The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti rat igg alexa fluor 488

1

Microtubule Visualization in Plant Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microtubule observations, control and extract-treated root rips were excised and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution in PEM buffer (50 mM PIPES, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgSO4, pH 6.8) + 5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 1 h. Fixed specimens underwent cell wall digestion with a 3% (w/v) Macerozyme R-10 + 3% (w/v) cellulase Onozuka R-10 (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) solution in PEM, for 90 min. After digestion, root tips were squashed gently on coverslips coated with poly-l-lysine and the released cells were left to dry and adhere. Afterwards, they were extracted with a 5% (v/v) DMSO + 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), for 1 h. Rat anti-α-tubulin (YOL 1/34, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA or Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was used as primary antibody (diluted 1:50 in PBS, incubated overnight) and anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) as secondary antibody (diluted 1:300 in PBS, incubated at 37 °C for 2 h). DNA counterstaining was performed using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min. Finally, specimens were mounted with anti-fade medium (PBS 1:2 glycerol (v/v) + 0.5% (w/v) p-phenylenediamine).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Aortic Macrophage Subtypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was performed as in ref. 17 (link), with modifications. M1 and M2 macrophages in aortic root sections were identified by co-staining for iNOS (#ab15323, Abcam) or mannose receptor (“CD206”, #64693, Abcam), respectively, and macrophage (CD68, #MCA1957GA, Bio-Rad), as follows: frozen sections were fixed in acetone (15 min, 4 °C), non-specific sites blocked, and this was followed by simultaneous incubation with antibodies against iNOS (1:100 dilution) and CD68 (1:300 dilution), or CD206 (1:100 dilution) and CD68 (1:300) for 3 hours. Sections were then incubated simultaneously with anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor-555 (#4413 S, Cell Signaling) and anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor-488 (#4416 S, Cell Signaling), both at 1:1,000 dilution (1 hour). Slides were mounted using the Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (Cell Signaling, #8961). All antibody dilutions were done using the IHC TEK antibody diluent (IW-1,000, IHC World).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping Leukemic Cells in NRG Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocytes were stained with anti-B220-allophycocyanin and anti-CD3-phycoerythrin (BD pharmingen). Leukemic cells from NRG mice were stained with anti-CD19-biotin (BD Biosciences) followed by anti-biotin- phycoerythrin-Vio770 (Miltenyi Biotech) and/or anti-B220-allophycocyanin (BD Biosciences). Dead cells were excluded using PI. Results were acquired using a BD LSR I (BD biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo. For intracellular detection of human AID PBMCs or BL cells were fixed with PBS 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with PBS 0.5% saponin 4% of FBS before adding mAb anti-AID (clone EK2 5G9, Cell Signaling Technology) followed by anti-Rat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Cell Signaling). Negative isotype controls were performed accordingly. In western blots, endogenous human AID was detected using the same antibody. Endogenous mouse AID was detected using mAb anti-AID (ebioscience, cat#14-5959-82 at 1:250 in 2.5% BSA). Densitometry was performed using ImageJ (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence analysis of corneal inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The eyes were harvested on the 7th day after alkali injury and embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound after the fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. We blocked 5 μm OCT frozen sections with 3% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and incubated the sections overnight at 4°C with a rat anti-F4/80 antibody (Abcam, ab66440, 1:200), rat anti-CD11b antibody (Abcam, ab8878, 1:200) or rabbit anti-CD31 antibody (Abcam, ab28364, 1:100). Detection of bound anti-F4/80, anti-CD11b or anti-CD31 antibodies was performed using anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Cell Signaling Technology, Germany, 1:1000), anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (Cell Signaling Technology, Germany, 1:1000) or anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (Cell Signaling Technology, Germany, 1:1000). After counterstaining with DAPI (Abcam, ab228549), the sections were mounted with antifade mounting medium (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The sections were viewed and photographed with fluorescence microscopy (DMI3000 B; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Corneal Inflammatory Cell Recruitment Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the corneal inflammatory cell recruitment test, mouse eyes were embedded in a compound at the optimal cutting temperature, sequentially sectioned (8 µm) and stored at −80°C. Subsequently, the frozen sections were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin at 37°C for 1 h. Then at 4°C, the frozen sections were inducible rat anti-F4/80 (Abcam, ab66440, 1:100) and rat anti-CD11b (Abcam, ab8878, 1:100) overnight. Sections were then washed with phosphate buffered saline and incubated with anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (cell signaling technology, 1:1,000) and anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Cell signaling Technology, Germany, 1:1,000) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by DAPI (Abcam, Ab228549) solution staining. Photographs were taken with a fluorescence microscope (DM 4000B). The number of positive cells was quantified using Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, United States) with the method described by et al. (Dai et al., 2018 (link)). All histological assessments were performed as blinded studies by the same two observers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!