The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using pstat6

1

Cul5 Neddylation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed using 1% Triton-X lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1X Protease inhibitor cocktail EDTA free (Roche), 1X Halt phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific), Zn2+ chelator ortho-phenanthroline (o-PA) (LifeSensors) and deubiquitylase inhibitor PR-619 (LifeSensors). Protein lysate were quantitated using Bradford reagent. For Cul5 neddylation experiments whole-cell lysates were prepared as described previously49 (link). Briefly, cells were resuspended in SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM DTT, and 0.1% bromophenol blue), vortexed to reduce sample viscosity, denatured by boiling, and then cooled on ice. This is to prevent the de-neddylation during protein extractions. Samples were resolved on Novex Tris-Glycine Gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then transferred onto PVDF membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The membrane was probed with the primary antibodies Cul5 (Bethyl Lab; 1:5000), pJak1 (CST; 1:1000), Jak1 (BD; 1:1000), pSTAT6 (CST; 1:1000), STAT6 (CST; 1:1000), IL4Rα (BD; 1:1000), pIL4Rα (BD; 1:1000), Actin (SCBT; 1:5000), Cul5 (Bethyl; 1:5000). The membrane was then incubated with an appropriate secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 and the protein of interest was detected with Li-Cor odyssey imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of immune cell signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SCNP assay was performed as described previously [7 (link)]. Modulators and concentrations were as follows: 1000 IU/ml IFN-α (PBL); 50 ng/ml IL-4, 5 μg/ml anti-IgD (BD Biosciences); 50 ng/ml IL-2, 50 ng/ml IL-6, 50 ng/ml IL-27, 5 μg/ml R848 (Invivogen); 40 nM PMA (Sigma Aldrich), 3 μg/ml anti-CD3 (eBioscience), 10 μg/ml anti-mouse (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 10 μg/ml anti-IgM (Southern Biotech). For TCR stimulation, cells were exposed to anti-CD3 for 12 min, with anti-mouse added for the last 2 min; the anti-IgM modulation time was 10 min; all other modulation times were 15 min. Staining was performed using Ab cocktails with each cocktail consisting of 5 Abs to detect phenotypic markers and 2 Abs to detect intracellular protein readouts. Abs used include anti-CD3, -CD4, -CD45RA, -CD20, -p-NF-κB, -c-poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, -p-Stat1, -p-Stat3, -p-Stat5, -p-Stat6, -p-Erk, -p-ZAP70/Syk (BD Biosciences); -p-Akt, -p-S6 (CST); and -CD14 (Beckman Coulter). Flow cytometry data was acquired on FACS Canto II Flow Cytometers (BD Biosciences). All flow cytometry data were analyzed with WinList (Verity House Software). PBMC subpopulations were delineated according to the immunophenotypic gating scheme described previously [7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!