The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse monoclonal antibodies

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Germany

Mouse monoclonal antibodies are laboratory-produced antibodies derived from a single clone of mouse B cells. They are used as research tools in various applications such as immunoassays, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using mouse monoclonal antibodies

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of p21, p53, c-myc and EGFR in primary lesions were detected by immunohistochemistry. All primary antibodies and mouse monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Dako (Hamburg, Germany). The detailed sources, concentrations of antibody and positive sites were as follows: anti-p21 (clone SX118), 1:50 dilution, nucleus; anti-p53 (clone DO-7), 1:100 dilution, nucleus; anti-c-myc (clone 9E10), 1:100 dilution, cytoplasm; anti-EGFR (clone E30), 1:50 dilution, cytoplasm or membrane. The staining procedures followed supplier’ instructions. Negative controls were subjected to the same procedure except that the first antibody was replaced by PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Oncogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of p21, p53, c-myc, EGFR, and Neu/Her-2 in primary lesions was detected by immunohistochemical staining. All primary antibodies and mouse monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Dako (Hamburg, Germany). The detailed sources, concentrations of antibody and positive site were as follows: anti-p21 (clone SX118), 1:50 dilution, nucleus; anti-p53 (clone DO-7), 1:100 dilution, nucleus; anti-c-myc (clone 9E10), 1:100 dilution, cytoplasm; anti-EGFR (clone E30), 1:50 dilution, cytoplasm or membrane; anti-Neu/Her-2 (clone PN2A), 1:100 dilution, membrane. The staining experiments followed the supplier's instruction. Negative controls were subjected to the same procedure except that the first antibody was replaced by PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microvessel Density Analysis of Myocardial Infarction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the microvessel density (MVD) of the border of the injected sites, myocardial tissue sections were prepared and stained as previously described29 . Briefly, mouse monoclonal antibodies (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) were used to highlight the endothelial antigen CD34 using routine immunoperoxidase methods. Border zones around the injection site of the infarction were taken to count using an Olympus microscope. When counting, an individual microvessel was defined as any one brown-staining endothelial cell or cell cluster that was obviously different from adjacent microvessels, peripheral tissues and connective tissues. The microvessel density was counted in each of the five random sampling areas at high magnification, as described in a previous report30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a Autostainer Plus (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and mouse monoclonal antibodies from Dako, Medac (Hamburg, Germany), and Thermo Fisher (Dreieich, Germany) at dilutions shown in Table 1. A polyclonal antibody was only used for myeloperoxidase (MPO) staining. We followed the specific standardized protocol supplied by the manufacturer. Omission of the primary antibody served as a negative control. Briefly, slides were pretreated with Trilogy buffer (Medac; 1:100, 16 min at 95°C), citrate low buffer (Thermo Fisher; 1:100, 26 min at 98°C), or pronase E (Merck; 0.1%, 10 min at room temperature) followed by treatment with 3% H2O2 for 8 min. All antibodies were applied in a volume of 200 μl and incubated for 30 min. After washing (Medac wash buffer, 1:20 in aqua dest), secondary antibody (Medac) was applied in a volume of 200 μl and incubated for 20 min. After washing, each sample was incubated with polymer (200 μl) for 30 min (note that the secondary antibody and polymer are components of the color-coded BrightVision HRP kit from Medac). The slides were washed twice and incubated in Bright DAB (Medac) for 10 min. The slides were washed in aqua dest, counterstained with hematoxylin for 8 min, and washed before coverslipping [20 (link), 22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Viral Antigen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen, lung, liver, and lymph nodes were perfused with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde and then post-fixed overnight and processed for paraffin embedding. Five-micron thick sections were cut from the paraffin blocks, mounted on glass slides, and labeled with mouse monoclonal antibodies (Dako) for HLA-DQ/DP/DR (clone CR3/43, 1:100) and HIV-1p24 (1:10). The polymer-based HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Dako EnVision system was used as a secondary detection reagent and developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). All paraffin-embedded sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Deletion of primary antibodies or using mouse IgG served as controls. Images were obtained with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera fixed to a Nikon Eclipse E800 (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY) using NIS-Elements F 3.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemistry for HIV-1p24 in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen, lung, liver, and lymph nodes were perfused with PBS followed by 4% PFA and then postfixed overnight and embedded in paraffin. Five-micron-thick sections were cut from the paraffin blocks, mounted on glass slides, and labeled with mouse monoclonal antibodies (DakoCytomation) for HLA-DQ/DP/DR (clone CR3/43, 1:100) and HIV-1p24 (1:10). The polymer-based HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Dako EnVision system was used as a secondary detection reagent and developed with DAB. All paraffin-embedded sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Deletion of primary antibodies or mouse IgG served as controls. Images were obtained with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera fixed to a Nikon Eclipse E800 (Nikon Instruments) using NIS-Elements F 3.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Detection of Cell Cycle Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
p21, p53, and c-myc were detected by immunohistochemical method. All primary antibodies and mouse monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Dako (Hamburg. Germany). Immunohistochemical staining was performed by the enhance labeled polymer system (ELPS) method. After overnight incubation at 4°C with anti-p21, p53, and c-myc antibody, sections were treated according to standard immunoperoxidase methods using a streptavidin biotin peroxidise complex kit (LSAB + Kit/HRP; Dako). The peroxidise reaction was then developed with diaminobenzidine (Dako). Negative control sections were subjected to the same procedure except that the first antibody was replaced by phosphate buffer saline (PBS) [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lymphoid Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical stains were performed using a Dako EnVision detection kit, according to the manufacture's instructions (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). For antigen retrieval, the slides were steamed for 20 minutes in citrate antigen unmasking buffer. The sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies against κ-light chain, λ-light chain, MUM1, CD3, CD19, CD20, CD38, CD56 and CD138. These were either rabbit polyclonal antibodies or mouse monoclonal antibodies (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), at 1:500 or 1:50 dilutions. The incubation was for 45 minutes. Poly-HRP-conjugated anti-mouse/rabbit IgG antibody, as supplied in the EnVison kits, was used as the secondary antibody. The staining was visualized using 3,3 ′diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, FAST 3,3 ′ -diaminobenzidine tablets) and slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. In situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNAs (EBER) was performed as described previously [32] .
DNA was extracted in formalin-fixed and paraffinembedded (FFPE) sections from SP specimens. Im- munoglobulin (IG) genes rearrangement analysis was performed with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique using BIOMED-2 primer system [33] (Yuanqi Biomedical Technology Inc, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!