system in conjunction with an olfactory detection port (Gerstel ODP-2, Mulheim and der Ruhr, Germany). Reference compounds were separated with an HP-Innowax (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) fused quartz capillary column. The experimental procedures were the same as in our previous study (Tian et al., 2019) (link). Five panelists were randomly selected from the above-mentioned sensory panelists for this research. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The GC-olfactometry analysis found that none of the reference compounds purchased were contaminated with any pungent odor. After flame ionization detector analysis, the results showed that the chemical substances used had no obvious impurities. The substances purity was higher, which did not have other effects on the results of the subsequent series experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GC-MS Analysis of Aroma Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDE extracts were analyzed using Shimadzu GC–MS instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an olfactory detection port (ODP-2, Gerstel, Germany). The column used was DB-5 (J&W Scientific, California, USA) capillary column (length, 30 m; i. d., 0.25 mm and film thickness, 0.25 μm). A splitter was used at the end of column to split column effluent (1:1), one part being directed to MS, while the other part to sniffing port (ODP). Temperature programming for analysis were: column temperature was increased from 40 to 200 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min, maintained at initial temperature and 200 °C for 5 min, and then increased to 280 °C at the rate of 10 °C/min, held at final temperature for 20 min. Injector and interface temperatures were maintained at 210 and 280 °C, respectively. Helium was used as carrier gas with flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. Peaks were identified using mass spectral data of authentic standards (section 2.2) and mass spectral libraries (Wiley/NIST) provided with the instrument as well as by comparing retention index (RI) values of the compounds from available literature reports.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

GC-O Aroma Profiling of Milk Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aroma compounds were identified using an Agilent 7890 GC system coupled with an olfactory detection port (Gerstel ODP-2, Mulheim an der Ruhr, Germany). The GC effluent was set to be separated equally between the flame-ionization detector and the sniffer. Milk fan samples were separated on an HP-Innowax (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; Agilent Technologies) analytical fused-silica capillary column.
The air carried the capillary column effluent into a glass funnel where odor-specific magnitude estimation (OSME) analysis was conducted, which is a time-intensity method for GC-O. Fifteen panelists were trained before sniffing and were familiarized with the odor descriptions using solutions of the reference odorants. Panelists were required to note the onset and end time, odor characteristic, and intensity while sniffing the effluent from the sniffing mask. The aroma intensity was evaluated using a 5-point intensity scale from 0 to 5, where 0 was none, 3 was medium, and 5 was extremely strong. Each experiment was performed in triplicate by each panelist. The aroma intensity value was the average of the 15 panelists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!