The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tesla p40 gpu

Manufactured by NVIDIA

The Tesla P40 GPU is a high-performance graphics processing unit developed by NVIDIA. It is designed for data center and enterprise applications, offering powerful computational capabilities for scientific and industrial tasks. The Tesla P40 features a large number of CUDA cores, high-bandwidth memory, and advanced power efficiency, making it suitable for accelerating a wide range of compute-intensive workloads.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using tesla p40 gpu

1

GPU-Accelerated Deep Learning Training

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We utilized both local and cloud-based Amazon Web Services (AWS) GPU instances to train our models. Our two local instances included a single NVIDIA Tesla P-40 GPU and a single NVIDIA Tesla V-100 GPU, respectively. We also utilized up to three concurrent AWS cloud instances using the Deep Learning AMI, with one NVIDIA Tesla P-100 on each instance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rapid 2D Cardiac Segmentation Using U-Net

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During training, a random batch of 20 2D short-axis slices were fed into the network for each iteration after data pre-processing. The dropout rate for each dropout layer is set to be 0.2. In every iteration, cross entropy loss was calculated to optimize the network parameters through back-propagation. Specifically, the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method was used during the optimization, with an initial learning rate of 0.001. The learning rate was decreased by a factor of 0.5 every 50 epochs. The method was implemented using Python and PyTorch. We trained the U-Net for 1,000 epochs in total which took about 60 hours on one NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU using our proposed training strategy. During testing, the computation time for segmenting one subject is less than a second.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Image Classification Model Training Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the training stage, we applied a batch size of 40, a learning rate of 0.001, and 100 epochs to train our model. Considering the shape of our input images, we resized the patches to 1024 × 1024, reducing the computational resources. Moreover, we adopted the Adam solver [42 ] to optimize model parameters during the training phase. All the experiments were conducted in Pytorch [43 ] under an Ubuntu OS cloud server with an Intel Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @2.40 GHz, 40 GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU with 24 GB of memory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Deep Learning for Sorghum Head Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We train our network using a NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU (22GB of GPU memory) while evaluation and inference were carried out using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB of GPU memory). Training, evaluation and testing were done using the Keras deep learning library with Tensorflow backend on Python 2.7. The source code on RetinaNet built for Keras was accessed from [44 ] and then modified for our problem. The codes used for generating results and reproducing the results presented in this work are available at DeepSorghumHead (https://github.com/oceam/DeepSorghumHead).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Kidney Cyst Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The network architecture was similar to our previous works [22 (link), 23 (link)]. The convolution blocks consist of 2D convolutions, followed by dropout (dropout = 0.1), batch normalization, 2D convolutions, and max pooling (pool size = 2 × 2). The higher -resolution layers have larger kernels (going from 7 × 7 to 5 × 5 to 3 × 3 in blocks down the encoder path, and in reverse up the decoder path) in order to learn larger and more complex filter types. The skip connections are implemented as additive layers (Resnet-like [24 ]). The optimizer is Adam [25 ] with an initial learning rate of 1e-3, and decay of 1e-5. The loss metric is the Dice similarity metric. The model is trained for 200 epochs with a batch size = 8 and the model with the best validation measure is saved during the training process. The model was implemented in Keras with TensorFlow as the backend. The model was trained on an Nvidia Tesla P40 GPU (24 GB memory). The input to the model is a two-channel matrix (256 × 256 × 2). The first channel is an MR image slice and the second is the corresponding kidney mask. The output is the prediction for the cyst segmentation. In total, three models were trained on the three different training/validation folds, and an ensemble, majority vote model was then made and applied to the hold out test set. Code is made available at: https://github.com/TLKline/AutoKidneyCyst.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Dental Radiograph Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Faster R-CNN model was trained on 818 labeled bitewing radiographs. The bitewings were scaled to 800 px on the shorter side and then augmented by applying random transformations, such as flipping the image, center cropping, rotating, Gaussian blurring, sharpening, and adjusting the contrast and brightness.
The network was pretrained on ImageNet to determine the initial weights. During the training process, the model weights were updated to minimize a binary-focal loss function using an Adam optimizer. The Faster R-CNN model was trained over 200 epochs (24 h) with 8 batch sizes and a learning rate of 1e−3. The entire process was carried out on an NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU using CUDA 10.2. The model architecture and optimization process were carried out on the DL framework PaddlePaddle with Python.
A total of 160 bitewing radiographs from the test dataset were used to estimate the optimal Faster R-CNN algorithm weight factors. The results of two dental postgraduate students with less than 3 years of clinical experience were compared to the results of the neural network to assess the performance. The diagnosis standard and the calibration, consistency testing, and labeling procedures were the same as those of the experts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

3D-CNN Hyperspectral Image Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Adam optimizer was used to train our convolutional network weights based on mini-batches of size 32 [41 ]. We used a learning rate of 10−6 and set β1=0.9 , β2  = 0.999 and ϵ  = 10−8. The convolution layer kernels were initialized with normal distribution with standard deviation of 0.05. The dense layer neurons were initialized using glorot initialization [42 ]. The 3D-CNN model was trained for 126 epochs. Here, we used all the 240 wavelength bands of hyperspectral images for classification purpose. We trained 3DCNN model using Keras [43 ] with the Tensorflow [44 ] backend on a NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU. The time required for training was approximately 50 s/epoch. The plot of model accuracy on training and validation datasets during training is shown in Fig. 5.

Plot of model classification accuracy on training and validation data

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Epithelial and Necrotic Region Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We trained an end-to-end deep learning model (Linknet) to segment the epithelial regions35 . Linknet is a pixel-wise semantic segmentation network based on an encoder-decoder architecture. The model for the epithelial region segmentation was trained using 2,767 IHC image patches from 41 estrogen receptor, 37 progesterone receptor, and 394 Ki67 WSIs. The necrotic region segmentation model was trained using 2079 image patches from 255 PDL1 (SP142) WSIs. All the image patches were 832 × 832 pixels with 0.848 µm/pixel. The epithelial and necrotic regions were manually annotated on the image patches. The models were trained by nearly 300 epochs by minimizing the mean square loss. The drop rate was r = 0.8, the learning rate was 10–2 initially and decreased to 10–5 gradually, and the batch size was 64. Image augmentations of random flip and rotation were applied. The models were implemented by Python 3.6, Tensorflow 1.14, and Cuda 10.0 with NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU (RAM 24 G), with details in ref. 36 . As a result, a binary mask representing the epithelial region Mepithelium was predicted from the deep learning model. Similarly, we detected the necrotic region mask Mnecrotic.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optimized Deep Learning Framework for Image Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the training stage, all the training sets were shuffled, and all input images were normalized to the range of 0–1, and the batch size was set to 64. We optimized the generator and the discriminator alternately, both applying the Adam solver with a fixed learning rate of 0.0002 and momentum parameters of β1 = 0.5 and β2 = 0.999. Then, we set the random seed to 123. We trained our framework from scratch with the training sets to produce the “optimized” model. The training was stopped when training losses did not decrease for 200 consecutive epochs. We saved the generator model weights when the training Dice scores were at their highest. For the inference stage, we used the well-trained framework to segment the images. All the experiments were conducted in Pytorch [48 (link)] under an Ubuntu OS cloud server with an Intel Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @2.40 GHz, 40 GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU with 24 GB of memory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!