The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using ics 6000

1

Geochemical Analysis of Fluid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH of each fluid sample was measured on site with pH strips, and all samples were within the range of 7 to 8. Prior to filtering, each fluid sample was subsampled into a sterile 50-mL Falcon tube and frozen on site for geochemistry analysis. Each geochemistry sample was analyzed via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (XSERIES 2, Thermo Scientific) for cations after acidification with nitric acid and via ion chromatograph (Dionex ICS 6000) for anions. Geochemistry data of each port are plotted against sampling time as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S12. Electrical conductivity values of the samples are estimated from the total ionic concentrations (see details in SI Appendix, Fig. S13) using the method described in McCleskey et al. (71 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Recombinant TtAA9E Enzyme Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthetic gene encoding TtAA9E gene from T. terrestris (ACE10234.1), obtained from Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany), was cloned into a pPICZα-A modified expression vector36 (link),56 (link). The resulting plasmid (~10 μg of pPICZT::lpmo) was inserted by transformation into P. pastoris X-33 and the secreted proteins were purified by affinity chromatography (HiTrap Chelating HP column) (GE Healthcare). Eluted proteins were copper saturated with Cu(II)SO4 and applied to a 120 mL Superdex 75/16 column (GE Healthcare) to remove the excess of copper. Finally, proteins were concentrated by ultrafiltration. The total protein was quantified using the Bradford method and purity was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The cellulosic substrate PASC (0.5% w-v)13 (link) was incubated with 1 μM TtAA9E in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) using 500 µM ascorbic acid as a reducing agent. The reaction was incubated in agitation at 800 rpm at 50 °C for 72 h. Five reaction tubes were prepared each time individually analyzed via HPAEC and later pooled and purified with molecular filter (3 KDa cut-off, Vivaspin) and stored at −20 °C until further used. HPAEC chromatography was done using a Dionex ICS6000 instrument equipped with PAD and a CarboPac PA1 column (2 × 250 mm). A large amount of AA9_COS was produced and available upon reasonable request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-Pressure Ion Chromatography for Polyphenol Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic determinations were carried out by using a high-pressure ion chromatography system (Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ ICS-6000 HPIC™ System, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) composed of a gradient mixer (Dionex GM-4, 2 mm), an injection valve with a 25-μL loop, a SP Single Pump (ICS- 6000), a Dionex anion self-regenerating suppressor (ADRS 600, 4 mm) set at the recommended voltage, and an electrochemical detector set to conductivity mode. The column compartment temperature was set at 20°C and the chromatographic column was the IonPac AS11 (250×2 mm i.d., particle size: 9μm) (Thermo Fisher, Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The separation of PPs was obtained by using the following gradient elution, based on 2 solutions, 10 mM NaOH (A) and 80 mM NaOH (B): isocratic step at 100% A for 4 minutes, from 0% to 15% B in 1 minute, isocratic for 2 minutes, from 15% to 50% B in 1 minute, isocratic for 9 minutes, from 50% to 0% B in 1 minute and a final re-equilibration step at 100% A for 2 minutes (total run time: 20 minutes). The system was interfaced to a personal computer via proprietary network chromatography data system (Chromeleon 7.2.8, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) for data acquisition/processing and instrumentation control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Carbohydrate Content and Sugar Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total carbohydrate content and sugar composition of Extracts 1 and 2 were determined after acidic hydrolysis, with the TFA at 120 °C × 1 h [23 (link)]. The monosaccharides were analysed using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD, Dionex ICS 6000, ED40 Electrochemical Detector) equipped with a Thermo Fisher Scientific Dionex CarboPac PA20 column (3 × 150 mm) coupled with a guard column (3 × 30 mm). Samples were filtered (0.2 Ny) before analysis and injected with a Dionex AS-AP autosampler. The eluent flow rate was 0.400 mL/min and the temperature was kept at 30 °C. The mobile phase was made of the following A, H2O Milli-Q; B, 0.2 M sodium hydroxide; and C, 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, 0.1 M sodium acetate. Elution was performed following the following method: 0–21 min, 1.5% B; 21–33 min, 50% B; 33–49 min, 100% C; 49–53 min, 100% A; and 53–70 min, 1.5% B [24 (link)]. A standard solution of adonitol, mannitol, fucose, arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose, and mannose was prepared to dissolve 25 mg of each sugar standard in 50 mL of Milli-Q water. Five scalar dilutions of standard solution in a 1–0.0625 ppm range were prepared for calibration. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and results were expressed on a dry weight percentage basis. Data were processed with the Dionex Chromeleon software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Diatomite Ion Content Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ion content in various solutions of diatomite was determined using the method of ion chromatography on the analytical ion-chromatographic system with conductometric detection Dionex ICS-6000. HPIC grade Standards and Reagents were used for analysis.
All the experiments were carried out at the temperature of 22 ± 1 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monosaccharide Composition Analysis by HPAEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the EPS samples were acid hydrolyzed, their monosaccharide composition was analyzed by high performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC) (DIONEX ICS-6000, USA) equipped with Dionex™ CarbopacTM PA-20 anion exchange chromatography column (3 × 150nm) and electrochemical detector. NaOH (5 mmol) was used as the mobile phase with a ow rate of 0.4 mL/min at 30 ℃ [36]. Established calibration curves of mannose, rhamnose, glucose, galactose, and arabinose were used for quantitative analysis [37] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Characterization of Ulvan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 5 mg mL−1 solution of ulvan was prepared in 100 mL of 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5 and 0.6 M NaCl. Hydrolysis reactions were carried out overnight at 20 °C and 100 rpm for 24 h with 52 µg of enzyme. The reaction mixture was topped up with the same amount of enzyme after 15 h. Breakdown of the polysaccharide was verified by comparative analysis of unhydrolysed and hydrolysed samples using C-PAGE as described by Zablackis and Perez (1990 ).
Identification of the major breakdown products was achieved by High Pressure Anion Exchange Chromatography (HPAEC). A small portion (25 µL) of the reaction mixture was injected on a Thermo ICS6000 chromatographic system composed of an AG11-HC guard column (4 × 50 mm) and an AS11-HC anion exchange column (4 × 250 mm) connected in series and equilibrated in 8 mM NaOH. Elution was at a flowrate of 0.5 mL min−1 using a multistep NaOH gradient from 8 to 280 mM in 40 min. Charged oligosaccharides were detected using a DC conductivity detector associated to a DRS600 suppressor functioning under a 347 mA current. For comparison, previously purified and characterised oligomers (Δ-Rha3S, Δ-Rha3S-HexA-Rha3S, Δ-Rha3S-Xyl-Rha3S) from ulvan (Reisky et al. 2019 (link)) were also injected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nitrate Analysis via Ion Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After centrifugation, the supernatant of 1 mL culture was directly used for NO3 concentration measurements on an ICS-6000 ion chromatography (IC) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A Dionex IonPac AS11 with guard column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was set to 30 °C and operated with a flow of 2.0 mL·min−1. Mobile phase A was 100% H2O and phase B 100 mmol·L−1 NaOH. The binary gradient was from 0 to 1 min 0.2% B, from 1 to 6 min to 5% B, from 6 to 13 min increase to 24% B, from 13 to 13.5 min set to 38% B, and hold until 14.5 min. After this, the initial 0.2% B was reached after 15 min and held until 20 min for equilibration before the next injection. A conductivity detector combined with AERS suppressor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for analyte detection. Nitrate standards (Sigma Aldrich, St. Lewis, MO, USA) were prepared and used for quantification of the samples. Data was logged and evaluated by Chromeleon 7.2.8 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Polysaccharide and Glucosamine Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification and quantification of polysaccharide neutral sugars were performed by gas-liquid chromatography (GC) after sulfuric acid degradation as described in reference (86 (link)). Briefly, 5 mg of dried alkali insoluble fraction was dispersed in 2 N trifluoroacetic acid and then hydrolyzed 90 min at 121°C. Neutral monosaccharides were converted to alditol acetates and analyzed on a TG-225 GC Column (30 × 0.32 mm ID) using TRACE Ultra Gas Chromatograph (Thermo Scientific; temperature 205°C, carrier gas H2). Standard sugars’ solution and inositol as internal standard were used for calibration.
Glucosamine residues were quantified after acid hydrolysis [adapted from reference (87 (link))] and HPAEC-PAD analyses [adapted from reference (88 (link))]. Briefly, 5 mg of dried alkali insoluble fraction was dispersed in acetic acid 1% and hydrolyzed in concentrated HCl 10 M at 105°C during 6 h. After dilution in milli-Q water, glucosamine residues were quantified by HPAEC-PAD (ICS-6000, Thermo Scientific) using a CarboPac PA20 column (2 × 250 mm, Thermo Scientific), thermostated at 30°C. An isocratic elution of 1.7 mM sodium acetate (NaOAc) in 1 mM NaOH was used at a 0.25 mL/min flow rate. Standard glucosamine solutions were used for calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anion Analysis by Ion Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IC mobile phase A (MPA; weak) was water, and mobile phase B (MPB; strong) was water containing 100 mM KOH. A Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-6000+ system included a Thermo IonPac AS11 column (4 μm particle size, 250 × 2 mm) with column compartment kept at 35°C. The autosampler tray was chilled to 4°C. The mobile phase flow rate was 360 μL/min, and the gradient elution program was: 0–5 min, 1% MPB; 5–25 min, 1–35% MPB; 25–39 min, 35–99% MPB; 39–49 min, 99% MPB; 49–50, 99–1% MPB. The total run time was 50 min. To assist the desolvation for better sensitivity, methanol was delivered by an external pump and combined with the eluent via a low dead volume mixing tee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!