The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3730 genetic analyzer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Poland

The 3730 Genetic Analyzer is a capillary electrophoresis instrument designed for DNA sequencing and fragment analysis applications. It utilizes a 48-capillary array to perform high-throughput analysis of genetic samples. The instrument provides precise and reliable data for a variety of life science research and diagnostic workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

104 protocols using 3730 genetic analyzer

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Transcript Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA products were subject to the same primer sequences and PCR conditions as mentioned above, with the exception of forward primer sequence used for this reaction was labeled with 5’ 56-JOEN fluorophore. The RT-PCR products amplified using JOE fluorophore labeled primer were subjected to fragment analysis on 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with the internal lane standard 600 (ILS 600) (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), used as a DNA ladder to assign correct sizes to DNA fragments. The percentages of the different transcripts of the total transcripts were calculated based on the peak heights of individual fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Generation and Validation of eGFP-ffLuc Vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The generation of retrovirus vectors encoding the fusion protein eGFP-ffLuc has previously been described. [47 (link)] After transduction, eGFP positive cells were sorted by FACS, (FACS Aria II, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). To confirm luciferase transgene function, 2.5x104 cells in 50 μL of medium were lysed with 50 μL of D-luciferin according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI), and the bioluminescence signal was read at the luminometer (Synergy H1 Hybrid, BioTek, Winooski, VT). The eGFP-ffLuc vector was used to transduce the MV4-11 cell line or ATCs; eGFP expression was assessed by FACS analysis (FACS Calibur, Canto II, BD), whereas expression of ffLuc was detected using D-luciferin. The integrity of cloning for all constructs used in this manuscript was confirmed by Sanger sequencing performed by the Heflin Center for Human Genetics of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit as per the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequencing products were run following standard protocols on an Applied Biosystems 3730 Genetic Analyzer with POP-7 polymer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Knockdown of six7 gene in zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One of three different morpholinos (MO) were injected into one-cell stage WT embryos (Gene Tools, LLC, Philomath, OR): mispaired-control MO, 5’-CGAACGCCATTCCGAGTCTGACTAAC-3’; antisense nucleotide targeting six7 5’-UTR (MO1),5’-CCAACGGCATTCCAGTGTGAGTAAC-3’ [73 (link)]; and six7 splice-blocking MO (MO3), 5’-GTACTTTTTGGTCTCACCTTAAAGC-3’. Unless otherwise stated, embryos were injected with 0.87 ng of the indicated MO. To confirm the efficiency of MO3, RNA was isolated from un-injected and MO3-injected embryos and the region spanning from exon 1 to exon 2 of the six7-transcript was amplified by PCR using primers listed in S1 Table. The truncated six7-transcript was sequenced using Applied Biosystems 3730 Genetic Analyzer with Capillary Electrophoresis (Foster City, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic Deletion Mapping Using PCR and Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient blood DNA was extracted using Promega Maxwell 16 Blood DNA Purification Kits (Promega). Primers were designed adjacent to the estimated deleted region boundaries, and a Qiagen Taq PCR Core Kit was used to amplify the deletion boundaries. DNA fragments were gel‐purified using E‐Gel SizeSelect Gels (Life Technologies). DNA sequencing was performed by PCR using a Qiagen Taq PCR Core Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's specifications, followed by bidirectional sequencing using the Big Dye Terminator v.1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's specifications and run on an ABI 3130xl or 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sanger sequencing was conducted at the CCR Genomics Core at the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. Forward and reverse sequences were evaluated using Sequencher 5.0.1 (Genecodes). All deletion breakpoint coordinates and Alu locations are based on the GRCh37/hg19 genome build.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of TAPBP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HLA class I genotypes were determined by either the PCR–sequence-based typing protocol, as recommended by the 13th International Histocompatibility Workshop or by targeted next-generation sequencing, as described (11 (link)).
DNA from individuals in the three South African cohorts and the NCI RDP (the majority of the NCI RDP are of European descent) was sequenced for the 5′ UTR, exons, and 3′ UTR of TAPBP. Three gene segments were amplified with Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) in several fragments: from the 5′ UTR to the beginning of the third intron (approx. 1.5 kb), from the end of the third intron to the beginning of the seventh intron (approx. 1.5 kb), and from the end of the seventh intron to the end of the 3′ UTR (approx. 2.1 kb) (see SI Appendix, Table S7, for primer sequences). The amplified fragments were sequenced by using the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and run on a 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) (primers used for sequencing are listed in the SI Appendix, Table S7). rs111686073 and rs59097151 were genotyped in the individuals from the Ugandan cohorts by amplifying the two regions containing the SNPs with Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) (primers used for amplification and sequencing are listed in the SI Appendix, Table S7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bisulfite Sequencing of Porcine IUGR/NBW DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR primers were designed using the online MethPrimer software (http://www.urogene.org/methprimer/index.html). Genomic DNA extractions of IUGR/NBW 5–10 were performed using the same method as mentioned above. 400 ng of DNA samples were converted using ZYMO EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (ZYMO) and one-third of the elution products were used as templates. PCR amplification was carried out with a thermal cycling program of 94 °C for 1 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and then final 5 min incubation at 72 °C. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN) and subcloned. Twenty-four colonies from each product were sequenced using the 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Then, the reads were post-processed and aligned to the pig reference regions (all PCR regions) using SOAP aligner (Version 2.01) after sequencing according to a previously published method with default parameters that excluded reads with more than five mismatched bases. Multiple reads mapping to the same position were counted only once to remove potential bias from PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BRCA1/2 Exon Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood with a QiAmp® DNA blood purification kit (Qiagen). BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons were amplified by PCR with specific primers located in intron/exon boundaries. Twenty-eight fragments covering the 22 coding exons of BRCA1 and 32 fragments covering the 26 coding exons of BRCA2 gene were amplified.48 (link) The large exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2 were amplified as two and nine fragments, respectively, while exon 11 of BRCA1 was amplified as seven fragments (Supplementary Table 1). PCRs were carried out with initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s with a GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) as described previously.48 (link)The PCR products were purified with a MinElute 96UF kit and sequenced using a Big Dye terminator V3.1 sequencing kit on a 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Both forward and reverse strands were sequenced. Obtained sequences were compared with BRCA1 GenBank reference sequence (NM_007294.3) with Alamut Software. This method was used for the first 15 index cases recruited.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microdeletion Syndromes Screening by MLPA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples using the Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen, CA, USA). MLPA P245 kits (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were used to screen common microdeletion syndromes following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, DNA was denatured at 98 °C for 5 min and hybridized with the probes at 60 °C for 16 h. Ligation was performed at 54 °C for 15 min, and ligated probes were subsequently amplified by PCR using universal fluorescent primers. The fragments were separated by capillary electrophoresis using the 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and analyzed using Coffalyser software (MRC-Holland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sanger Sequencing of Candidate Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR amplification of selected candidate variants from exome sequence analysis were amplified using standard PCR primers. Amplicons were assessed via agarose gel electrophoresis, then purified by treating 5 μl of PCR product with 2μl of Exonuclease and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Exo-SAP-IT; Affymetrix) and submitted to the Molecular Genetics Core Facility at Boston Children’s Hospital or the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research (ICBR) at the University of Florida for sequencing using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing protocols (Applied Biosystems, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA). Sequence data were generated in an ABI Prism® 3130 or 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), formatted by ABI Sequencing Analysis software v.5.2 and KB Basecaller, and analyzed using Sequencher v.5.2.3 or earlier versions (GeneCodes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI). Sanger sequencing was performed in affected family members and other informative family members to confirm pathogenic mutations and track co-segregation patterns. The only widespread screening performed via Sanger sequencing was for FKRP in 18 families who had exome sequencing on an older platform that did not have good coverage of that gene7 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Profiling of Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TP53 mutations in exons 5–9, KRAS in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) and BRAF exon 15 (V600E) were analyzed by direct sequencing using the ABI PRISM 3100 and 3730 Genetic Analyzer, (Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA, USA) as described previously13 (link)14 (link) using the following primers:
TP53 Exon 5–6: Forward TGACTTTCAACTCTGTCTCC Reverse GCCACTGACAACCACCCTTA
TP53 Exon 7: Forward CCAAGGCGCACTGGCCTCATC Reverse TCAGCGGCAAGCAGAGGCT
TP53 Exon 8–9: Forward GACCTGATTTCCTTACTGCCTC Reverse GACTGGAAACTTTCCACTTGA
KRAS Exon 2: Forward TACTGGTGGAGTATTTGATAGTG Reverse CTGTATCAAAGAATGGTCCTG
BRAF Exon 15: Forward CTTCATAATGCTTGCTCTGATAGG Reverse GCATCTCAGGGCCAAAAAT
Sense and antisense sequencing was performed for confirmation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!