The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using snabi

1

Yeast Plasmid DNA Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen pellets were re-suspended in 0.4 ml of DNA Extraction Buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS) along with 40 Units of lyticase (Sigma-Aldrich, L2524) and 5 μl 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma Aldrich, 63689). Samples were incubated at 37°C for 5 min before addition of 450 μl phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (25:25:1, Sigma-Aldrich) and mixing by rotation. Phase lock tubes (5 Prime, 2302800) were used to collect the aqueous layer, by centrifugation for 5 min at 12 000 rpm. DNA was ethanol precipitated by addition of roughly 2× volume of 100% EtOH and washed once in 70% EtOH before air-drying and solubilisation in 10 mM Tris pH 8.0.
For plasmid DNA catenation analysis of pRS316, purified DNA was nicked with Nb.Bsm1 (New England Biolabs, R0706S) according to manufacturer's instructions.
For fork pausing analysis of pRS426-RFB, purified DNA was digested with BamHI-HF (New England Biolabs, R3136S) and SnaBI (New England Biolabs, R0130L) or SnaBI alone according to manufacturer's instructions.
After nicking/digestion the DNA was precipitated, washed and solubilised as above with the addition of 300 mM Sodium Acetate pH 5.2 at the first ethanol addition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tagging and RNAi of Trypanosome Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAP110–PTP was created by amplification of the TAP110 open reading frame (ORF) (Tb927.11.7590) positions 2242 to 2922 from genomic NYsm DNA and was cloned between the ApaI and EagI (NEB) sites of the pLEW100 based PTP tagging vector (Schimanski et al., 2005 (link)). We linearized the resulting plasmid with XcmI (NEB) prior to transfection. TAP110 RNAi targeting the ORF (positions 2081 to 2629) was cloned into a tet-inducible RNAi vector (Bochud-Allemann and Schneider, 2002 (link)) in two steps by cloning with the restriction enzymes BamHI HF, HindIII HF, XbaI and XhoI (NEB) to generate the later hairpin loop double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) for RNAi. The final plasmid was linearized with NotI HF (NEB) prior to transfection. The ORF of TAP110 was amplified and inserted without the stop codon by cloning with the restriction enzymes HindIII HF and XhoI (NEB) into a modified pLew100 vector for overexpression (Wenger et al., 2017 (link); Wirtz et al., 1999 (link)).
For the Tb927.11.6660-PTP construct, the ORF positions 2397 to 2805 were amplified as described above and cloned between the ApaI and EagI sites. We used SnaBI (NEB) to linearize the plasmid prior to transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

16S rDNA-based Lactobacillus Strain Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 16S rDNA sequences of the three Lactobacillus strains (L. gasseri, L. reuteri, and L. salivarius) identified in the fecal samples were obtained from the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and determination of suitable restriction endonucleases for RFLP analysis was performed by a virtual restriction digest analysis tool (RestrictionMapper version 3, http://www.restrictionmapper.org). Three restriction endonucleases, including EcoRI, SnaBI, and NcoI, were selected for Lactobacillus typing. Polymerase chain reaction–amplified 16S rDNA (480 ng) of each isolate was digested with individual EcoRI, SnaBI, or NcoI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) at 37°C for 20 h in 15 μL volumes with recommended reaction buffers. Digested 16S rDNA products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels (10 × 10 cm) at 100 V for 75 min. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by an UV transilluminator. The final confirmation of the isolates was achieved by the 16S rDNA sequence analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SLC39A14-EGFP Construct Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following linearization of SLC39A14-EGFP constructs with SnaBI (NEB), capped mRNA was generated using the mMessage mMachine Sp6 Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). About 50 pg of either SLC39A14 mRNA (transcript 1/2) was co-injected with 50 pg mRNA encoding membrane mCherry. Injected embryos were fixed at 6 hpf in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight. Following several washes in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 embryos were blocked in 10% goat serum at room temperature for 1 h. This was followed by incubation with primary antibody (chicken anti-GFP (1:500, ab13970, Abcam), rabbit anti-RFP (1:1,000; PM005, MBL)) at 4 °C overnight. Following washes in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100, embryos were incubated in fluorescent secondary antibody (goat anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 (1:200, A-11039, Life Technologies), goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (1:200, A-11011, Life Technologies)) at 4 °C overnight. DAPI (1:500, Life Technologies) was used for nuclear staining. Embryos were mounted in 1.5% low melt agarose and imaged on a Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope using a × 25 0.95 water-immersion objective. Z-stacks were acquired in 1-μm intervals and maximum-intensity projections generated with Fiji software62 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation of DNA Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 12 and Supplementary Fig. 21) were purchased from IDT (Leuven, Belgium) and HPLC purified. The DNA substrates were obtained by folding or hybridization in 20 mM MOPS pH 7.4, 75 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, at 85 °C for 3 min followed by slow cooling to room temperature before storage at −20 °C. E.coli genomic DNA (Sigma) was digested with EcoRV and SnaBI (NEB) at 37 °C for 4 h to create blunt-end DNA substrates. DNA concentration was calculated by measuring absorbance at 260 nm and the number of moles of dsDNA was calculated according to E.coli genomic restriction map analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

KI Embryo Generation and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Putative KI embryos prepared by ldsDNA electroporation or AAV infection were cultured for 5 days in mR1ECM to develop them into 8-cell embryos to blastocysts. The zona pellucida was removed using acidic Tyrode’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich), and then directly subjected to genomic PCR using Tks Gflex DNA polymerase and the primers listed in Table S1. PCR fragments were electrophoresed and sequenced for further confirmation. For PCR-RFLP analysis, Tyr alleles were amplified by PCR and digested using the restriction enzyme SnaBI (New England Biolabs), and electrophoresed to detect the KI allele.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cloning and Expressing GAD65 and H3N2 HA Reactive TCRs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GAD65 reactive TCR expression construct was described in Ref. [29 (link)]. The sequence for the H3N2 HA reactive TCR HA1.7 was obtained from the NCBI nucleotide database: GenBank accession number X63455.1 (TCRα), and X63456.1 (TCRβ), as deposited by Hewitt et al. [30 (link)]. The variable TCRα and TCRβ chains were ordered as separate gBlocks (IDT), or with both the TCRα and TCRβ sequence in the same gBlock, containing 5′ and 3′ adaptors with respective restriction sites, and sequentially cloned into the TCR-pMSCVII-Ametrine (TCR-pMIA) plasmid [29 (link)]. Briefly, the TCRα gBlock and vector were digested with SnaBI and SacII (both New England Biolabs), and the digested gBlock product was purified with a DNA clean and concentrate kit (Zymo Research), while the digested TCR-pMIA plasmid was run on an agarose gel and the correct band purified with a gel purification kit (Zymo Research). The purified insert and plasmid backbone were ligated, and the product expanded in DH5α competent cells (Invitrogen). The insert was confirmed by sequencing, and subsequently the TCRβ was cloned into the vector by restriction digestion using MfeI and BstbI (both New England Biolabs), using the same setup as for the cloning of the TCRα chain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromatin Conformation Capture (3C) Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1×106 cells were collected and crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde. After stopping the crosslinking via glycine, the cells were lysed using lysis buffer and centrifuged to remove cellular debris. The chromatin was then diluted 3-fold using a ChIP dilution buffer containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) and digested overnight at 37°C with restriction enzymes including EcoNI, SnaBI, SalI, and NotI (New England Biolabs). The digested chromatin was further diluted 6-fold into a T4 ligation buffer before ligation was performed for 4 h at room temperature using T4 DNA ligase and 0.5 mM ATP. DNA was purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) followed by CHIP-qPCR. For CHIP assay, anti-DNMT3 (Abcam) was used to bind target protein-DNA complexes. The primers used in the 3C-ChIP-PCR assays are listed in the Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Obtaining IBV-M41 S1 Gene Sequence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain the fragment coding for the M41-S1 gene, RNA was isolated from a virus stock of IBV-M41 (Animal Health Service, The Netherlands) using the QIAamp viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Switzerland) with random hexamers according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was performed with Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the primers listed in Table 1. To exchange the S1 domain of IBV-H52 for that of M41 in the plasmid used for targeted recombination, the M41-S1 PCR product and the previously generated plasmid containing the H52-S gene [16 (link)] were digested using restriction enzymes PacI and SnaBI (both New England Biolabs, USA), ligated and subsequently transformed in HB101 E. coli. Sequences were confirmed by automated nucleotide sequencing (Macrogen, The Netherlands). A step-wise ligation approach was used to obtain the H52 M41-S1 donor plasmid. To introduce mutations leading to individual N-to-A substitutions in N-glycosylation sites in the receptor binding domain (RBD) sequence, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the primers listed in Table 1. The sequences of the plasmids containing the S1 gene with the introduced mutations were confirmed by automated nucleotide sequencing (Macrogen, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Construction of Retroviral Catalase Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Restriction enzymes SnabI and SalI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) were used to digest the human catalase sequence from the CAT-pC1 plasmid [36 (link)], which was then subcloned into the pBABE-puro retroviral vectors (a gift from Hartmut Land and Jay Morgenstern and Bob Weinberg, Addgene plasmid # 1764). After verification by sequencing, these retroviral constructs were co-transfected into HEK293T cells with two packaging vectors VSV-G, and Gag-Pol using Fugene 6 (Promega, E2692, Madison, WI). Two days after transfection, the culture supernatant containing viruses was purified by filtration through 0.45 μm filters and stored at -80 °C. Puromycin selection was performed after virus transduction at 1 μg/ml in culture media for 3 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!