The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using goat anti rat cy3

1

Immunolabeling Analysis of GAL4 Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunolabelling for the analysis of GAL4 lines was performed as previously described [5 (link)–7 (link),12 ]. Either 97% TDE [53 (link)] or VECTASHIELD (VECTASHIELD®, Vector) was used as mounding medium. The employed primary antibodies were the rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Invitrogen; A11122) or rat anti-N-cadherin (DN-EX #8; 1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). The employed secondary antibodies were the cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies to IgG (H+L): AlexaFluor-488 goat anti-rabbit (1:1000; Invitrogen; A11034) or Cy3 goat anti-rat (1:200; Jackson Labs). Optical sections of whole-mount brains were sampled with a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1200). Confocal stacks were analyzed with the open-source software Image-J (National Institute of Health) and Fiji [54 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining and Imaging of Fly Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissection of fly brains was performed as previously described (Kondo et al., 2020 (link)) with minor modifications. Brains of female flies were dissected in PBS, pre-fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS on the ice for up to 30 min, then fixed in 2% PFA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Fixed brains were washed in PBT (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 3 × 10 min. Immunostaining was performed by Kondo et al. (2020) (link). The following primary antibodies were used at the indicated dilution: rabbit anti-GFP (1:1,000; Invitrogen; A11122), mouse anti-TH (1:100; ImmunoStar Inc.; 22941), rabbit anti-CCHa2 (1:1,000) (Ida et al., 2012 (link)), and rat anti-N-cadherin (DN-EX #8; 1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). The following secondary antibodies were used at the indicated dilution: AlexaFluor-488 goat anti-rabbit (1:1,000; Invitrogen; A11034), Cy3 goat anti-rabbit (1:200; Jackson Labs), Cy3 goat anti-rat (1:200; Jackson Labs), and AlexaFluor-568 goat anti-mouse (1:1,000; Invitrogen; 11004). 86% Glycerol was used as a mounting medium, and either native or immunostained fluorescence was imaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemistry Protocol for Neuron Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed as previously described (Aso et al., 2014) . The following primary antibodies were used at the indicated dilution: rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Invitrogen; A11122), mouse anti-TH (1:100; ImmunoStar Inc.; 22941) and mouse anti-ChAT (1:100; DSHB; ChAT4B1). The following secondary antibodies were used at the indicated dilution: AlexaFluor-488 goat antirabbit (1:1000; Invitrogen; A11034), Cy3 goat anti-rat (1:200; Jackson Labs) or AlexaFluor-568 goat anti-mouse (1:1000; Invitrogen). For Brp::SNAP staining, SNAP-Surface Alexa Fluor 647 (1:1000; NEB; S9136S) was used at the indicated dilution. For immunostained samples (Figures 1, 2, 5, 6, S1, and S6), either SeeDB (Ke et al., 2013) or 86% glycerol was used as a mounding medium. For ethanol sedation experiments (Figure 7), SeeDB2G was used as a mounting medium and no immunostaining was utilized. For the systematic expression profiling (Figures 4 andS3), 86% glycerol was used as a mounting medium and the native GFP and RFP fluorescence were imaged without immunohistochemistry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Adult Neurogenesis Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The activation of adult‐born cells was examined using immunohistofluorescence. To visualize cells that incorporated thymidine analogs, one‐in‐ten sections were incubated with different anti‐BrdU antibodies (BrdU and CldU, rat primary antibodies at 1/200 Accurate Chemical; IdU, mouse primary antibodies at 1/200, BD Biosciences). Sections were also incubated with Zif268 (rabbit, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Bound antibodies were visualized, respectively, with Cy3‐goat anti‐rat (1:1,000, Jackson) or Cy3‐goat anti‐mouse (1:1,000, Jackson) and Alexa 488 goat anti‐rabbit antibodies (1:1,000, Jackson). CldU‐Zif268 and IdU‐Zif268 labeling were analyzed on different sections because of some cross‐reactivity between secondary antibodies made in mice or rat (Figure 1 in Tronel, Charrier, et al., 2015). All BrdU, CldU, or IdU‐labeled cells expressing Zif268 (one side) were analyzed using a confocal microscope with HeNe and Arg lasers (Leica, DMR TCSSP2AOBS), with a plane apochromatic 63X oil lens (numerical aperture 1.4; Leica). The percentage of BrdU, CldU, or IdU‐labeled cells that expressed Zif268 was calculated as follow: (Nb of Xd +/IEG+ cells)/[(Nb of XdU+/IEG cells) + (Nb of XdU+/IEG+ cells)] × 100. All sections were optically sliced in the Z plane using 1‐µm interval, and cells were rotated in orthogonal planes to verify double labeling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cell Proliferation and Neuronal Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One‐of‐ten series was incubated with a rat monoclonal anti‐BrdU antibody (1/200, Accurate Chemical) and with a mouse monoclonal anti‐NeuN antibody (1:500, Millipore). Bound anti‐BrdU and anti‐NeuN antibodies were visualized with a Cy3‐goat anti‐rat (1:1,000, Jackson) and an Alexa 488 goat anti‐mouse IgG antibody (1:1,000, Jackson). The phenotype of IdU‐IR cells and CldU‐IR cells was determined using rabbit anti‐calbindin antibodies (1/200, Millipore) that were revealed with Alexa 488 goat anti‐rabbit IgG antibodies (1/500, Jackson). We also analyzed the phenotype of Zif268 cells by incubating one‐in‐ten sections with a rabbit anti‐Zif268 antibody (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and a mouse monoclonal anti‐NeuN antibody (1:500, Millipore). Bound anti‐Zif268 and anti‐NeuN antibodies were visualized with a Cy3‐goat anti‐rabbit (1:1,000, Jackson) and an Alexa 488 goat anti‐mouse IgG antibody (1:1,000, Jackson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Drosophila Wing Disc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Either last-instar larval or 12–24 h pupal wing discs were fixed for 30 min in 0.1 M PIPES (pH 6.9), 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM MgSO4, and 1.8% formaldehyde. The discs were then incubated in 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, and 5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) (block buffer) for a minimum of 2 h at 4 °C. The wings were then placed in 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, and 1 mg/ml BSA (wash buffer) containing either rabbit anti-Spalt (1:200), or mouse anti-En/Inv (4F11) (1:5)/rat anti-Ci (1:25)/rabbit anti-Dll (1:100) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The wings were washed 4 times in wash buffer and then incubated for 2 h at 4 °C in wash buffer containing goat anti-mouse FITC (1:200, Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA), goat anti-rat Cy3 (1:200, Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA), and goat anti-rabbit Cy5 (1:200, Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA). The wing discs were washed four times in wash buffer and then placed on glass slides with the Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Glass coverslips were applied over the discs and images were collected on a MRC600 laser-scanning confocal microscope. Images were individually collected and then assembled using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining of Optically Cleared Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used for immunostaining of optically cleared tissues: polyclonal rabbit anti‐α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Abcam; ab5694; 1 : 300); and from (BioLegend UK Ltd, London, UK): rat anti‐CD45 clone 30‐F11 (103102; 1 : 300), CD11c clone N418 (117302; 1 : 200) and MHCII I‐A/I‐E clone M5/114.15.2 (107601; 1 : 300). The following macrophage markers were found to be unreliable with the tissue clearing protocols used: rat anti‐F4/80 (clone BM8), rat anti‐CD11b (clone M1/70), rat anti‐CD68 (clone FA‐11) (all from BioLegend) and rat anti‐F4/80 (clone Cl:A3‐1; from AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK). The following secondary antibodies (all used at 1 : 500) were purchased from Invitrogen: goat anti‐rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008), goat anti‐rat Alexa Fluor 647 (A21247) and goat anti‐rat Cy3 (A10522); and from (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Ely, UK): goat anti‐Armenian hamster Cy3 (127‐165‐160).
For 2D analysis, SMA expression was detected using a mouse anti‐human SMA primary antibody (clone 1A4, Agilent; M0851) with a peroxidase‐conjugated ImmPRESS anti‐mouse IgG polymer detection kit (Vector Laboratories Ltd; MP‐7402, Peterborough, UK) using standard development with DAB. Mouse IgG1 was used for species‐ and isotype‐matched control (Agilent; X0931).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Developmental Profiling of Murine Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P1 brains, representing pups from 4–5 independent litters, were fixed in 4% PFA, cryopreserved through incubation in 10%-20%-30% sucrose/1 X PBS gradient over 72 hours at 4°C, mounted in O.C.T. compound and stored at -20°C. Brains were cryo-sectioned coronally at 20 μm over a series of 7 slides, such that each slide contained representative non-consecutive brain sections. Slides were re-hydrated in 1X PBS and incubated in blocking solution containing 2% goat serum/0.01% Triton-X in 1X PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Antibodies were dissolved in blocking solution and applied over night at 4°C as follows: anti-PECAM1 (rat, 1:50; Thermo Fisher Scientific); anti-PH3 (rabbit, 1:1000; Millipore-Sigma) anti-Satb2 (mouse, 1:250; Abcam); anti-Tbr1 (rabbit, 1:250; Abcam). DAPI (1:4000; Millipore-Sigma) was used to detect cell nuclei. The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-rabbit CY3 (1:250; Jackson Immunoresearch); goat anti-mouse Alexa488 (1:1000; Jackson Immunoresearch); goat anti-rat CY3 (1:250; Jackson Immunoresearch).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Staining for BrdU

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were denatured in 2N HCl for 50 minutes at room temperature and then neutralized twice in 0.1M borate buffer, pH 8.5, rinsed again in PBST, blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBST for 1 hour, and incubated overnight at 4°c in a mixture of rat anti-BrdU antibody in PBST + 5% normal serum. The following day, sections were incubated for 1.5h at room temperature in a mixture of secondary reagents (Jackson ImmunoResearch): goat anti-rat Cy3 (1:2000), goat anti-mouse 647 (1:500), and goat anti-rabbit DyLight 488 (1:1000) in PBST + 5% normal serum. Sections were mounted on slides and coverslipped using DAPI mounting media to label cell nuclei and stored at 4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical analysis of pancreas and colon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreas and colon specimens were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, incubated with 30% sucrose, embedded in OCT compound (Olympus), and frozen in dry ice. 10-μM sections were permeabilized and blocked with Image-It FX signal enhancer (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes). The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-GFP (Abcam, 1/100), rat anti-mouse CD8a (BD Pharmingen, 1/100), mouse anti-Cytokeratin 8 (TROMA I, 1/50), goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, 1/500), goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, 1/500), and goat anti-rat Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1/500). Slides were mounted with Vectashield mount medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!