The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

60 protocols using disruptor genie

1

Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation (qChIP) was performed as described (Pidoux et al., 2004 (link)) with the following modifications: 5 ml of an overnight culture grown in YPAD with extra uridine (0.08 mg/ml), diluted into fresh YPAD with extra uridine (0.08 mg/ml) and grown until OD600 nm of 1.4. Cells (50 ml/sample) were fixed with 1% Paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were lysed using acid-washed glass beads (Sigma) and a Disruptor genieTM (Scientific Industries) for 30 min at 4°C. Chromatin was sheared to 500–1000 bp using a Bioruptor (Diagenode) for a total of 20 min (30 s ON and OFF cycle) at 4°C. Immunoprecipitation was performed overnight at 4°C using 2 μL of antibody anti-H3K4me2 (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39141), anti-H3K9ac (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39137), and anti-H4K16ac (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39167) and 25 μl of Protein G magnetic beads (Dynal – InVitrogen). DNA was eluted with a 10% slurry of Chelex 100-resin (Bio-Rad) using the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation with Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qChIP was performed as described33 (link) with the following modifications: 5 ml of an overnight culture grown in YPAD with extra uridine (0.08 mg/ml), diluted into fresh YPAD with extra uridine (0.08 mg/ml) and grown until OD600 nm of 1.4. Cells (50 ml/sample) were fixed with 1% Paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were lysed using acid-washed glass beads (Sigma) and a Disruptor genieTM (Scientific Industries) for 30 min at 4 °C. Chromatin was sheared to 500–1000 bp using a Bioruptor (Diagenode) for a total of 20 min (30 s ON and OFF cycle) at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitation was performed overnight at 4 °C using 2 μL of antibody anti-H3K4me2 (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39141), anti-H3K9ac (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39137), and anti-H4K16ac (Active Motif- Cat Number: 39167) and 25 μl of Protein G magnetic beads (Dynal - InVitrogen). DNA was eluted with a 10% slurry of Chelex 100-resin (Bio-Rad) using the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction from Bacterial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantities of 5 U (OD600) of culture samples were mixed with twice the volume of bacterial RNAprotect (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and centrifuged for 10 min at 5,000 rpm. The supernatants from these samples were discarded and cell pellets were mixed with 1 mL of TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), transferred to lysing matrix B tubes (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA), and subjected to lysis using Disruptor Genie (Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY) for 4 min at 3,000 rpm. The cell lysate was processed using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of isolated RNA were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated Bacterial DNA Extraction from Diverse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial DNA extraction from vaginal, rectal, and oral samples was carried out by BIKEN Biomics Inc. (Osaka, Japan) using an automated DNA extraction machine (GENE PREP STAR PI-480, Kurabo Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and NR-201 DNA extraction kit (Kurabo Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan). DNA was extracted according to manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 0.5 g of glass beads (0.1 mm diameter, IEDA Trading Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and 300 μL of No. 10 solution (NR-10025) were added to each stool suspensions (200 μL each), following which the mixture was agitated using DISRUPTOR-GENIE (Scientific Industries Inc., New York, USA) at 3000 rpm for 90 s. After centrifugation at 9700× g for 5 min, the supernatant of stool samples was collected and transferred to the machine fitting strips of eight sample tubes. Next, 150 μL of No. 2 solution (NR-2025) supplemented with proteinase K (final concentration 0.4 mg/mL, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and 150 μL of No. 10 solution (NR-10025) were added to the sample solution and the tubes were subjected to the automated DNA extraction machine, GENE PREP STAR PI-480. The concentration of extracted DNA was determined using Qubit assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Delaware, USA). Extracted DNA samples were stored at −30 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation and Milling of DCF Nanosuspension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DCF was prepared from a sodium salt solution following a published procedure by Pireddu et al., using diluted hydrochloric acid [12 (link)]. The obtained solid white precipitate of DCF was filtered, carefully washed with bidistilled water and dried. To prepare the nanosuspension, the drug was firstly added to an aqueous solution of P188 and homogenized by means of a rotor-stator homogenizer (Ultra Turrax T25 basic—IKA, Staufen, Germany) for 5 min at 6500 rpm. Secondly, the obtained suspension was transferred in conical tubes, and 0.1–0.2 mm yttrium-stabilized zirconia–silica beads were added to perform the milling. The tubes were then oscillated at 3000 rpm for 60 min by means of a bead-milling cell disruptor device (Disruptor Genie®, Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY, USA). Finally, sieving was carried out to separate the milling beads from the formulation. The resulting nanosuspension had a concentration of 10 mg/mL DCF and 5 mg/mL P188 (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of E. coli Cellular Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells and spent medium from a 10 ml E. coli pre-culture were separated by centrifugation at 1,500 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filter sterilized (0.2-µm cellulose membrane) and used for further analysis (“spent medium”). The collected cells were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0), re-suspended in 1.5 ml of PBS, and disrupted with sterile glass beads (diameter, 0.1 mm) using a cell disruptor (Disruptor Genie, Scientific Industries, NY, USA): a 2-ml tube containing 1.4 g beads and the cell suspension was mixed for 20 min with intervals to cool the tube in an ice-water bath. Following disruption, the volume of the mixture was raised to a total volume of 10 ml using PBS and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was filtrated (0.2-µm cellulose membrane) and used as a cell-free extract for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolating and Excysting Eimeria Oocysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eimeria spp. oocysts were collected from fecal samples of nonvaccinated animals showing coccidiosis symptoms. The samples were processed as indicated in Guidelines on techniques in coccidiosis research (Shirley, 1995 ) with some changes. Oocysts were resuspended in potassium dichromate 2% (Cat.#P5271, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to allow sporulation. The oocyst samples were cleaned with Dulbecco's modified phosphate buffered saline (DPBS, Cat.#D8537, Sigma-Aldrich) from potassium dichromate, and then, they were resuspended in lysis buffer T1 (Cat.# 740952.240 C, MACHEREY-NAGEL Inc., Bethlehem, PA) and stored at −80°C until qPCR analysis was performed as described below. After sporulation, the oocysts were washed and resuspended in sodium hypochlorite for sterilization, and then, they were washed and lysed with glass beads (0.5 mm) for 1 min with Disruptor Genie (Cat.# SI-D258, Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY) to obtain sporocysts. Those were washed and resuspended in excystation medium, containing 2.5 g/L trypsin (Cat.#T4049, Sigma-Aldrich), 5 g/L bile salts (Cat.#B3301, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 g/L pancreatin (Cat.#P1750, Sigma-Aldrich), and 2 g/L MgCl2 (Cat.# 459337, Carlo Erba Reagents, Milan, Italy). The suspension was incubated for 90 min at 39°C. Afterward, the obtained sporozoites were washed and resuspended in cell medium to initiate the invasion assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sperm RNA Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reducing agents TCEP (final concentration: 10–50 mM) (#77720; Pierce, Rockford, IL), DTT (final concentration: 150 mM) (#V3151; Promega, Madison, WI), or βME (final concentration: 2%) were added to Buf fer RLT (#79216; Qiagen, Limburg, The Netherlands) to a final volume of 500 µL. Three different homogenization techniques were also evaluated: (i) sperm were pulse-vor texed in lysis buf fer for 5 min, diluted 1:1 in nuclease free water, and then incubated with ProK (final concentration: 200 µg/mL) at 56°C for 2 h; (ii) sperm were pulse-vortexed in lysis buffer for 5 min, and lysates were loaded onto Qiashredder columns (#79656; Qiagen) and centrifuged for 2 min at maximum speed (≥17,000 × g); (iii) sperm cells were homogenized in the presence of lysis buffer and 0.1 g of 0.2 mm stainless steel beads (#SSB02; Next Advance, Averill Park, NY) for 5 min on a Disruptor Genie (#SI-238; Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY). To ensure equal aliquots of sperm, resuspended sperm cells after gradient isolation were vortexed for 10 s between each aliquot as previously described (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sperm DNA Extraction from Ejaculates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of sperm cell DNA from fresh ejaculates was performed as previously described40 (link). In short, sperm cells were isolated by centrifugation of the fresh (up to 2 days) ejaculate over an isotonic solution (90%) (Sage/Origio, ART-2100; Sage/Origio, ART-1006) using up to 2 mL of the sample. Following a washing step, quantity and quality were assessed using a cell counting chamber (Sigma-Aldrich, BR717805–1EA). Cells were pelleted and lysis was performed by addition of RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen, 79216), Bond-Breaker TCEP solution (Pierce, 77720), and 0.2 mm stainless steel beads (Next Advance, SSB02) on a Disruptor Genie (Scientific Industries, SI-238I). The lysate was processed using reagents and columns from an AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, 80204). Concentration of the final eluate was assessed employing standard methods. Concentrations ranged from ~0.5–300 ng/μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Efficient Sperm DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of sperm cell DNA from fresh ejaculates was performed as described (Breuss et al., 2020a (link); Wu et al., 2015 (link)). In short, sperm cells were isolated by centrifugation of the fresh (up to 2 days) ejaculate over an isotonic solution (90%) (Sage/Origio, ART-2100; Sage/Origio, ART-1006) using up to 2 mL of the sample. Following a washing step, quantity and quality were assessed using a cell counting chamber (Sigma-Aldrich, BR717805–1EA). Cells were pelleted and lysis was performed by addition of RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen, 79216), Bond-Breaker TCEP solution (Thermo Scientific, 77720), and 0.2 mm stainless steel beads (Next Advance, SSB02) on a Disruptor Genie (Scientific Industries, SI-238I). The lysate was processed using reagents and columns from an AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, 80204). Concentration of the final eluate was assessed employing standard methods. Concentrations ranged from ∼0.5–300 ng/μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!